Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Family Size and Genetic Correlation between Purebred and Crossbred Halfsisters on Response in Crossbred and Purebred Chickens under Modified Reciprocal Recurrent Selection
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Family Size and Genetic Correlation between Purebred and Crossbred Halfsisters on Response in Crossbred and Purebred Chickens under Modified Reciprocal Recurrent Selection
Singh, Neelam; Singh, Raj Pal; Sangwan, Sandeep; Malik, Baljeet Singh;
  PDF(new window)
Response in a modified reciprocal recurrent selection scheme for egg production was evaluated considering variable family sizes and genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred half sisters. The criteria of selection of purebred breeders included pullet's own performance, purebred full and half sisters and crossbred half sister's performance. Heritability of egg production of crossbreds (aggregate genotype) and purebred's was assumed to be 0.2 and genetic correlation between purebred and crossbred half sisters () as 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 1.0, -0.1, -0.2, -0.3, -0.4, -0.5 and -1.0. Number of dams per sire to produce purebred and crossbred progenies assumed to be 5, 6, 7, 8, while number of purebred female progeny () and crossbred progeny () per dam were considered to be 3, 4, 5 and 6 in each case. Considering phenotypic variance as unity, selection indices were constructed for different combinations of dams and progeny for each value of . Following selection index theory, response in crossbred and purebred for egg production was computed. Results indicated that response in crossbreds depended mainly on crossbred family size and also on magnitude of irrespective of its direction, and response was greater with large crossbred family size than the purebred families. Correlated response in purebreds depends both on magnitude and direction of and was expected to be greater with large purebred family size only. Inclusion of purebred information increased the accuracy of selection for crossbred response for higher magnitude of irrespective of its direction. Present results indicate that desirable response in both crossbred and purebred performance is a function of and family sizes. The ratio of crossbred and purebred family sizes can be optimized depending on the objective of improving the performance of crossbreds and/or of purebreds.
Response;Genetic Gain;M-RRS;Genetic Correlation;
 Cited by
Arthur, J. A. 1986. An evaluation of industry breeding programs for egg type chickens. Proc. of 3rd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 10:325-335.

Bell, A. E. 1982. Selection for heterosis-results with laboratory and domestic animals. Proc. 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 6:206-227.

Bell, A. E. and C. H. Moore. 1972. Reciprocal recurrent selection for pupal weight in Tribolium in comparison with conventional methods. Egyptian J. Genet. Cytol. 1:92-119.

Biswas, D. K. and J. V. Craig. 1969. Relationship between purebred and crossbred paternal half-sisters' performance in chickens. Poult. Sci. 48:524-526.

Brown, W. P. and A. E. Bell. 1980. An experimental comparison of selection alternatives to plateaued response. Genetics 94:477-496.

Comstock, R. E. 1961. Reciprocal recurrent selection with reference to swine breeding. Twenty second annual report, Regional Swine Breeding Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa.

Comstock, R. E. and H. F. Robinson. 1957. Finding relative to reciprocal recurrent selection. Proc. of International Genetics Symposium, Science Council of Japan, Tokyo pp. 461-464.

Cress, C. E. 1966. A comparison of recurrent selection systems. Genetics 54:1371-1379.

Hetzer, H. D., R. H. Miller and R. C. Kling. 1977. Effectiveness of RRS for improving preweaning performance in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 45:989-1009.

Hill, W. G. 1971. Theoretical aspects of crossbreeding. Annals de genetique et de selection Animale 3:23-24. crossref(new window)

Krehbiel, E. V., H. O. Hetzer, A. E. Flower, G. E. Dickerson, W. R. Harvey and L. A. Swiger. 1971. Effectiveness of reciprocal recurrent selection for performance of crosses between Montana No. 1 and Yorkshire swine. I. Preweaning traits. J. Anim. Sci. 32:191-210.

Pirchner, F. 1976. Genetic correlations between purebred and crossbred performance in poultry. Bulletin Technique, Department de Genetique Animale, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique No. 24: 63-67 (Anim. Breed Abstr. 45:420).

Pirchner, F. and C. M. Von Krosigk. 1973. Genetic parameters of cros- and purebred poultry. Br. Poult. Sci. 14:193-202.

Pirchner, F. and R. Mergl. 1977. Overdominance as cause for heterosis in poultry. J. Anim. Breed Genet. 94:151-158.

Robertson, A. 1971. Optimum utilization of genetic material with special reference to cross-breeding in relation to other methods of genetic improvement (Introduction report). Proc. of the Xth International Congress on Animal Production, Paris-vesailles, pp. 57-68.

Robertson, A. 1959. The sampling variance of the genetic correlation coefficient. Biometrics 15:469-485.

Sellier, P. 1982. Selecting populations for use in crossbreeding. Proc. of the 2nd World Congress on Genetics Applied to Animal Production, 6:15-49.

Singh, R. P. and L. Dempfle. 1989. Optimising multistage selection in a modified reciprocal recurrent selection programme considering cost and rate of genetic progress. Proc. of the 40th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production, Dublin, Vol. 1 (summaries), p. 167.

Singh, R. P. and J. Kumar. 1994. Biometrical Methods in Poultry Breeding. Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.

Vinson, W. E., E. J. Eison. and O. W. Robinson. 1969. Predicted response to selection for crossbred performance in mice. J. Anim. Sci. 28:725-733.

Wie, M. and H. A. M. van der Steen. 1991. Comparison of pureline selection with reciprocal recurrent selection system in animal breeding (a review). Anim. Breed Abstr. 59:281-298.

Wie, M. and J. H. J. van der Werf. 1994. Maximizing genetic response in crossbreds using both purebred and crossbred information. Anim. Prod. 59:401-413.

Wong, W. C., W. J. Boylan and W. E. Rempel. 1971. Purebred versus crossbred performance as a basis of selection in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 32:605-610.