JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Potential of Mulberry (Morus alba) as a Fodder Crop: The Effect of Plant Maturity on Yield, Persistence and Nutrient Composition of Plant Fractions
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Potential of Mulberry (Morus alba) as a Fodder Crop: The Effect of Plant Maturity on Yield, Persistence and Nutrient Composition of Plant Fractions
Saddul, D.; Jelan, Z.A.; Liang, J.B.; Halim, R.A.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The forage potential of mulberry (Morus alba) was evaluated under Malaysian conditions. The yield and nutrient composition of plant fractions of mulberry (whole plant, leaf and stem fractions) were determined at four harvest stages, namely, 3 (W3), 5 (W5), 7 (W7) and 9 (W9) weeks in a randomized block design. The study was conducted over a 9-month period to assess the persistence of the crop to repeated harvests. Fresh and dry matter (DM) yields of all plant fractions increased significantly (p<0.01) with increasing intervals between harvests, with highest DM yields at W9. The leaf to stem ratio declined significantly (p<0.01) from 5.2 (W3) to 0.9 (W9), indicating predominance of the stem fraction with advancing maturity. The nutritional composition of plant fractions was also significantly influenced (p<0.01) by advancing plant maturity at harvest. Crude protein (CP), ash and the metabolisable energy content of plant fractions declined significantly (p<0.01) from W3 to W9, while there was a corresponding significant increase (p<0.01) in the acid detergent fibre, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent lignin. From this study it was concluded that the optimum stage to harvest the whole plant is 5 weeks, which is a compromise between yield, nutrient composition (CP and fibre components), and the annual number of cuts, with good crop persistence to repeated harvests. Fresh mulberry whole plant can provide a valuable supplemental source of nutrients to poor quality basal diets.
 Keywords
Mulberry;Harvest Stage;Persistence;Yield;Nutrient Composition;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

2.
Blanco, R. 1992. Distancia de siembra y altura de corte en la produccion y calidad del forraje de Morera (Morus sp.) en el parcelamiento Cuyunta, Escuintla Guatemala. Guatemala. Universidad de San Carlos. p. 15.

3.
Boschini, C. F. 2002. Nutritional quality of mulberry cultivated for ruminant feeding. In: Mulberry for animal production (Ed. M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 171-180.

4.
Datta, R. K., A. Sarkar, P. RamaMohan Rao and N. R. Singhvi. 2002. Utilisation of mulberry as animal fodder in India. In: Mulberry for animal production (Ed. M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 183-187.

5.
Gomez, K. A. and A. A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. An International Rice Research Institute Book. A Willey Publication.

6.
Gonzalez, E. and M. Milera. 2002. Mulberry in Livestock Feeding Systems in Cuba: Forage Quality and Goat growth. In: Mulberry for animal production (M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy.

7.
Liu, J. X., Y. B. Jun Yao, J. Q. Yu, Z. Q. Shi and X. Q. Wang. 2002. The nutritional value of mulberry leaves and their use as supplement to growing sheep fed ammoniated rice straw. In: Mulberry for animal production (M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy.

8.
Martin, G., F. Reyes, I. Hernandez and M. Milera. 2002. Agronomic studies with mulberry in Cuba. In Mulberry for animal production (Ed. M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 103-114.

9.
NRC (National Research Council). 1981. Nutrient requirements of goats. No. 15. Washington, DC. Nati. Acad. Sci. p. 91.

10.
OMAF. 2003. Forages: Harvest & Storage -Forage Quality & Harvest Timing. Excerpt from Agronomy Guide for Field Crops (Chapter 5). ttp://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/english/crops/pub811/5qual.htm#forage

11.
Patra, A.K., K. Sharma, N. Dutta and A. K. Pattanaik. 2002. Effect of partial replacement of dietary protein by a leaf meal mixture containing Leucaena leucocephala, Morus alba and Azadirachta indica on performance of goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1732-1737.

12.
Poland, W. W., E. Grings, J. Karn and L. Manske. 2001. Mineral concentrations and availability of forages for grazing livestock in the northern great plains. Dickinson Research Extension Center, Beef Section. 2001 Annual Report. http://www.ag.ndsu.nodak.edu/dickinso/research/2000/beef00b.htm

13.
Rayburn, E. B. 1997. Forage quality-Minerals. http://www.caf. wvu.edu/~forage/5016.htm

14.
Rodriguez, C., R. Arias and J. Quinones. 1994. Efecto de la frecuencia de poda y el nivel de fertilisacion nitrogenada sobre et rendimiento y calidad de la biomasa de Morera (Morus sp.) en el tropica seco de Guatemala. In: Arboles y arbustos Forrajeros en Americana Central. Serie Tecnica. CATIE. Technical Report No. 236(2):515-528.

15.
Sanchez, M. D. 2000. Mulberry is an Exceptional Forage available worldwide! In: Mulberry for animal production (Ed. M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy.

16.
SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT User's guide (Release 6.12) SAS Inst. Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

17.
Schmidek, A. R. Takahashi, A.N. de Medeiro and K. T. de Resende. 2002. Bromatological composition and degradation rate of mulberry in goats. In: Mulberry for animal production (Ed. M. D. Sanchez). Animal Production and Health Paper, No. 147. pp. 207-211.

18.
Shayo, C. M. 1997. Uses, yield and nutritive value of mulberry. Trop. Glands, 31, pp. 599-604.

19.
Singh, B. and H. P. S. Makkar. 2000. The potential of mulberry foliage as feed supplement in India. In: Mulberry for animal production (Ed. M. D. Sanchez). Animal Health and Production Paper No. 147. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp. 139-153.

20.
Soo-Ho, L., K. Young-Taek, L. Sang-Poong, R. In-Jun, L. Jung- Sung and L. Byung-Ho. 1990. Sericulture training manual. FAO Agricultural Services Bulletin. No. 80. FAO, Rome, p. 58.

21.
Tingzing, Z., T. Yunfan, H. Guangxien, F. Huaizhong and M. Ben. 1988. Mulberry cultivation. FAO Agricultural Series Bulletin 73/1. Rome p. 127.

22.
Van Soest, P. J. 1990. Nutritional Ecology of the ruminant. 2nd ed. Comstock Publishing Associate. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

23.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3593.