JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Genetic Development of Sire, Dam and Progenies and Genotype Environment Interaction in a Beef Breeding System
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Genetic Development of Sire, Dam and Progenies and Genotype Environment Interaction in a Beef Breeding System
Bhuiyan, A.K.F.H.; Dietl, G.; Klautschek, G.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate genetic development and genotypeenvironment interactions (GEI) in postweaning body weight of fattening bulls at the end of test period (WT-T) under various beef fattening environments. Data on a total of 24,247 fattening bulls obtained from the industrial farm, breeding farms and testing stations were used. Heritability estimates for WT-T in all environments were nearly similar. Significant genetic developments of sire, dam and progenies for WT-T were observed in all environments. However, many differences in annual genetic developments between the environments were significant. The genetic correlations for WT-T between industrial farm and breeding farms, industrial farm and testing stations and breeding farms and testing stations were respectively 0.004, 0.004 and 0.013. These low estimates of genetic correlations and significant differences in genetic developments among environments clearly show the existence of GEI for WT-T among various fattening environments. Results of this study indicate the need for environment-specific genetic evaluation and selection of beef bulls for commercial beef production.
 Keywords
Beef Breeding;Genetic Development;Genotype-environment Interaction;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Averdunk, G., B. Woodward, G. Sauerer, H. J. Schild and F. Reinhard. 1987. Performance test results in relation to progeny tests under station and field conditions for Fleckvieh. In: Performance testing of AI bulls for efficiency and beef production in dairy and dual-purpose breeds. Proc. EAAP publication 34:36-44.

2.
Brown, M. A., A. H. Brown, W. G. Jackson and J. R. Miesner. 1993. Genotype${\times}$environment interactions in pos tweaning performance to yearling in Angus, Brahman, and reciprocalcross calves. J. Anim. Sci. 71:3273-9.

3.
Engellandt, T., N. Reinsch, Hans- Jürgen Schild and E. Kalm. 1998. Beef trait progeny test in German Simmentals-Definition of comparison groups with herd- year-season clustering. Arch. Tierz. 41(1/2):15-31.

4.
Falconer, D. S. 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, Third edition, London, UK, Longman.

5.
Frelich, J., J. Voriskova, J. Kunik and J. Kvapilik. 1998. Fattening ability and carcass value of bulls-crossbreds of Bohemian Spotted Cattle with beef breeds. Arch. Tierz. 41(6):533-544.

6.
Groeneveld, E., M. Kovac and T. Wang. 1990. Pest, a general purpose BLUP package for multivariate prediction and estimation. In: Proc. 4th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. Edinburgh, UK. 13:488-491.

7.
Groeneveld, E. 1994. VCE, a multivariate multimodel REML (co)variance component estimation package. In: Proc. 5th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod. Guelph. Canada. 22:47-48.

8.
Henderson, C. R. 1973. Sire evaluation and genetic trends. In: Proc. of the Anim. Breed. and Genetics symposium in honour of Dr. Jay L. Lush (July, 1972). ASAS/ADSA, Champaign, III:10-28.

9.
Henderson, C. R. 1975. Best linear unbiased estimation and prediction under a selection model. Biometrics 32:423-447.

10.
Klautschek, G. 1989. Relations between environmental conditions and genotype${\times}$environment interactions in fattening performances of cattle. Arch. Tierz. 32(4):383-388.

11.
Korver, S., G. Averdunk and B. B. Anderson. 1987. Performance testing of AI bulls for efficiency and beef production in dairy and dual-purpose breeds. Proc. EAAP publication 34:214.

12.
L$\"{o}$hrke, B. and G. Klautschek. 1971. Programm der Fleischrindz$\"{u}$chtung zur Erzeugung von Masthybriden f$\"{u}$r die industriem$\"{a}$ $\beta$ige Rindfleischproduktion. Teilabschlu$\beta$ber. FZ Dummerstorf-Rostock der Akad. Landwirtsch-Wiss. DDR.

13.
Oldenbroek, J. K., H. A. J. Laurijsen and J. Ten Napel. 1987. Relationship between performance test and progeny test for veal and beef production in Black and White dairy cattle. In: Performance testing of AI bulls for efficiency and beef production in dairy and dual-purpose breeds. Proc. EAAP publication 34:45-51.

14.
Pahnish, O. F., J. J. Urick, W. C. Burns, W. T. Butts, M. Koger and R. L. Blackwell. 1985. Genotype${\times}$environment interactionin Hereford cattle: IV. Postweaning traits of bulls, J. Anim. Sci. 61:1146-53.

15.
Patterson, L. D. and R. Thompson. 1971. Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545-447.

16.
SAS Institute: SAS/STAT Guide Release 6.12. Cary, NC (1996).

17.
Schoeman, S. J. and G. G. Jordaan. 1998. Animal${\times}$testing environment interaction on postweaning liveweight gains of young bulls. Aust. J. Agric. Res.49:607-612.

18.
Tilsch, K. 1986. Zu den Beziehungen zwischen reproduktiven and produktiven Leistungen beim Fleischrind. Arch. Tierzucht 29:379-386.

19.
WEI, M., H. A. M. Steen, J. H. J. van der Werf and E. W. Brascamp. 1991. Relationship between purebred and crossbred parameters. 1. Variances and covariances under the one-locus model. J. Anim. Breed. & Genet. 108:253-261.

20.
Westell, R. A., R. A. Quass and L. D. Van Vleck. 1988. Genetic groups in an animal model. J. Dairy Sci. 71:1310-1318.

21.
Wollert, J. 1985. Untersuchungen zur Eigenleistungspr$\"{u}$fung unter besonderer Ber$\"{u}$cksichtigung der Erh$\"{o}$hung der Genauigkeit der Zuchtwertschtzung, Berlin, Akad. Landwirtsch. Wiss. DDR, Diss. A.