JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence of Essential Oil Components on Growth Performance and the Functional Activity of the Pancreas and Small Intestine in Broiler Chickens
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Influence of Essential Oil Components on Growth Performance and the Functional Activity of the Pancreas and Small Intestine in Broiler Chickens
Jang, I.S.; Ko, Y.H.; Yang, H.Y.; Ha, J.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Kim, J.Y.; Kang, S.Y.; Yoo, D.H.; Nam, D.S.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, C.Y.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
To investigate the efficacy of alternatives to antibiotics, the present study was conducted to compare the effects of antibiotic, lactic acid, a blend of commercial essential oils (EOs) and EOs in combination with lactic acid on growth performance and the functional activity of the gut in broiler chickens. A total of 168 broiler chickens were given the basal diet supplemented with 10 ppm colistin (T1), 0.1% lactic acid (T2), 25 ppm EOs (T3), 25 ppm EOs+0.1% lactic acid (T4), 50 ppm EOs (T5) or 50 ppm EOs+0.1% lactic acid (T6) in the period 3 to 35 days of age. As a result, the broiler chickens assigned to T4 group throughout the experimental period had apparently (p<0.05) greater body weight and total gain than these assigned to T1, T2, T3 and T5 groups. However, there was no difference in growth performance among the birds fed the diets supplemented with antibiotic (T1), lactic acid (T2) and EOs (T3 and T5) alone. The weights of digestive organs and the number of lactobacilli and E. coli in the lower ileum were not affected by dietary treatments. Total trypsin activity was significantly (p<0.05) greater in T4 than T1, T2, T3 and T5 groups. Total and specific pancreatic -amylase activities were significantly (p<0.05) enhanced in the broiler chickens fed T4 diet compared with these fed T1, T2 and T3 diets. However, there were no differences in growth performance and digestive enzyme activities including pancreatic trypsin and -amylase between T4 and T6 groups fed the diets supplemented with either low or high EOs levels in combination of lactic acid. In conclusion, a blend of commercial EOs combined with lactic acid showed significant increases in digestive enzyme activities of the pancreas and intestinal mucosa, leading to increase in growth performance.
 Keywords
Essential Oils;Lactic Acid;Trypsin;-Amylase;Maltase;Broiler Chickens;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Intestinal Growth and Development of Weanling Pigs in Response to Dietary Supplementation of Antibiotics, Phytogenic Products and Brewer's Yeast plus Bacillus Spores,;;;;;;;;;;

Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2011. vol.53. 3, pp.227-235 crossref(new window)
2.
Effects of Functional Oils on Coccidiosis and Apparent Metabolizable Energy in Broiler Chickens,;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014. vol.27. 7, pp.981-989 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Bassett, R. 2000. Oregano’s positive impact on poultry production. World Poultry 16(9):31-34.

2.
Bernfeld, P. 1955. Methods in Enzymology 1:149-158.

3.
Botsoglou, N. A., P. Florou-Paner, E. Christaki, D. J. Fletouris and A. B. Spais. 2002. Effect of dietary oregano essential oil on performance of chickens and on iron-induced lipid oxidation of breast, thigh and abdominal fat tissues. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:223-230.

4.
Case, G. L., L. He, H. Mo and C. E. Elson. 1995. Induction of geranyl pyrophosphate pyrophosphatase activity by cholesterol-suppressive isoprenoids. Lipids 30:357-359.

5.
Coates, M. E., R. Fuller, G. F. Harrison, M. Lev and S. F. Suffolk. 1963. A comparison of the growth of chicks in the Gustafsson germ-free apparatus and in a convensional enviroment, with and without dietary supplements of penicillin. Br. J. Nutr. 17:141-150.

6.
Collington, G. K., D. S. Park and D. G. Armstrong. 1990. The influence of inclusion of either an antibiotic and a probiotic in the diet on the development of digestive enzyme activity in the pig. Br. J. Nutr. 64:59-70.

7.
Cowan, M. M. 1999. Plant products as antimicrobial products. Clinical Microbiol. Rev. 12:564-582.

8.
Dahlgvist, A. 1968. Assay of the intestinal disaccharidase. 1968. Anal. Biochem. 22:99-107.

9.
Evans, J. W., M. S. Plunkett and M. J. Banfield. 2001. Effect of essential oil blend on coccidiosis in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 80 (suppl. 1):258 (abstract).

10.
Ferraris, R. P., S. A. Villenas and J. M. Diamond. 1992. Regulation of brush border enzyme activities and enterocyte migration in mouse small intestine. Am. J. Physiol. 262:G1047-1059.

11.
Geiger, R. and H. Fritz. 1986. Trypsin. In: Methods of Enzymatic Analysis. (Ed. H. Bergmeyer). Academic Press. New York, Vol 5, pp. 119-128.

12.
Hammer, K. A., C. F. Carson and T. V. Riley. 1999. Antimicrobial activity of essential oils and other palnts extracts. J. Appl. Microbiol. 86:985-990.

13.
Helander, I. M., H. L. Alakomi, K. Latva-Kala, T. Mattila-Sandholm, I. Pol, E. J. Smid, L. G. M. Gorris and A. Von Wright. 1998. Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram-negative bacteria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 46:3590-3595.

14.
Jang, I., K. K. Jung and J. S. Cho. 2000. Influence of age on duodenal brush border membrane and specific activities brush border membrane enzymes in Wistar rats. Exp. Anim. 49(4):281-287.

15.
Kamel, C. 2001. Tracing modes of action and the roles of plant extracts in non-ruminants. In: Recent advances in animal nutrition. (Ed. P. C. Garnsworthy and J. Wiseman). Nottingham University Press. Nottingham. pp. 135-150.

16.
Khan, N. 2003. Feed acidifiers- blending for success. Feed Mix. 11:28-30.

17.
Kohler, B. 1997. Effects on gut microflora. Akzo Nobel.

18.
Langhout, P. 2000. New additives for broiler chickens. World Poultry 16(3):22-27.

19.
Lawrence, B. M. and R. J. Reynolds. 1984. Progress in essential oils. Perfumer and Flavorist. 9:23-31.

20.
Lee, M. H., H. J. Lee and P. D. Ryu. 2001. Public health risks: Chemical and antibiotic residues. Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:402-413.

21.
Lee, K. W. 2002. Essential oils in broiler nutrition. Thesis. Departartment of nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

22.
Platel, K. and K. Srinivasan. 1996. Influence of dietary spices or their active principles on digestive enzymes of small intestinal mucosa in rats. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 47:55-59.

23.
Platel, K. and K. Srinivasan. 2000. Influence of dietary spices and their active principles on pancreatic enzymes in albino rats. Nahrung 44:42-46.

24.
Ravindran, V. and E. T. Kornegay. 1993. Acidification of weaner pig diets: A review. J. Sci. Food Agric. 62:313-322.

25.
Ryniba, I. V., H. Liu, Y. Gor and S. J. Feinmark. 1997. Regulation of leukotriene A4 hydrolase activity in endothelial cells by phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 272(50):31865-71.

26.
SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition. Vol. 2. 1989. SAS Ins., Cary, NC.

27.
Thaela, M. J., M. S. Jensen, S. G. Pierzynowski, S. Jakob and B. B. Jensen. 1998. Effect of lactic acid supplementation on pancreatic secretion in pigs after weaning. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 7:181-183.

28.
van de Broek, Ir. G. 2000. Organic acid: Natural link between drug and growth promoter. Feed Mix. Special. 9-11.

29.
Wenk, C. 2000. Recent advances in animal feed additives such as metabolic modifiers, antimicrobial agents, probiotics, enzymes and highly available minerals. Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:86-95.

30.
William, P. and R. Losa. 2001. The use of essential oils and their compounds in poultry nutrition. World Poultry 17(4):14-15.

31.
Xu, Z. R., X. T. Zou, C. H. Hu, M. S. Xia, X. A. Zhan and M. Q. Wang. 2002. Effects of dietary fructooligosaccharide on digestive enzyme activities, intestinal microflora and morphology of growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1784-1789.