JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Feeding Monensin in Combination with Zeranol Implants on Performance, Carcass Traits and Nutrient Digestibility of Growing Lambs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Feeding Monensin in Combination with Zeranol Implants on Performance, Carcass Traits and Nutrient Digestibility of Growing Lambs
Owaimer, A.N.; Kraidees, M.S.; Al-Saiady, M.; Zahran, S.; Abouheif, M.A.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Thirty-six Naeimi ram lambs were equally and randomly allotted to four treatment groups with three replications per treatment to determine the simple and additive effects of monensin and zeranol on growth performance, carcass characteristics and nutrient digestibility. The treatment groups were: basal diet-fed lambs (C), monensin-fed lambs (M) where the basal diet was supplemented with 33 mg monensin per kilogram DM, lambs implanted with 12 mg zeranol (Z), and monensin-fed lambs implanted with zeranol (MZ). Lambs fed monensin-containing diet consumed 10.5% less (p<0.05) DM/100 kg weight and were 8.3% more (p<0.05) efficient in converting feed than lambs fed control diet. Zeranol implanted lambs tended to grow 35.2% (p<0.05) faster, consumed 5.1% more (p<0.05) feed and were (p<0.05) 21.9% more efficient in their feed conversion than control lambs. Responses of lambs to monensin and zeranol implants were not additive. Except for Z treatment, there were no marked differences in all carcass characteristics among the various treatment groups. Z-lambs produced 12.7% heavier (p<0.05) carcasses compared with those from C treatment. Also fat parameters, namely, kidney and pelvic fat (KP), body wall thickness and fat thickness, indicated trends for higher finish in Z treatment lambs (p<0.05) than for those lambs from other treatments. Except for CF and ADF, no significant differences in nutrients digestibility were noticed between various treatments; feeding monensin resulted in 24.5% and 8.5% depressions (p<0.05) in CF and ADF digestibility, respectively in comparison to C treatment. Nitrogen retention as percentage of total N-intakes was averaging 7.5 and 20.2% higher (p<0.05) in lambs implanted with zeranol than those fed the M and C diets, respectively.
 Keywords
Monensin;Zeranol;Performance;Carcass;Digestibility in Lambs;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effect of Feed Additives in Growing Lambs Fed Diets Containing Wet Brewers Grains,;;;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 10, pp.1425-1434 crossref(new window)
2.
Effect of Monensin and Live Yeast Supplementation on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Carcass Characteristics and Ruminal Fermentation Parameters in Lambs Fed Steam-flaked Corn-based Diets,;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 4, pp.547-554 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

2.
Bergstrom, R. C. and L. R. Maki. 1976. Coccidiostatic action of monensin fed to lambs: body weight gains and feed conversion efficiency. Amer. J. Vet. Res. 37:79-81.

3.
Boss, D. L. and J. G. P. Bowman. 1996. Barley varieties for finishing steers: 1. Feedlot performance, in vivo diet digestion and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1967-1972.

4.
Dinius, D. A., H. K. Goering, R. R. Oltjen and H. R. Cross. 1978. Finishing beef steers on forage diets with additives and supplemental lipid. J. Anim. Sci. 46:761-768.

5.
Ferrell, C. L., R. H. Kohlmeier, J. D. Crouse and H. Glimp. 1978. Influence of dietary, protein and biological type of steer upon rate of gain and carcass characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 46:255-270.

6.
Field, R. A., G. D. Snowder, G. Maiorano, R. J. McCormick and M. L. Riley. 1993. Growth and slaughter characteristics of ram and wether lambs implanted with zeranol. J. Anim. Sci. 71:631-635.

7.
Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analyses: apparatus, reagents, procedures and some applications. Agricultural Handbook No. 379, ARS, USDA, Washington, DC, USA.

8.
Goodrich, R. D., J. E. Garrett, D. R. Gast, M. A. Kirick, D. A. Larson and J. C. Meiske. 1984. Influence of monensin on the performance of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 58:1484-1498.

9.
Herod, E. L., E. E. Bartley, A. Davidovich, R. M. Bechtle, D. A. Sapienza and B. E. Brent. 1979. Effect of adaptation to monensin or lasalocid on rumen fermentation in vitro and the effect of these drugs on heifer growth and feed efficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 49(Suppl. 1): 374-381.

10.
Hoffman, D. J., C. F. Speth, T. P. Ringkob, A. L. Lesperance and J. A. McCormick. 1977. The effect of zeranol and monensin on feedlot steers. Proc. Western Sec., Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. 28:204-207.

11.
Hutcheson, J. P., L. W. Greene, G. E. Carstens, and F. M. Byers. 1992. Effects of zeranol and two dietary levels of calcium and phosphorus on performance, carcass and bone characteristics, and calcium status in growing lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1346-1351.

12.
Joyner, A. E., L. J. Brown, T. J. Fogg and R. T. Rossi. 1979. Effect of monensin on growth, feed efficiency and energy metabolism of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1065-1069.

13.
Larson, S., W. C. Russell, M. P. Botkin, M. L. Riley, R. A. Field and D. J. Nordby. 1983. Effects of ralgro on carcass composition of conventional and heavy weight lambs. Proc. Western Sect. Amer. Soc. Anim. Sci. 34:112-114.

14.
Maiorano, G., R. J. McCormick, R. A. Field and G. Snowder. 1993. Intramuscular collagen characteristics of ram, wether, and zeranol-implanted ram lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1817-1822.

15.
Morris, F. E., M. E. Branine, M. L. Galyean, M. E. Hubbert, A. S. Freeman and G. P. Lofgreen. 1990. effect of rotating monensin plus tylosin and lasalocid on performance, ruminal fermentation, and site and extent of digestion in feedlot cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:3069-3078.

16.
Nold, R. A., J. A. Unruh, C. W. Spaeth and J. E. Minton. 1992. Effect of zeranol implants in ram and wether lambs on performance traits, carcass characteristics, and subprimal cut yields and distribution. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1699-1707.

17.
Poos, M. I., T. L. Hanson and T. J. Klopfenstein. 1979. Monensin effects of diet digestibility, ruminal protein bypass and microbial protein synthesis. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1516-1524.

18.
Richardson, L. F. 1990. Monensin: Ruminal effects. In: Symposium: Monensin in the 1990's. pp. B1-B13. Elanco Anim. Health, Indianapolis, IN, USA.

19.
Rompala, R. E., T. A. Hoagland and L. A. Malkus. 1988. Effect of dietary history and zeranol on feedlot performance, carcass characteristics and chemical body composition of growing lambs. SID Res. J. 6:38-46.

20.
SAS Institute Inc. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide (Release 6.03). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA.

21.
Schelling, G. T. 1984. Monensin mode of action in the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 58:1518-1527.

22.
Song, M. K. and S. H. Choi. 2001. Growth promoters and their effects on beef production, Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:123-135.

23.
Surber, L. M. and J. G. P. Bowman. 1998. Monensin effects on digestion of corn or barley high-concentrate diets. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1945-1954.

24.
Utley, P. R., G. L. Newton, R. J. Ritter and W. C. McCormick. 1976. Effects of feeding monensin in combination with zeranol and testosterone-estradiol implants for growing and finishing heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 42:754-760.

25.
Van Nevel, C. J. and D. I. DeMeyer. 1977. Effect of monensin on rumen metabolism in vitro. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 34:251-257.

26.
Williams, J. E., S. J. Miller, T. A. Mollett, S. E. Grebing, D. K. Bowman and M. R. Ellersiek. 1987. Influence of frame size and zeranol on growth, compositional growth and plasma hormone characteristics. J. Anim. Sci. 65:1113-1123.

27.
Wilson, L. L., M. L. Borger, A. D. Peterson, M. C. Rugh and C. F. Orley. 1972. effects of zeranol, dietary protein level and methionine hydroxyl analog on growth and carcass characters and certain blood metabolites in lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 35:128-132.