JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Use of Chemical and Biological Agents to Improve Water Quality of Effluent Discharge from Abattoirs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Use of Chemical and Biological Agents to Improve Water Quality of Effluent Discharge from Abattoirs
Goopy, J.P.; Murray, P.J.; Lisle, A.T.; Al Jassim, R.A.M.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Intensive animal industries create large volumes of nutrient rich effluent which, if untreated, has the potential for substantial environmental degradationand to recover valuable nutrients that would otherwise be lost. Members of the family Lemnaceae are widely used in lagoon systems, to achieve inexpensive and efficient remediation of effluent. Only limited research has been conducted into their growth in highly eutrophic media and there has been little done to systematically distinguish between different types of media. This study examined the growth characteristics of duckweed in abattoir effluent and explored possible ways of ameliorating the inhibitory factors to growth on this medium. A series of pot trials was conducted to test the tolerance of duckweed to abattoir effluent partially remediated by a sojourn in anaerobic fermentation ponds, both in its unmodified form and after the addition of acid to manipulate pH, and the addition of bentonite. Unmodified abattoir effluent was highly toxic to duckweed, even at dilutions of 3:1. Duckweed remained viable and grew sub-optimally in simplified media with total ammonia nitrogen (TAN) concentrations of up to 100 mg/L. Duckweed grew vigorously in effluent diluted 1:4 v/v, containing 56 mg TAN/L when modified by addition of acid (to decrease pH to 7) and bentonite at 0.5%. The results of this study suggest that bentonite plays an important role in modifying the toxicity of abattoir effluent to duckweed.
 Keywords
Ammonium;Nitrogen;Meatworks;Abattoir Effluent;Lemnaceae;Bentonite;Duckweed;Phosphorus;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Al-Nozaily, F. 2001. Pilot plant operation of a duckweed-covered sewage lagoon (DSL) in Sana’a, Yemen. II Growth Nutrient Budget and FC Removal. In: Performance and process analysis of duckweed-covered sewage lagoons for high strength sewage-the case of sana’a yemen. Doctoral Thesis A.A. Balkema Pub. pp. 173-202.

2.
Ashworth, J. 1978. Reactions of ammonia with soil II. Sorption of NH3 on English soils and on wyoming bentonite. J. Soil Sci.29:195-206.

3.
Bergmann, B., J. Cheng, J. Classen and A. Stomp. 2000a. Nutrient removal from swine lagoon effluent by duckweed. Trans of the A.S.A.E. 43(2):263-269.

4.
Bergmann, B., J. Cheng, J. Classen and A. Stomp. 2000b. In vitro Selection of duckweed geographical isolates for potential use in swine lagoon effluent renovation. Biores. Tech. 73:13-20.

5.
Booth, D. J. 1999. Effects of dietary and free bentonite on ammonia buildup in aquarium fish. A’asian J. Ecotoxicology. 5:149-152.

6.
Brindson, E. Y. 1995. The oxoid manual. Unipoth Ltd. Hampshire, England. 2-175.

7.
Britto, D. T., M. Y. Siddiqi, A. D. Glass and H. J. Kronzucker. 2001. Futile transmembrane$NH_4{^+}$ cycling: A cellular hypothesis to explain ammonium toxicity in plants. Proc. Nat.

8.
Budavari, S. 1996. The merck index-an encyclopedia of chemicals,drugs and biologicals. 12th ed. Merck & Co. New Jersey.

9.
Bureau of Meteorology 2001. Averages for gatton QDPI research station. Found at: http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/averages/tables/cw040436.shtml.

10.
Caicedo, J. R., N. P. Van Der Steen, O. Arce and H. J. Gijzen. 2000. Effect of total ammonia nitrogen concentration and pH on growth rates of duckweed (Spirodella polyrrhiza). Water Resour. 34 (15):3829-3385.

11.
Cheng, J., B. Bergmann, J. Classen, A. Stomp and J. Howard. 2002. Nutrient recovery from swine lagoon water by Spirodella punctata. Biores Tech. 81:81-85.

12.
Culley, D. D. and E. A. Epps. 1973. Use of duckweeds for waste treatment and animal feed. J. Water Pollut. Control Fed. 45:337-347.

13.
Ford, B. G. and D. T. Clarkson. 1999. Nitrate and ammonium nutrition of plants: physiological and molecular perspectives. In: (Ed. J. A. Callow). Adv. Bot. Res. 30:1-49.

14.
Goopy, J. P and P. J. Murray. 2003. Lemnaceae: A review on the role of duckweed in nutrient reclamation and as a source of animal feed. Asian-Aust. J. Anim Sci. 16(2):297-305.

15.
Hanson, N. W. 1973. Official, standardized and recommended methods of analysis. The Society for Analytical Chemistry, London

16.
Henzell, E. F., I. Vallis and J. E. Lindquist. 1968. Automatic colorimetric methods for the determination of nitrogen in digests and extracts of soils. Trans. of Int. Soil Sci. Cong.2:513-519.

17.
Johns, M. and P. Greenfield. 1992. Nutrient removal from abattoir Wastewater. Proc. of Abattoir waste water and odour management Conference Bris. pp. 119-130.

18.
Leng, R. A. 1999. Duckweed, a tiny aquatic plant with enormous potential for agriculture and environment. FAO. Tran Phu Printing Co. Ho Chi Minh City

19.
Ma, Y. B. and N. C. Uren. 1998. Dehydration, diffusion and entrapment of zinc in bentonite. Clays Clay Min. 46(2):132-138.

20.
Ockerman, H. W. and C. L. Hansen. 2000. Animal by-product processing and utilization. techromic Pub. Co. Pa. USA: 457-473.

21.
O'Neill, J. and R. Webb. 1970. Simultaneous determination of nitrogen phosphorus and potassium in plant material by automatic methods. J. Sci. Food Agric. 21:217-219. crossref(new window)

22.
Oron, G., L. R. Wildschut and D. Porath. 1985. Waste water recycling by duckweed for protein production and effluent renovation. Water Sci Tech. 17:803-817.

23.
Oron, G., D. Porath and L. R. Wildschut. 1986. Waste water treatment and renovation by different duckweed species. J. Environ Engin. 112(2):247-261.

24.
Payne, V., J. Shipp and F. Miller. 1980. Supernatant characteristics of three animal waste lagoons in north alabama. Livestock Waste: A Renewable Resource. Proc. 4th International Symposium on Livestock Wastes Trans ASAE St. Joseph Miss.240-243.

25.
Pratley, J. E. 1992. Principles of field crop production. $2^{nd}$ ed .Sydney University Press. 251-252.

26.
Roux, A. and W. A. Pretorius. 1997. Renovation of waste water for direct use in an abattoir. Water S. A. Pretoria 23(4):323-331.

27.
Rusoff, L. L., E. W. Blakney and D. D. Culley. 1980. Duckweeds (Lemnaceae Family): a potential source of protein and amino acids. J. Agric. Food Chem. 28:848-850.

28.
Skillicorn, P., W. Spira. and W. Journey. 1993. Duckweed Aquaculture- a new aquatic farming system for developing countries. The World Bank, Washington DC.

29.
Storer, R. A. 1992. 1992 Annual Book of ASTM Standards. American Society for Testing and Materials Vol.1. Philadelphia USA.

30.
van der Steen, P., A. Brenner and G. Oron. 1998. An integrated duckweed and algae pond system for nitrogen removal and renovation. Water Sci. Tech. 38(1):335-343.

31.
Venglovsky, J., N. Sasakova, M. Vargova, Z. Pacajova and P. Juris 1998.'The removal of ammonia from pig excrements with natural zeolite and bentonite. Proc. 3rd Scien. Symp. On DDD with I’natl. Participation pp. 53-58.

32.
Vermaat, J. E. and M. K. Haniff. 1998. Performance of common duckweed species (Lemnaceae) and the water fern Azolla filiculoides on different types of waste water. Water Resour 32(9): 2569-2576.

33.
Wang, W. 1991. Ammonia toxicity to Macrophytes (common duckweed and rice) using static and renewal methods. Environ Toxic Chem. 10:1173-1177.

34.
Warren, K. S. 1962. Ammonia toxicity and pH. Nature 195:47-49. crossref(new window)

35.
Whitehead, A. J., K. V. Lo and N. R. Bulley. 1987. The effect of hydraulic retention time and duckweed cropping rate on nutrient removal from dairy barn wastewater. In: Aquatic Plants for Water Treatment and Resource Recovery. (K. R. Reddy and W. H. Smith) Magnolia Publishing Inc.Philidelphia

36.
Williams, P. E. 1995. Animal production and european production problems anim Feed. Sci. Tech. 53:135-144.

37.
Wruck, D. 2001. Determination of Ammonia (Manual Method). KORDI Workshop, Queensland Government, Scientific Services.

38.
Zirschky, J. and S. C. Reed. 1988. The use of duckweed for wastewater treatment. J. Water Poll. Cont. Fed 60(7):1253-1257.