JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Lactobacilli on the Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, VFA Concentration and Gastrointestinal Microbial Flora of Weaning Pigs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Lactobacilli on the Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, VFA Concentration and Gastrointestinal Microbial Flora of Weaning Pigs
Huang, Canghai; Qiao, Shiyan; Li, Defa; Piao, Xiangshu; Ren, Jiping;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a complex Lactobacilli preparation on performance, resistance to E. coli infection and gut microbial flora of weaning pigs. In exp. 1, twelve pigs (7.651.10 kg BW), weaned at 28 d, were randomly allotted into 2 groups and placed in individual metabolic cages. During the first 7 d, one group of pigs was provided ad libitum access to water containing colony forming units (CFU) Lactobacilli per ml and the control group was provided tap water. The Lactobacilli preparation included Lactobacillus gasseri, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus and L. fermentum, which were isolated from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract mucosa of weaning pigs. On d 8, 20 ml of CFU/ml E. coli solution (serovars K99, K88 and 987P at the ratio of 1:1:1) was orally administered to each pig. Diarrhea scores and diarrhea incidence were recorded from d 7 to 14. On d 14, pigs were euthanized and digesta and mucosa from the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon were sampled using aseptic technique to determine microflora by culturing bacteria in selective medium. The results showed that Lactobacilli treatment significantly decreased E. coli and aerobe counts (p<0.01) but increased Lactobacilli and anaerobe counts (p<0.01) in digesta and mucosa of most sections of the GI tract. A 66 and 69.1% decrease in diarrhea index and diarrhea incidence, respectively, was observed in the Lactobacilli treated group. In exp. 2, Thirty-six crossbred DurocLandraceYorkshire piglets, weaned at 282 days, were selected and randomly allocated into 2 groups. There were 18 piglets in each group, 3 piglets in one pen and 6 replicates in each treatment with 3 pens of barrow and 3 pens of female piglet in each treatment. Piglets had ad libitum access to feed and water. The initial body weight of piglet was 7.651.09 kg. Dietary treatments included a non-medicated basal diet with Lactobacilli ( CFU/g diet) or carbadox (60 mg/kg) as control. On d 21, six pigs per group (one pig per pen) were euthanized. Ileal digesta was collected to determine apparent amino acid digestibility. Microflora content was determined similarly to exp.1. The results showed that Lactobacilli treatment significantly improved average daily feed intake (ADFI) of pigs compared to carbadox (p<0.05) during the first 2 wks after weaning and average daily gain (ADG) and ADFI increased significantly (p<0.05) from d 8 to 14. Nitrogen and total phosphorus digestibility also increased (p<0.05). Bacterial counts were similar to exp. 1. The results indicate that the complex Lactobacilli preparation improved performance for 2 wks after weaning, enhanced resistance to E. coli infection, and improved microbial balance in the GI tract.
 Keywords
Lactobacillus;Growth Performance;Diarrhea;Weaning Pig;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Characteristics of Solid-state Fermented Feed and its Effects on Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Growing-finishing Pigs,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 11, pp.1635-1641 crossref(new window)
2.
Effects of Dietary Synbiotics from Anaerobic Microflora on Growth Performance, Noxious Gas Emission and Fecal Pathogenic Bacteria Population in Weaning Pigs,;;;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 8, pp.1202-1208 crossref(new window)
3.
Effects of Feeding Solid-state Fermented Rapeseed Meal on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Intestinal Ecology and Intestinal Morphology of Broiler Chickens,;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2010. vol.23. 2, pp.263-271 crossref(new window)
4.
Effects of Supplementation of Probiotics on the Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Faecal Microflora in Growing-finishing Pigs,;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2011. vol.24. 5, pp.655-661 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.

2.
Bechman, T. J., J. V. Chambers and M. D. Cunningham. 1977. Influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus on performance of young dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 60:74 abs.

3.
Blomberg, L., A. Henriksson and P. L. Conway. 1993. Inhibition of adhesion of Escherichia coli K88 to piglet ileal mucus by Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:34-39.

4.
Chen, T. Sh. 1995. Manufacture and Application of Microbiological Medium. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, P. R. China (Chinese).

5.
Ehrmann, M. A., P. Kurzak, J. Bauer and R. F. Vogel. 2002. Characterization of Lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:966-975.

6.
Ewing, W. N. and D. J. A. Cole. 1994. The Living Gut. Context Publishing.

7.
Fahy, V. A., D. Connaughton, S. J. Driesen and E. M. Spicer. 1987. Post-weaning colibacillosis, in Manipulating Pig Production,(ed. APSA Committee), Australian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia, pp. 189-201.

8.
Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animal. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378.

9.
GB/G 18246-2000. 2000. Standard method to determine amino acid content in feed. Chinese Quality Technical Superintend Bureau, Beijing.

10.
Guarner, F. and G. J. Schaafsma. 1998. Probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 39:237-238.

11.
Hart, G. K. and G. J. Dobb. 1988. Effect of a fecal bulking agent on diarrhea during enteral feeding in the critically ill. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 12:465-468.

12.
Hoefling, D. 1989. Tracking the culprits behind diarrhea in neonatal pigs. Vet. Med. 4: -427.

13.
Huis in’t Veld, J. H. J. and R. Havenaar. 1993. Selection criteria for microorganisms for probiotic use. In: FLAIR No.1 6 Prevention and Control of Potentially Pathogenic Microorganisms in Poultry and Poultry Meat Processing. Proceedings, 12. Probiotics and Pathogenicity (Ed. J. F. Jensen, M. H.l Hinton and R. W. A. W. Mulder) COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, D. A. Beekbergen, Netherlands, pp. 11-19.

14.
Jensen, M. T., R. P. Cox and B. B. Jensen. 1995. Microbial production of skatole in the hindgut of pigs fed different diets and its relation to skatole deposition in back fat. J. Anim. Sci. 61:293-304.

15.
Kidder, D. E. and M. J. Manners. 1978. Digestion in the pig. Scientechnica, Bristol.

16.
Kornegay, E. T. 1986. Effect of dosing or feeding Lactobacillus acidophilus on blood cholesterol levels and growth rate of weanling and growing pigs. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Animal Science Research Report, No. 5, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, pp. 14-19.

17.
Xuan, Z. N., J. J. Kim, K. N. Heo, H. J. Jung, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Han, Y. Y. Kim and In K. Han. 2001. Study on the development of a probivitics complex for weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14(10):1425-1428.

18.
Levy, S. B. 1992. The Antibiotic Paradox. How Miracle Drugs are Destroying the Miracle. New York: Plenum Press.

19.
McCarthy, J. F., F. X. Aherne and D. B. Okai. 1974. Use of HCl insoluble ash as an index material for determining apparent digestibility with pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 54:107-109.

20.
Metchnikoff, E. 1908. The Prolongation of Life. (Translation by P. C. Mitchell) C. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, USA, pp. 89-95.

21.
Mollgaard, H. 1946. On Phytic acid, its importance in metabolism and its enzymic cleavage in bread supplemented with calcium. Biochem. J. 40:589-603.

22.
Muralidhara, K. S., G. G. Sheggeby and P. R. Elliker. 1977. Effect of feeding Lactobacilli on the coliform and Lactobacillus flora of intestinal tissue and feces from piglets. J. Food Protect. 40:288-295.

23.
NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

24.
Nurmi, E. and M. Rantala. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature. 241:210-211.

25.
Paul, W. J. J., van der Wielen, S. Biesterveld, S. Notermans, H. Hofstra, B. A. P. Urlings and F. van Knapen. 2000. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2536-2540.

26.
Pollman, D. S. 1986. Probiotics in pig diets, in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (Ed. W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole), Butterworth, London, pp. 193-205.

27.
Pollman, D. S., D. M. Danielson and E. R. Peo. 1980. Effects of microbial feed additives on performance of starter and growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 51:577-581.

28.
Premi, L. and V. Bottazzi. 1974. Use of Lactobacilli in the control of intestinal disturbances of pigs. Proc. XIX Int. Dairy Congr. 1974. India. 1 D. p. 89.

29.
Rojas, M. and P. L. Conway. 1996. Colonization by Lactobacilli of piglet small intestinal mucus. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81:474-480.

30.
Silva, M., N. V. Jacobus, C. Deneke and S. L. Gorbach. 1987. Antimicrobial substance from a human Lactobacillus strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:1231-1233.

31.
Tortuero, F. 1973. Influence of implantation of Lactobacillus acidophilus in chicks on the growth, feed conversion, malabsorption of fats syndrome and intestinal flora. Poult. Sci. 52:197-203.

32.
Watkins, B. A., B. F. Miller and D. H. Neil. 1982. In vivo inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus against pathogenic Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic chicks. Poult. Sci. 61:1298-1308.

33.
Winkelstein, A. 1956. L. acidophilus tablets in the therapy of functional intestinal disorders. Am. Practitioner Dig. Treatment. 7:1637-1639.