JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Nutrition Practice to Alleviate the Adverse Effects of Stress on Laying Performance, Metabolic Profile and Egg Quality in Peak Producing Hens: II. The Probiotic Supplementation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Nutrition Practice to Alleviate the Adverse Effects of Stress on Laying Performance, Metabolic Profile and Egg Quality in Peak Producing Hens: II. The Probiotic Supplementation
Hayirli, Armagan; Esenbuga, N.; Macit, M.; Yoruk, M.A.; Yildiz, A.; Karaca, H.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
In this experiment, the effects of cage density (CD) and probiotic supplementation (PS) on laying performance, metabolic profile, and egg quality in peak-producing hens were evaluated. After blocking according to the cage location, Lohman layers (n = 180, 46 wks of age) were allocated randomly to two levels of CD (540 vs. 360 /hen) and three levels of PS (0, 0.15, and 0.30%). Probiotic contained Enterococcus faecium culture (1010 cfu/g). Egg production (EP) and feed consumption (FC) were measured daily; egg weight (EW) was measured bi-weekly; BW was measured before and after the experiment; and blood samples were obtained at the end of the experiment. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Increasing CD decreased FC (125.0 vs. 120.8 g/d, p<0.0001) and FCR (1.93 vs. 1.87, p<0.0001) and did not alter EP, EW, and BW. Increasing level of PS linearly decreased FC (p<0.02) and FCR (p<0.006). Averages were 123.9, 123.2, and 121.6 g/d for FC and 1.91, 1.92, and 1.86 for FCR in hens supplemented with 0, 0.15, and 0.30% probiotic, respectively. Hens placed in high-density cages had greater serum corticosterone concentration than hens placed in normal-density cages (12.8 vs. 11.3 g/dL, p<0.04); CD did not affect concentrations of other metabolites. Increasing level of PS linearly increased serum glucose, albumin, and creatine concentrations and quadratically increased total protein, globulin, Ca, and P concentrations. Average concentrations (mg/dL) were 260, 297, and 305 for glucose; 6.28, 8.09, and 7.58 for total protein; 1.98, 2.48, and 2.38 for albumin; 4.30, 5.62, and 5.19 for globulin; 0.40, 0.52, and 0.54 for creatine; 16.0, 16.5, and 16.3 for Ca; and 6.27, 8.14, and 7.17 for P in hens supplemented with 0, 0.15, and 0.30% probiotic, respectively. There was no effect of CD on egg quality. Increasing level of PS linearly improved yolk color (YC) and quadratically increased albumen index (AI) and Haugh unit (HU). The mean values were 9.67, 9.75, and 10.58 for YC; 8.94, 6.93, and 8.72% for AI; and 85.6, 74.9, and 82.9 for HU for hens supplemented with 0, 0.15, and 0.30% probiotic, respectively. There was also CD by PS effect on FC, EP, and serum glucose, total protein, albumin, globulin, creatine, Ca and P concentrations. In conclusion, increased CD partially depressed laying performance and caused stress. Probiotic supplementation improved laying performance and metabolic profile. It also partially alleviated the adverse effects of stress resulting from increased caging density.
 Keywords
Cage Density;Probiotic;Laying Performance;Metabolic Profile;Egg Quality;Peak-producing Hens;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Physiological Profile of Growing Rats: Effects of Cage Type and Cage Density,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2007. vol.20. 2, pp.263-272 crossref(new window)
2.
Probiotics in Drinking Water Alleviate Stress of Induced Molting in Feed-deprived Laying Hens,;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 8, pp.1196-1200 crossref(new window)
3.
The Effects of Raw and Physical Processed Common Vetch Seed (Vicia sativa) on Laying Performance, Egg Quality, Metabolic Parameters and Liver Histopatology of Laying Hens,;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2011. vol.24. 10, pp.1425-1434 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Altan, A., S. Ozkan, K. Ozkan, Y. Akbaş and V. Ayhan. 2002. Effects of cage density on the performance of laying hens during high summer temperatures. Turk J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 26:695-700.

2.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th end. Association of Official Analytical Chemist. Arlington, Virginia.

3.
Balevi, T., U. S. Ucan, B. Coskun, V. Kurtoglu and I. S. Cetingul. 2001. Effect of dietary probiotic on performance and humoral immune response in layer hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 42:456-461.

4.
Bell, A. E., W. M. Muir and D. W. Olson. 1983. Performance of dwarf and normal laying hens as influenced by protein and cage density. Poult. Sci. 62:2130-2137.

5.
Beuving, G. and G. Vonder. 1977. Daily rhythm of corticosterone in laying hens and the influence on egg laying. J. Reprod. Fertil. 51:169-173.

6.
Bishop, R. J. 2004. Cage density effects on production and welfare of layers. A report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. Department of Agriculture Western Australia.

7.
Brake, J. D. and E. D. Peebles. 1992. Laying hen performance as affected by diet and caging density. Poult. Sci. 71:945-950.

8.
Byun, J. R. and Y. H. Yoon. 2003. Binding of aflatoxin G1, G2 and B2 by probiotic Lactobacillus spp. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:1686-1689.

9.
Carey, J. B. and F. L. Kuo. 1995. Effects of cage population on the productive performance of layer. Poult. Sci. 74:633-637.

10.
Cavazzoni, V., A. Adam and C. Castrovilli. 1998. Performance of broiler chickens supplemented with Bacillus coagulants as probiotic. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:526-529.

11.
Chateau, N., I. Castellanos and A. M. Deschamps. 1993. Distribution of pathogen inhibition in Lactobacillus isolates of a commercial probiotic consortium. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 74:36-40.

12.
Craig, J. V. and G. A. Milliken. 1989. Further studies of density and group size effects in caged hens of stocks differing in fearful behavior, productivity and behavior. Poult. Sci. 68:9-16.

13.
Craig, J. V., J. A. Craig and J. Vargas. 1986. Corticosteroids and other indicators of hens’ well-being in four laying environments. Poult. Sci. 65:856-863.

14.
Culbert, J. and J. W. Wells. 1975. Aspects of the adrenal function in the domestic fowl. J. Endocrinol. 65:363-376.

15.
Cunningham, D. L. 1988. Effects of population size and cage area on agonistic activity and social structure of White Leghorn layers. Poult. Sci. 67:198-204.

16.
Cunningham, D. L. and G. Gvaryahu. 1987. Effects on productivity and aggressive behavior of laying hens of solid versus wire cage partitions and bird density. Poult. Sci. 66:1583-1586.

17.
Cunningham, D. L., A. van Tienhoven and G. Gvaryahu. 1988. Population size, cage area, and dominance rank effects on productivity and well-being of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 67:399-406.

18.
Dafwang, I. I., M. E. Cook and M. L. Sunde. 1987. Interaction of dietary antibiotic supplementation and stocking density on broiler chick performance and immune response. Br. Poult. Sci. 28:47-55.

19.
Dawkins, M. S., C. A. Donnelly and T. A. Jones. 2004. Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking density. Nature 427:342-344.

20.
Davami, A., M. J. Wineland, W. T. Jones and R. L. Ilardi. 1987. Peterson. Effects of population size, floor space, and feeder space upon performance, external appearance, and plasma corticosterone concentration of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 66:251-257.

21.
Davis, G. S. 1996. The effects of a direct-fed microbial on body weights and feed efficiency in Bobwhite quail. Gamebird Bull. 29:1-6.

22.
Davis, G. S. and K. E. Anderson. 2002. The effects of feeding the direct-fed microbial, Primalac, on growth parameters and egg production in single comb White Leghorn hens. Poult. Sci. 81:755-759.

23.
Davis, G. S. and M. E. Qureshi. 1997. PrimaLac affects immune function of Bobwhite quail. Wildlife Harvest. 28:54-56.

24.
Davis, G. S., K. E. Anderson and A. S. Carroll. 2000. The effects of long-term caging and molt of Single Comb White Leghorn hens on heterophil to lymphocyte ratios, corticosterone and throid hormones. Poult. Sci. 79:514-518.

25.
Dierck, N. A. 1989. Biotechnology aids to improve feed and feed digestion: enzymes and fermentation. Arch. Anim. Nutr. Berl. 39:241-261.

26.
Ehrmann, M. A., P. Kurzak, J. Bauer and R. F. Vogel. 2002. Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J. Appl. Microbiol. 92:966-975.

27.
Endo, T., M. Nakano, S. Shimizu, M. Fukushima and S. Miyoshi. 1999. Effects of probiotic on the lipid metabolism of cocks fed on a cholesterol-enriched diet. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 63:1569-1575.

28.
Ergun, A. S. Yalcin, İ. colpan, T. Dikicioglu and S. Yildiz. 1987. Utilization of vetch by laying hens. J. Fac. Vet. Med. Univ. Ankara 34:449-466.

29.
Fairchild, A. S., J. L. Grimes, F. T. Jones, M. J. Wineland, F. W. Edens and A. E. Sefton. 2001. Effects of hen age, Bio-Mos$^{\circledR}$ and Flavomycin$^{\circledR}$ on poult susceptibility to oral Escherichia coli challenge. Poult. Sci. 80:562-571.

30.
Fulton, R. M., B. N. Nersessian and W. M. Reed. 2002. Prevention of Salmonella enteritidis infection in commercial ducklings by oral chicken egg-derived antibody alone or in combination with probiotics. Poult. Sci. 81:34-40.

31.
Grimes, J. L., D. V. Maurice, S. F. Lightsey and J. G. Lopez. 1997. The effect of dietary Fermacto on layer hen performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 6:399-403.

32.
Gross, W. B. and H. S. Siegel. 1983. Evaluation of the heterophil/lymphocyte ratio as a measure of stress in chickens. Avian Dis. 27:972-929.

33.
Harms, R. H. and R. D. Miles. 1988. Research note: Influence of Fermacto on the performance of laying hens when fed diets with different levels of methionine. Poult. Sci. 67:842-844.

34.
Havenstein, G. B., V. D. Toelle, R. H. Towner and A. Emsley. 1989. Effects of genetic strain, slow versus rapid-feathering maternal genotype, and cage density on the performance of Single Comb White Leghorns. Poult. Sci. 68:596-607.

35.
Heckert, R. A., I. Estevez, E. Russek-Cohen and R. Petit-Riley. 2002. Effects of density and perch availability on the immune status of broilers. Poult. Sci. 81:451-457.

36.
Hester, P. Y. and E. K. Wilson. 1986. Performance of White Leghorn hens in response to cage density and the introduction of cage mates. Poult. Sci. 65:2029-2033.

37.
Hughes, B. O. 1975. The concept of an optimum stocking density and its selection for egg production. In Economic factors affecting egg production (Ed. B. M. Freeman and K. N. Boorman). British Poultry Science Ltd., Edinburgh. pp. 271-298.

38.
Jadamus, A., W. Vahjen and O. Simon. 2001. Growth behaviour of a spore forming probiotics strain in the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chicken and piglets. Arch. Tierernahr. 54:1-17.

39.
Jensen, L. S., C. H. Chang and D. V. Maurice. 1976. Liver lipid accumulation and performance of hens as affected by cage density and initial body weight. Poult. Sci. 55:1926-1932.

40.
Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 1996. Influence of dried Bacillus subtilis and Lactobacilli cultures on intestinal microflora and performance in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 9:397-404.

41.
Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 1998. Growth performance, intestinal microbial populations, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 77:1259-1265.

42.
Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 2000. Digestive and bacterial enzyme activities in broilers fed diets supplemented with Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 79:886-891.

43.
Koelkebeck, K. W. and J. R. Cain. 1984. Performance, behavior, plasma corticosterone, and economic returns of laying hens in several management alternatives. Poult. Sci. 63:2123-2131.

44.
Kumprecht, I. and P. Zobac. 1998. The effect of probiotic preparations containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Enterococcus faecium in diets with different levels of Bvitamins on chicken broiler performance. Zivocisna Vyroba 43:63-70.

45.
Lan, P. T., M. Sakamoto and Y. Benno. 2004. Effects of two probiotic lactobacillus strains on jejunal and cecal microbiota of broiler chicken under acute heat stress condition as revealed by molecular analysis of 16s RNA genes. Microbiol. Immunol. 48:917-929.

46.
Lee, K. and C. W. Moss. 1995a. Effects of population density on layer performance. Poult. Sci. 74:1754-1760.

47.
Lee, K. and C. W. Moss. 1995b. Effects of cage density on fearrelated behavioral response and activity of layers. Poult. Sci. 74:1426-1430.

48.
Mashaly, M. M., M. L. Webb, S. L. Youtz, W. B. Roush and H. B. Graves. 1984. Changes in serum corticosterone concentration of laying hens as a response to increased population density. Poult. Sci. 63:2271-2274.

49.
Mather, F. B. and E. W. Gleaves. 1970. Performance of commercial stocks of layers as influenced by cage density. Poult. Sci. 49:1412-1416.

50.
Mench, J. A., A. Van Tienhoven, J. A. Marsh, C. C. McCormik, D. L. Cunningham and R. C. Baker. 1986. Effects of cage and floor pen management on behavior, production, physiological stress responses of laying hens. Poult. Sci. 65:1058-1069.

51.
Mohan, B., R. Kadirvel, M. Bhaskaran and A. Natarajan. 1995. Effect of probiotic supplementation on serum/yolk cholesterol and on eggshell thickness in layers. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:799-803.

52.
Moinard, C., J. P. Morisse and J. M. Faure. 1998. Effect of cage area, cage height and perches on feather condition, bone breakage and mortality of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 39:198-202.

53.
Moran, Jr. E. T. 1986. Egg quality and hen performance responses to protein-calcium deficiency, cafeteria feeding, and cage density. Poult. Sci. 65:1153-1162.

54.
Nahashon, S. N., H. S. Nakaue and L. W. Mirosch. 1994. Production variables and nutrient retention in Single Comb White Leghorn laying pullets fed diets supplemented with direct-fed microbials. Poult. Sci. 73:1699-1711.

55.
National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry. 9th Ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

56.
Netherwood, T., H. J. Gilbert, D. S. Parker and A. G. O’Donnell. 1999. Probiotics shown to change bacterial community structure in the avian gastrointestinal tract. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:5134-5138.

57.
Odendaal, J. S. J. 1994. Veterinary ethology and animal welfare. Rev. Sci. Technol. Int. Epiz. 13:261-275.

58.
Onifade, A. A., A. A. Odunsi, G. M. Babatunde, B. R. Olorede and E. Muma. 1999. Comparison of the supplemental effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and antibiotics in low-protein and high-fiber diets fed to broiler chickens. Arch. Tierernahr. 52:29-39.

59.
Post, J., J. M. J. Rebel and A. A. H. M. ter Huurne. 2003. Physiological effects of elevated plasma corticosterone concentrations in broiler chickens. an alternative means by which to assess the physiological effects of stress. Poult. Sci. 82:1313-1318.

60.
Ramos, N. C., K. E. Anderson and A. W. Adams. 1986. Effects of type of cage partition, cage shape, and bird density on productivity and well-being of layers. Poult. Sci. 65:2023-2028.

61.
Roush, W. B., M. M. Mashaly and H. B. Graves. 1984. Effect of increased bird population in a fixed cage area on production and economic responses of single comb white leghorn laying hens. Poult. Sci. 63:45-48.

62.
Saleh, S. Y. and W. Jaksch. 1977. The effects of stress factors on blood leukocytic count, glucose and corticoids in chickens. Zbl. Vet. Med. A. 24:220-228.

63.
SAS Institute Inc. 1998. SAS$^{\circledR}$ User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 7th. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

64.
Schneitz, C., T. Kiiskinen, V. Toivonen and M. Näsi. 1998. Effect of Broilact$^{\circledR}$ on the physicochemical conditions and nutrient digestibility in the gastrointestinal tract of broilers. Poult. Sci. 77:426-432.

65.
Sohail, S. S., M. M. Bryant, S. K. Rao and D. A. Roland. 2001. Influence of cage density and prior dietary phosphorous requirement of commercial leghorns. Poult. Sci. 80:769-775.

66.
Waldroup, P. W., D. E. Greene, L. W. Luther and B. D. Jones. 1972. Response of turkey breeder hens to Vigofac and Fermacto supplementation. Poult. Sci. 51:510-513.

67.
Williams, K. C. 1992. Some factors affecting albumen quality with particular reference to Haugh unit score. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 48:5-16.

68.
Yeo, J. and K. Kim. 1997. Effect of feeding diets containing an antibiotic, a probiotic, or yucca extract on growth and intestinal urease activity in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 76:381-385.

69.
Yoruk, M. A., M. Gul, A. Hayirli and M. Macit. 2004. The effects of supplementation of humate and probiotic on egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period in hens. Poult. Sci. 83:84-88.

70.
Yung H. Y. and J. R. Byun. 2004. Occurrence of glutathione sulphydryl (GSH) and antioxidant activities in probiotic Lactobacillus spp. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1582-1585.

71.
Zulkifli, I., N. Abdullah, N. M. Azrin and Y. W. Ho. 2000. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:593-597.