JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Efficiency of Calf Production from Twin-bearing Beef Cows on an Intensive Pasture System in Subtropical Australia
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Efficiency of Calf Production from Twin-bearing Beef Cows on an Intensive Pasture System in Subtropical Australia
Hennessy, D.W.; Wilkins, J.F.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Forty-two single-bearing and 42 twin-bearing mature AngusHereford cows were allocated, seven per cell to 3 replications of 2 stocking rates (3.2 cows/ha; medium stocking rate [MSR], and 3.8 cows/ha; high stocking rate [HSR]) to graze summer-active and winter-active pastures from late pregnancy to the weaning of their calves. Cow liveweights and growth of calves were recorded as well as estimates of pasture quantity and forage intake. Pasture quantity did not differ in the paddocks grazed by single- and twin-bearing cows during pregnancy, nor effectively did forage intake. Subsequently, intake was higher during mid-lactation especially with twin-rearing cows (25% higher than single-rearing cows at the MSR; 9% at the HSR). However, quantity of pasture decreased for twin-rearing cows and was less than that available to single-rearing cows as lactation progressed. Liveweights of twinrearing cows decreased by 16% from late pregnancy to weaning at the MSR, and by 14% at the HSR, compared to decreases of 1% for single-rearing cows. Twin calves were lighter at birth, had slower growth rates, and were lighter at weaning than single calves. In spite of weaning smaller calves twinning increased the output (kg of calf weaned) per cow and per ha, and increased the efficiency (kg calf weaned per unit of forage eaten by the cow) over single calf production by 46% at the MSR and by 58% at the HSR. Twinning also increased the marginal returns from investment in high input pastures required by the enterprise.
 Keywords
Twinning;Forage Intake;Pastures;Calf Growth;Efficiency;Beef Cattle;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alexander, R. H. and M. McGowan. 1961. A filtration procedure for the in vitro determination of digestibility of herbage. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 16:275-77.

2.
Barlow, R., K. J. Ellis, P. J. Williamson, P. Costigan, P. D. Stephenson, G. Rose and P. T. Mears. 1988. Dry-matter intake of hereford and first-cross cows by controlled release of chromic oxide on three pasture systems. J. Agric. Sci. 110:217-31.

3.
Bindon, B. M., T. O’Shea, K. Miyamoto, M. A. Hillard, L. R. Piper, R. D. Nethery and G. Uphill. 1988. Superovulation in pubertal heifers immunized against ovine inhibin purified by monoclonal antibody affinity chromatography. Proc. Aust. Soc. Reprod. Biol. 20:28.

4.
Earle, D. F. and A. A. McGowan. 1979. Valuation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture management. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 19:337-343.

5.
Ellis, K. J., R. H. Laby, P. Costigan, K. Zirkler and P. G. Choice. 1982. Continuous administration of chromic oxide to grazing cattle. Proc. Nutr. Soc. of Australia. 7:177.

6.
Farquharson, R. J. 1990. An ex ante assessment at the farm level of a new production technology, M. Ec. Thesis, The Uni. New Engl., Armidale, Australia.

7.
Ferret, A., J. Gasa, G. Caja and P. Prio. 1998. Voluntary dry-matter intake and digesta kinetics of twin- or single-bearing Manchega ewes given Italian ryegrass hay or alfalfa hay in late pregnancy. Anim. Sci. 67 (Part 3):559-566.

8.
Forage, R. G., C. G. Tsonis, R. W. Brown, J. W. Hungerford, P. E. Greenwood and J. K. Findlay. 1993. Inhibin: a novel fecundity vaccine. In Animal Health and Production for the 21st Century, (Ed. K. J. Beh), pp. 122-130, CSIRO Publishing: East Melbourne, Australia.

9.
Gleeson, T., D. McDonald, S. Hooper and P. Martin. 2003. Australian Beef Industry 2003. In Report on the Australian Agricultural and Grazing Industries Survey of Beef Producers, ABARE Research Report 03.3, Canberra.

10.
Gordon, I. 1996. Induction of twin births in cattle. In 'Controlled reproduction in cattle and buffaloes' (Ed. Ian Gordon) pp. 372-416 (CAB International: Wallingford, UK).

11.
Gordon, I. 1997. Increasing litter size in pigs. In 'Controlled reproduction in pigs' (Ed. Ian Gordon) pp. 164-182 (CAB International: Wallingford, UK).

12.
Guerra-Martinez, P., G. E. Dickerson, G. B. Anderson and R. D. Green. 1990. Embryo-transfer twinning and performance efficiency in beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 68:4039-4050.

13.
Haydock, K. P. and N. H. Shaw. 1975. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 15:663-670.

14.
O'Shea, T., M. A. Hillard, S. T. Anderson, B. M. Bindon, J. K. Findlay, C. G. Tsonis and J. F. Wilkins. 1994. Inhibin immunization for increased ovulation rate and superovulation. Theriogenol. 41:3-17.

15.
Payne, R. W. and G. M. Arnold. 1997. Genstat 5 Release 4.1, Genstat 5 Committee, Numerical Algorithms Group, Clarendon Press: Oxford, United Kingdom.

16.
Robinson, J. J. 1996. Nutrition and reproduction. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 42:25-34.

17.
SCA. 1990. Feeding Standards for Australian Livestock: Ruminants, CSIRO Publications: East Melbourne, Australia.

18.
Stevenson, J. S., G. C. Lamb, D. P. Hoffmann and J. E. Minton. 1997. Interrealtionships of lactation and postpartum anovulation in suckled and milked cows. Livest. Prod. Sci. 50:57-74.

19.
Suzuki, O., M. Aoki and K. Kimura. 1998. Twin production by embryo transfer in Japanese Black-Holstein crossbred cows. Japan Agric. Res. Quart. 32:131-138.

20.
Terrill, C. E. 1975. Sheep. In 'Reproduction in farm animals' (Ed. E. S. E. Hafez) pp. 265-274. (Lea and Febiger: Philadelphia).

21.
Williams, J. H. A., D. C. Erson and D. D. Kress. 1979. Milk production in Hereford cattle. 1. Effects of separation interval on weigh-suckle-weigh milk production estimates. J. Anim. Sc. 49:1438-1442.