JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence of Berseem and Lucerne Silages on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility and Milk Yield in Lactating Nili Buffaloes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Influence of Berseem and Lucerne Silages on Feed Intake, Nutrient Digestibility and Milk Yield in Lactating Nili Buffaloes
Sarwar, M.; Khan, M. Ajmal; Nisa, Mahr-un; Touqir, N.A.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate feeding value of berseem and lucerne silage as a replacement for conventional fodder (berseem fodder) in lactating Nili buffaloes. Fifteen early lactating multi-parous Nili buffaloes, five buffaloes in each group were allotted three experimental diets. Berseem and lucerne fodders were ensiled at 30% DM (wheat straw was used to adjust the DM of fodders) with molasses (at the rate of 2% of fodder DM) in two bunker silos for 30 days. The diets contained 75% DM from berseem fodder (BF), 75% DM from berseem silage (BS) and 75% DM from lucerne silage (LS). Each diet contained 25% concentrate DM. Diets were mixed daily and fed twice a day at ad libitum intakes. Dry matter intake (DMI) was significantly higher (13.8 kg/d) in buffaloes fed BF diet than those fed LS (12.5 kg/d) and BS (11.9 kg/day) diets. The differences in digestible DMI and DMI as percent body weight were significant between fodder and silage based diets but non-significant when BS and LS were compared. Lower DMI with silage-based diets was probably because of low silage pH. Intake of NDF (NDFI) was higher (5.68 kg/d) in buffaloes fed BF diet followed by those fed LS (5.50 kg/d) and BS (5.00 kg/d) diets. The difference was significant (p<0.05) across fodder and silage based diets but NDFI was non-significant across both silage-based diets. The apparent DM digestibility was significantly different (p<0.05) between fodder and silage-based diets but was non-significant between LS and BS diets. Four percent fat corrected milk yield was significantly different (p<0.05) between fodder and silage-based diets but was non-significant between LS and BS diets. Higher milk yield with fodder based diet was because of more digestible nutrient intake (Table 3) compared with silage based diets. Milk CP, TP and NPN and SNF did not show any treatment effects. The present results indicated that the berseem and lucerne fodder ensiled at 30% DM level with 2% molasses could safely replace (75% DM) the conventional leguminous fodder in the diets of lactating Nili buffaloes.
 Keywords
Silage;Berseem;Lucerne;Intake;Digestibility;Milk Yield;Nili Buffaloes;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Feeding Value of Jambo Grass Silage and Mott Grass Silage for Lactating Nili Buffaloes,;;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2007. vol.20. 4, pp.523-528 crossref(new window)
2.
Influence of Soil and Forage Minerals on Buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) Parturient Haemoglobinuria,;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2007. vol.20. 3, pp.393-398 crossref(new window)
3.
Effects of Alfalfa and Brown Mid-rib Corn Silage and Level of Forage Neutral Detergent Fiber on Animal Performance of Lactating Cows in Michigan,;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2007. vol.20. 3, pp.373-377 crossref(new window)
4.
Influence of Varying Dry Matter and Molasses Levels on Berseem and Lucerne Silage Characteristics and Their In situ Digestion Kinetics in Nili Buffalo Bulls,;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2007. vol.20. 6, pp.887-893 crossref(new window)
5.
Nutritional Management for Buffalo Production,;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2009. vol.22. 7, pp.1060-1068 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis (15th Ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, Virginia, USA.

2.
Baker, S. B. and W. H. Summerson. 1961. The calorimetric determination of lactic acid in biological material. J. Biol. Chem. 138:535.

3.
Bolsen, K. K., G. Ashbell and Z. Weinberg. 1996. Silage fermentation and silage additives-Review, Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 9:483.

4.
Chamberlain, D. G. and S. Roberston. 1992. The effects of the addition of various enzyme mixtures on the fermentation of perennial rye grass silage and on its nutritional value for milk production in dairy cows. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 37:257.

5.
Fransen, S. C. and F. J. Strubi. 1998. Relationships among absorbents on the reduction of grass silage effluent and silage quality. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2623.

6.
Higginbotham, G. E., S. C. Mullar, K. K. Bolsen and E. J. Depeters. 1998. Effects of inoculants containing propionic acid bacteria on fermentation and aerobic stability of corn silage. J. Dairy Sci. 81:2185.

7.
Jeon, B. T., S. H. Moon, S. M. Lee, K. H. Kim and R. H. Hudson. 2003. Voluntary intake, digestibility and nitrogen balance in spotted Deer (Cervus nippon) fed forest by-product silage, Oak leaf hay and commercial mixed ration. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(5):702.

8.
Khan, M. A., M. Sarwar, M. Nisa and M. S. Khan. 2004. Feeding value of urea treated corncobs ensiled with or with out enzose (corn dextrose) for lactating crossbred cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(8):1093.

9.
Khorasani, G. R., E. K. Okine, J. J. Kennelly and J. H. Helm. 1993. Effect of whole crop cereal grain silage substituted for alfalfa silage on performance of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3536.

10.
Nisa, M., M. Sarwar and M. A. Khan. 2004. Nutritive value of urea treated wheat straw ensiled with or without corn steep liquor for lactating Nili-ravi buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(6):825.

11.
NRC. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

12.
Ruiz, T. M., W. K. Sanchez, C. R. Straples and L. E. Sollenberger. 1992. Comparison of 'Mott' dwarf elephant grass silage and corn silage for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 75:533.

13.
Sarwar, M., J. L. Firkins and M. Eastridge. 1991. Effect of replacing neutral detergent fiber of forage with soy hulls and corn gluten feed for dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 74:1006.

14.
Sarwar, M. and Z. U. Hasan. 2001. Nutrient Metabolism in Ruminants. Friends Science Publishers, 399-B, Peoples colony # 1, Faisalabad, Pakistan. ISBN 969-8490-03-5.

15.
Sarwar, M., A. Sohaib, M. A. Khan and Mahr-un-Nisa. 2003a. Effect of feeding saturated fat on milk production and composition in crossbred dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(2):204.

16.
Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and M. Nisa. 2003b. Nitrogen retention and chemical composition of urea treated wheat straw ensiled with organic acids or fermentable carbohydrates. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(11):1583.

17.
Sarwar, M., M. A. Khan and M. Nisa. 2004. Influence of ruminally protected fat and urea treated corncobs on nutrient intake, digestibility, milk yield and its composition in Nili-Ravi buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(1):86.

18.
Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1984. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. (2nd Ed.) McGraw Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, USA.

19.
Sutton, J. D. 1989. Altering milk composition by feeding. J. Dairy Sci. 72:2801.

20.
Torotich, M. J. 1992. Minimizing the loss of ammonia during urea treatment of wheat straw for growing calves. M.Sc. Thesis, Haryana Agriculture University, Hissar, India.

21.
Van Keulen, J. and B. A. Young. 1977. Evaluation of acid insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. J. Anim. Sci. 44:282.

22.
Van Soest, P. J., H. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Method of dietary fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal material. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583.

23.
Yahaya, M. S., M. Goto, W. Yimiti, B. Smerjai and Y. Kawamoto. 2004. Evaluation of fermentation quality of a tropical and temperate forage crops ensiled with additives of fermented juice epiphytic lactic acid bacteria (FJLB). Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(7):942.