JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Estimation of Correlation Coefficients between Histological Parameters and Carcass Traits of Pig Longissimus Dorsi Muscle
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Estimation of Correlation Coefficients between Histological Parameters and Carcass Traits of Pig Longissimus Dorsi Muscle
Ryu, Y.C.; Rhee, M.S.; Kim, B.C.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the histochemical parameters of muscle fibers, and to estimate the correlation between these histological parameters and carcass traits in pigs. A total of 230 crossbred Duroc(YorkshireLandrace) pigs (149 gilts and 81 castrated male pigs) was evaluated. Carcass traits (carcass weight, backfat thickness, and loin eye area), muscle fiber size (crosssectional area, diameter, and perimeter), muscle fiber number (density of fibers/ and total number of fibers), and fiber type composition (percentages of myofibers and relative areas of each fiber type) were evaluated. Mean cross-sectional area (CSA) and type IIB fiber CSA were positively correlated to carcass weight, backfat thickness and loin eye area. Mean fiber CSA was mostly related to type IIB CSA (r=0.98) as a result of the high percentage of type IIB fibers in the longissimus muscle. Correlations between fiber diameters and perimeters were also high, and showed similar results with CSA. Mean fiber density was negatively correlated to carcass weight (r=-0.24), backfat thickness (r=-0.18) and loin eye area (r=-0.27). To the contrary, total fiber number was positively correlated with carcass weight (r=0.27) and loin eye area (r=0.53). Carcass weight and loin eyZe area were not significantly related to muscle fiber composition. For backfat thickness, there was an opposition between type IIA percentage, which was positively related and type IIB percentage, which was negatively related. Fiber type composition of type I and IIA fibers were negatively correlated to that of type IIB fibers (r=-0.67 to -0.74). In the present study, carcass weight and loin eye area were positively correlated to CSA and negatively correlated to fiber density. But, these relationships were generally low. The fiber density was strongly affected by muscle fiber size and the total fiber number was affected either by CSA of muscle fiber and loin eye area. Fiber type composition was much more related to their numerical abundance than their CSA.
 Keywords
Carcass Traits;Skeletal Muscle;Muscle Fiber Characteristics;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Possible Muscle Fiber Characteristics in the Selection for Improvement in Porcine Lean Meat Production and Quality,;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 10, pp.1529-1534 crossref(new window)
2.
Muscle Fiber Characteristics and Their Relationship to Water Holding Capacity of Longissimus dorsi Muscle in Brahman and Charolais Crossbred Bulls,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2010. vol.23. 5, pp.665-671 crossref(new window)
3.
Effects of Maternal Nutrition during Pregnancy on the Body Weight, Muscle Fiber Number, Carcass Traits, and Pork Quality Traits of Offspring,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2010. vol.23. 7, pp.965-971 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Brocks, L., R. E. Klont, W. Buist, K. De Greef, M. Tieman and B. Engel. 2000. The effects of selection of pigs on growth rate vs. leanness on histochemical characteristics of different muscles. J. Anim. Sci. 78:1247-1254.

2.
Brooke, M. H. and K. K. Kaiser. 1970. Muscle fiber types: how many and what kind? Arch. Neurol. 23:369-379.

3.
Candek-Potokar, M., L. Lefaucheur, B. Zlender and M. Bonneau. 1999. Effect of slaughter weight and/or age on histological characteristics of pig longissimus dorsi muscle as related to meat quality. Meat Sci. 52:195-203.

4.
Chang, K. C., N. Da Costa, R. Blackley, O. Southwood, G. Evans, G. Plastow, J. D. Wood and R. I. Richardson. 2003. Relationships of myosin heavy chain fibre types to meat quality traits in traditional and modern pigs. Meat Sci. 64:93- 103.

5.
Dwyer, C. M., J. M. Fletcher and N. C. Stickland. 1993. Muscle cellularity and postnatal growth in the pig. J. Anim. Sci. 71:3339-3343.

6.
Fiedler, I., K. Ender, M. Wicke and G. Von Lengerken. 1993. Relationships between micro-structure of muscle tissue and stress susceptibility in Landrace pigs (halothane sensitivity). Arch. Anim. Breed. 36:525-538.

7.
Fiedler, I., K. Nurnberg, T. Hardge, G. Nurnberg and K. Ender. 2003. Phenotypic variations of muscle fibre and intramuscular fat traits in Longissimus muscle of F2 population Duroc${\times}$Berlin miniature pig and relationships to meat quality. Meat Sci. 63:131-139.

8.
Gentry, J. G., J. J. McGlone, J. R. Blanton Jr. and M. G. Miller. 2002. Impact of spontaneous exercise on performance, meat quality, and muscle fiber characteristics of growing/finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2833-2839.

9.
Highley, J. R., M. M. Esiri, B. McDonald, H. C. Roberts, M. A. Walker and T. J. Crow. 1999. The size and fiber composition of the anterior commissure with respect to gender and schizophrenia. Biol. Psychiatry 45:1120-1127.

10.
Henckel, P., N. Oksbjerg, E. Erlandsen, P. Barton-Gade and C. Bejerholm. 1997. Histo- and biochemical characteristics of the longissimus dorsi muscle in pigs and their relationships to performance and meat quality. Meat Sci. 47:311-321.

11.
Karlsson, A. H., R. E. Klont and X. Fernandez. 1999. Skeletal muscle fibres as factors for pork quality. Livest. Prod. Sci. 60:255-269.

12.
Klont, R. E., L. Brocks and G. Eikelenboom. 1998. Muscle fibre type and meat quality. Meat Sci. 49:S219-S229.

13.
Larzul, C., L. Lefaucheur, P. Ecolan, J. Gogue, A. Talmant, P. Sellier, P. Le Roy and G. Monin. 1997. Phenotypic and genetic parameters for longissimus muscle fiber characteristics in relation to growth, carcass and meat quality traits in Large White pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 75:3126-3137.

14.
Lind, A. and D. Kernell. 1991. Myofibrillar ATPase histochemistry of rat skeletal muscle: A 'Two-dimensional' quantitative approach. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 39:589-597.

15.
Miller, L. R., V. A. Garwood and M. D. Judge. 1975. Factors affecting porcine muscle fiber type, diameter and number. J. Anim. Sci. 41:66-77.

16.
Peter, J. B., R. J. Barnard, V. R. Edgerton, C. A. Gillespie and K. E. Stempel. 1972. Metabolic profiles of three fiber types of skeletal muscle in guinea pigs and rabbits. Biochem. 11:2627-2633.

17.
Rosser, B. W. C., B. J. Norris and P. M. Nemeth. 1992. Metabolic capacity of individual muscle fibers from different anatomic locations. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 40:819-825.

18.
Ruusunen, M. and E. Puolanne. 1997. Comparison of histochemical properties of different pig breeds. Meat Sci. 45:119-125.

19.
SAS. 1996. SAS/$STAT^{\circledR}$ User's Guide (Release 6.12). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary. NC.

20.
Stickland, N. C. and S. E. Handel. 1986. The numbers and types of muscle fibres in large and small breeds of pigs. J. Anat. 147:181-189.