JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Lactobacilli on the Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, VFA Concentration and Gastrointestinal Microbial Flora of Weaning Pigs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Lactobacilli on the Performance, Diarrhea Incidence, VFA Concentration and Gastrointestinal Microbial Flora of Weaning Pigs
Huang, Canghai; Qiao, Shiyan; Li, Defa; Piao, Xiangshu; Ren, Jiping;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effects of a complex Lactobacilli preparation on performance, resistance to E. coli infection and gut microbial flora of weaning pigs. In exp. 1, twelve pigs (7.651.10 kg BW), weaned at 28 d, were randomly allotted into 2 groups and placed in individual metabolic cages. During the first 7 d, one group of pigs was provided ad libitum access to water containing colony forming units (CFU) Lactobacilli per ml and the control group was provided tap water. The Lactobacilli preparation included Lactobacillus gasseri, L. reuteri, L. acidophilus and L. fermentum, which were isolated from the gastrointestinal (GI) tract mucosa of weaning pigs. On d 8, 20 ml of CFU/ml E. coli solution (serovars K99, K88 and 987P at the ratio of 1:1:1) was orally administered to each pig. Diarrhea scores and diarrhea incidence were recorded from d 7 to 14. On d 14, pigs were euthanized and digesta and mucosa from the stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum and colon were sampled using aseptic technique to determine microflora by culturing bacteria in selective medium. The results showed that Lactobacilli treatment significantly decreased E. coli and aerobe counts (p<0.01) but increased Lactobacilli and anaerobe counts (p<0.01) in digesta and mucosa of most sections of the GI tract. A 66 and 69.1% decrease in diarrhea index and diarrhea incidence, respectively, was observed in the Lactobacilli treated group. In exp. 2, Thirty-six crossbred DurocLandraceYorkshire piglets, weaned at 282 days, were selected and randomly allocated into 2 groups. There were 18 piglets in each group, 3 piglets in one pen and 6 replicates in each treatment with 3 pens of barrow and 3 pens of female piglet in each treatment. Piglets had ad libitum access to feed and water. The initial body weight of piglet was 7.651.09 kg. Dietary treatments included a non-medicated basal diet with Lactobacilli ( CFU/g diet) or carbadox (60 mg/kg) as control. On d 21, six pigs per group (one pig per pen) were euthanized. Ileal digesta was collected to determine apparent amino acid digestibility. Microflora content was determined similarly to exp.1. The results showed that Lactobacilli treatment significantly improved average daily feed intake (ADFI) of pigs compared to carbadox (p<0.05) during the first 2 wks after weaning and average daily gain (ADG) and ADFI increased significantly (p<0.05) from d 8 to 14. Nitrogen and total phosphorus digestibility also increased (p<0.05). Bacterial counts were similar to exp. 1. The results indicate that the complex Lactobacilli preparation improved performance for 2 wks after weaning, enhanced resistance to E. coli infection, and improved microbial balance in the GI tract.
 Keywords
Lactobacillus;Growth Performance;Diarrhea;Weaning Pig;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Characteristics of Solid-state Fermented Feed and its Effects on Performance and Nutrient Digestibility in Growing-finishing Pigs,;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2008. vol.21. 11, pp.1635-1641 crossref(new window)
2.
Effects of Dietary Synbiotics from Anaerobic Microflora on Growth Performance, Noxious Gas Emission and Fecal Pathogenic Bacteria Population in Weaning Pigs,;;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2009. vol.22. 8, pp.1202-1208 crossref(new window)
3.
Effects of Feeding Solid-state Fermented Rapeseed Meal on Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Intestinal Ecology and Intestinal Morphology of Broiler Chickens,;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2010. vol.23. 2, pp.263-271 crossref(new window)
4.
Effects of Supplementation of Probiotics on the Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Faecal Microflora in Growing-finishing Pigs,;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2011. vol.24. 5, pp.655-661 crossref(new window)
1.
Effects of the antimicrobial peptide cecropin AD on performance and intestinal health in weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli, Peptides, 2012, 35, 2, 225  crossref(new windwow)
2.
The adhesion of putative probiotic lactobacilli to cultured epithelial cells and porcine intestinal mucus, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2008, 104, 4, 1082  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Effects of probiotics in swines growth performance: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 219, 280  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Effects of different probiotic complexes of lactic acid bacteria on growth performance and gut environment of weaned piglets, Livestock Science, 2010, 133, 1-3, 182  crossref(new windwow)
5.
Effects of Supplementation of Probiotics on the Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Faecal Microflora in Growing-finishing Pigs, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2011, 24, 5, 655  crossref(new windwow)
6.
The effect of prebiotics and synbiotics on Clostridium and Escherichia coli counts in human intestinal tract, Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2013, 60, 3, 77  crossref(new windwow)
7.
Growth performance, digestibility, gut environment and health status in weaned piglets fed a diet supplemented with a complex of lactic acid bacteria alone or in combination with Bacillus subtilis and Saccharomyces boulardii, Livestock Science, 2012, 143, 2-3, 132  crossref(new windwow)
8.
Impact of dietary fiber/starch ratio in shaping caecal microbiota in rabbits, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2015, 61, 10, 771  crossref(new windwow)
9.
Growth performance, digestibility, gut environment and health status in weaned piglets fed a diet supplemented with potentially probiotic complexes of lactic acid bacteria, Livestock Science, 2010, 129, 1-3, 95  crossref(new windwow)
10.
Comparison of probiotic lactobacilli and bifidobacteria effects, immune responses and rotavirus vaccines and infection in different host species, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, 2016, 172, 72  crossref(new windwow)
11.
Nutritional management of gut health in pigs around weaning, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2007, 66, 02, 260  crossref(new windwow)
12.
Using combined probiotic to improve growth performance of weaned piglets on extensive farm conditions, Livestock Science, 2010, 134, 1-3, 249  crossref(new windwow)
13.
Recombinant plectasin elicits similar improvements in the performance and intestinal mucosa growth and activity in weaned pigs as an antibiotic, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 211, 216  crossref(new windwow)
14.
Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus dietary supplementation on the performance, intestinal barrier function, rectal microflora and serum immune function in weaned piglets challenged with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2015, 107, 4, 883  crossref(new windwow)
15.
Effect of swine based probiotic on performance, diarrhoea scores, intestinal microbiota and gut health of grower-finisher crossbred pigs, Livestock Science, 2017, 195, 74  crossref(new windwow)
16.
Isolation of lactic acid bacteria from swine milk and characterization of potential probiotic strains with antagonistic effects against swine-associated gastrointestinal pathogens, Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 2016, 62, 6, 514  crossref(new windwow)
17.
Probiotic roles of Lactobacillus sp. in swine: insights from gut microbiota, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2017, 122, 3, 554  crossref(new windwow)
18.
Lactobacillus reuteri I5007 modulates tight junction protein expression in IPEC-J2 cells with LPS stimulation and in newborn piglets under normal conditions, BMC Microbiology, 2015, 15, 1, 32  crossref(new windwow)
19.
Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus reuteri I5007, a probiotic strain isolated from healthy piglet, Journal of Biotechnology, 2014, 179, 63  crossref(new windwow)
20.
Influence of Lactobacillus fermentum I5007 on the intestinal and systemic immune responses of healthy and E. coli challenged piglets, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2009, 96, 1, 89  crossref(new windwow)
21.
The use of Lactobacillus as an alternative of antibiotic growth promoters in pigs: A review, Animal Nutrition, 2017, 3, 1, 1  crossref(new windwow)
22.
Efficacy of probiotics from anaerobic microflora with prebiotics on growth performance and noxious gas emission in growing pigs, Animal Science Journal, 2011, 82, 2, 282  crossref(new windwow)
23.
The Effect of Lactobacillus isolates on growth performance, immune response, intestinal bacterial community composition of growing Rex Rabbits, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2017  crossref(new windwow)
24.
Characterization of the most abundant Lactobacillus species in chicken gastrointestinal tract and potential use as probiotics for genetic engineering, Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 2014, 46, 7, 612  crossref(new windwow)
25.
2-DE and MS analysis of interactions betweenLactobacillus fermentum I5007 and intestinal epithelial cells, ELECTROPHORESIS, 2007, 28, 23, 4330  crossref(new windwow)
26.
Effects of dietary supplementation of selenium-enriched probiotics on production performance and intestinal microbiota of weanling piglets raised under high ambient temperature, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2015, 99, 6, 1161  crossref(new windwow)
27.
Free radical scavenging activity of Lactobacillus fermentum in vitro and its antioxidative effect on growing-finishing pigs, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2009, 107, 4, 1140  crossref(new windwow)
28.
Effects of dietary supplementation with freshwater microalgae on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and gut health in weaned piglets, animal, 2017, 11, 02, 183  crossref(new windwow)
29.
Effect of direct-fed microbial on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal noxious gas emission, fecal microbial flora and diarrhea score in weanling pigs, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 200, 86  crossref(new windwow)
30.
Fermentation conditions influence the fatty acid composition of the membranes ofLactobacillus reuteriI5007 and its survival following freeze-drying, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2014, 59, 4, 398  crossref(new windwow)
31.
Effects of Lactobacillus brevis preparation on growth performance, fecal microflora and serum profile in weaned pigs, Livestock Science, 2015, 178, 251  crossref(new windwow)
32.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE: Impact of inulin and a multispecies probiotic formulation on performance, microbial ecology and concomitant fermentation patterns in newly weaned piglets, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2010, 94, 5, e164  crossref(new windwow)
33.
Dietary supplementation with lactose or artificial sweetener enhances swine gut Lactobacillus population abundance, British Journal of Nutrition, 2014, 111, S1, S30  crossref(new windwow)
34.
Probiotic properties of genetically engineered Lactobacillus plantarum producing porcine lactoferrin used as feed additive for piglets, Process Biochemistry, 2016, 51, 6, 719  crossref(new windwow)
35.
Dietary Enterococcus faecalis LAB31 Improves Growth Performance, Reduces Diarrhea, and Increases Fecal Lactobacillus Number of Weaned Piglets, PLOS ONE, 2015, 10, 1, e0116635  crossref(new windwow)
36.
Determination of an economical medium for growth ofLactobacillus fermentumusing response surface methodology, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2009, 49, 5, 556  crossref(new windwow)
37.
Small intestinal segment perfusion test in piglets: future applications in studying probiotics-gut crosstalk in infectious diarrhoea?, Beneficial Microbes, 2010, 1, 4, 439  crossref(new windwow)
38.
Expression of catalase in Lactobacillus fermentum and evaluation of its anti-oxidative properties in a dextran sodium sulfate induced mouse colitis model, World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 29, 12, 2293  crossref(new windwow)
39.
The Use of Lactic Acid Bacteria as a Probiotic in Swine Diets, Pathogens, 2015, 4, 1, 34  crossref(new windwow)
40.
Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial and noxious gas emission in weaning pigs, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2017, 97, 4, 1310  crossref(new windwow)
41.
Study and use of the probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in pigs: a review, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2015, 6, 1  crossref(new windwow)
42.
Weaning — A challenge to gut physiologists, Livestock Science, 2007, 108, 1-3, 82  crossref(new windwow)
43.
Effects of Enterococcus faecium and Bacillus cereus var. toyoi on the morphology of the intestinal mucous membrane in piglets, Biologia, 2006, 61, 6  crossref(new windwow)
44.
A new strategy to applyBacillus subtilisMA139 for the production of solid-state fermentation feed, Letters in Applied Microbiology, 2009, 49, 2, 229  crossref(new windwow)
45.
Effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus supplementation in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, fecal microbiota shedding, and fecal noxious gas emission in weaning pigs, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 219, 181  crossref(new windwow)
46.
Inulin and probiotics in newly weaned piglets: effects on intestinal morphology, mRNA expression levels of inflammatory marker genes and haematology, Archives of Animal Nutrition, 2010, 64, 4, 304  crossref(new windwow)
47.
Dietary supplementation withLactobacillus fermentumI5007 improves the anti-oxidative activity of weanling piglets challenged with diquat, Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2013, 114, 6, 1582  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, DC.

2.
Bechman, T. J., J. V. Chambers and M. D. Cunningham. 1977. Influence of Lactobacillus acidophilus on performance of young dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 60:74 abs.

3.
Blomberg, L., A. Henriksson and P. L. Conway. 1993. Inhibition of adhesion of Escherichia coli K88 to piglet ileal mucus by Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:34-39.

4.
Chen, T. Sh. 1995. Manufacture and Application of Microbiological Medium. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, P. R. China (Chinese).

5.
Ehrmann, M. A., P. Kurzak, J. Bauer and R. F. Vogel. 2002. Characterization of Lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:966-975.

6.
Ewing, W. N. and D. J. A. Cole. 1994. The Living Gut. Context Publishing.

7.
Fahy, V. A., D. Connaughton, S. J. Driesen and E. M. Spicer. 1987. Post-weaning colibacillosis, in Manipulating Pig Production,(ed. APSA Committee), Australian Pig Science Association, Werribee, Victoria, Australia, pp. 189-201.

8.
Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animal. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378.

9.
GB/G 18246-2000. 2000. Standard method to determine amino acid content in feed. Chinese Quality Technical Superintend Bureau, Beijing.

10.
Guarner, F. and G. J. Schaafsma. 1998. Probiotics. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 39:237-238.

11.
Hart, G. K. and G. J. Dobb. 1988. Effect of a fecal bulking agent on diarrhea during enteral feeding in the critically ill. J. Parenter. Enteral. Nutr. 12:465-468.

12.
Hoefling, D. 1989. Tracking the culprits behind diarrhea in neonatal pigs. Vet. Med. 4: -427.

13.
Huis in’t Veld, J. H. J. and R. Havenaar. 1993. Selection criteria for microorganisms for probiotic use. In: FLAIR No.1 6 Prevention and Control of Potentially Pathogenic Microorganisms in Poultry and Poultry Meat Processing. Proceedings, 12. Probiotics and Pathogenicity (Ed. J. F. Jensen, M. H.l Hinton and R. W. A. W. Mulder) COVP-DLO Het Spelderholt, D. A. Beekbergen, Netherlands, pp. 11-19.

14.
Jensen, M. T., R. P. Cox and B. B. Jensen. 1995. Microbial production of skatole in the hindgut of pigs fed different diets and its relation to skatole deposition in back fat. J. Anim. Sci. 61:293-304.

15.
Kidder, D. E. and M. J. Manners. 1978. Digestion in the pig. Scientechnica, Bristol.

16.
Kornegay, E. T. 1986. Effect of dosing or feeding Lactobacillus acidophilus on blood cholesterol levels and growth rate of weanling and growing pigs. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Animal Science Research Report, No. 5, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA, pp. 14-19.

17.
Xuan, Z. N., J. J. Kim, K. N. Heo, H. J. Jung, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Han, Y. Y. Kim and In K. Han. 2001. Study on the development of a probivitics complex for weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14(10):1425-1428.

18.
Levy, S. B. 1992. The Antibiotic Paradox. How Miracle Drugs are Destroying the Miracle. New York: Plenum Press.

19.
McCarthy, J. F., F. X. Aherne and D. B. Okai. 1974. Use of HCl insoluble ash as an index material for determining apparent digestibility with pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 54:107-109.

20.
Metchnikoff, E. 1908. The Prolongation of Life. (Translation by P. C. Mitchell) C. P. Putnam’s Sons, New York, USA, pp. 89-95.

21.
Mollgaard, H. 1946. On Phytic acid, its importance in metabolism and its enzymic cleavage in bread supplemented with calcium. Biochem. J. 40:589-603.

22.
Muralidhara, K. S., G. G. Sheggeby and P. R. Elliker. 1977. Effect of feeding Lactobacilli on the coliform and Lactobacillus flora of intestinal tissue and feces from piglets. J. Food Protect. 40:288-295.

23.
NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

24.
Nurmi, E. and M. Rantala. 1973. New aspects of Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature. 241:210-211.

25.
Paul, W. J. J., van der Wielen, S. Biesterveld, S. Notermans, H. Hofstra, B. A. P. Urlings and F. van Knapen. 2000. Role of volatile fatty acids in development of the cecal microflora in broiler chickens during growth. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2536-2540.

26.
Pollman, D. S. 1986. Probiotics in pig diets, in Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (Ed. W. Haresign and D. J. A. Cole), Butterworth, London, pp. 193-205.

27.
Pollman, D. S., D. M. Danielson and E. R. Peo. 1980. Effects of microbial feed additives on performance of starter and growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 51:577-581.

28.
Premi, L. and V. Bottazzi. 1974. Use of Lactobacilli in the control of intestinal disturbances of pigs. Proc. XIX Int. Dairy Congr. 1974. India. 1 D. p. 89.

29.
Rojas, M. and P. L. Conway. 1996. Colonization by Lactobacilli of piglet small intestinal mucus. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 81:474-480.

30.
Silva, M., N. V. Jacobus, C. Deneke and S. L. Gorbach. 1987. Antimicrobial substance from a human Lactobacillus strain. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31:1231-1233.

31.
Tortuero, F. 1973. Influence of implantation of Lactobacillus acidophilus in chicks on the growth, feed conversion, malabsorption of fats syndrome and intestinal flora. Poult. Sci. 52:197-203.

32.
Watkins, B. A., B. F. Miller and D. H. Neil. 1982. In vivo inhibitory effects of Lactobacillus acidophilus against pathogenic Escherichia coli in gnotobiotic chicks. Poult. Sci. 61:1298-1308.

33.
Winkelstein, A. 1956. L. acidophilus tablets in the therapy of functional intestinal disorders. Am. Practitioner Dig. Treatment. 7:1637-1639.