JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Influence of Fiber Content and Concentrate Level on Chewing Activity, Ruminal Digestion, Digesta Passage Rate and Nutrient Digestibility in Dairy Cows in Late Lactation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Influence of Fiber Content and Concentrate Level on Chewing Activity, Ruminal Digestion, Digesta Passage Rate and Nutrient Digestibility in Dairy Cows in Late Lactation
Tafaj, M.; Kolaneci, V.; Junck, B.; Maulbetsch, A.; Steingass, H.; Drochner, W.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The influence of fiber content of hay (low-fiber 47% NDF and high-fiber 62% NDF of DM) and concentrate level (high 50% and low 20% of ration DM) on chewing activity, passage rate and nutrient digestibility were tested on four restrict-fed (11.1 to 13.7 kg DM/d) Holstein cows in late lactation. Aspects of ruminal fermentation and digesta particle size distribution were also investigated on two ruminally cannulated (100 mm i.d.) cows of the same group of animals. All digestion parameters studied were more affected by the fiber content of the hay and its ratio to non structural carbohydrates than by the concentrate level. Giving a diet of high-fiber (62% NDF) hay and low concentrate level (20%) increased chewing activity but decreased solid passage rate and total digestibility of nutrients due to a limited availability of fermentable OM in the late cut fiber rich hay. A supplementation of high-fiber hay with 50% concentrate in the diet seems to improve the ruminal digestion of cell contents, whilst a depression of the ruminal fiber digestibility was not completely avoided. Giving a diet of low-fiber (47% NDF) hay and high concentrate level (50%) reduced markedly the chewing and rumination activity, affected negatively the rumen conditions and, consequently, the ruminal digestion of fiber. A reduction of the concentrate level from 50 to 20% in the diet of low-fiber hay improved the rumen conditions as reflected by an increase of the ruminal solid passage rate and of fiber digestibility and in a decrease of the concentration of large particles and of the mean particle size of the rumen digesta and of the faeces. Generally, it can be summarised that, (i) concentrate supplementation is not a strategy to overcome limitations of low quality (fiber-rich) hay, and (ii) increase of the roughage quality is an effective strategy in ruminant nutrition, especially when concentrate availability for ruminants is limited.
 Keywords
Dairy Cows;Chewing Activity;Rumen Digestion;Passage Rate;Hay/Concentrate-ratio;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Gelatinized Carbohydrates in the Diet of Catla catla Fingerlings: Effect of Levels and Sources on Nutrient Utilization, Body Composition and Tissue Enzyme Activities,;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2007. vol.20. 1, pp.89-99 crossref(new window)
2.
Effects of Rice Straw Particle Size on Chewing Activity, Feed Intake, Rumen Fermentation and Digestion in Goats,;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2009. vol.22. 9, pp.1256-1266 crossref(new window)
3.
Influence of Yeast Fermented Cassava Chip Protein (YEFECAP) and Roughage to Concentrate Ratio on Ruminal Fermentation and Microorganisms Using In vitro Gas Production Technique,;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2014. vol.27. 1, pp.36-45 crossref(new window)
4.
Effects of Moisture Content and Chopping Treatment of Rice Straw Silage on Particle Size and in situ Digestibility of Total Mixed Ration in Dairy Cows,;;;;

한국폐기물자원순환학회지, 2015. vol.32. 7, pp.693-704 crossref(new window)
1.
Seasonal variation in rumination parameters of free-ranging impalas Aepyceros melampus, Wildlife Biology, 2008, 14, 3, 372  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Intake, digestibility, performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of lambs fed different levels of crambe meal in the diet, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 216, 40  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Influence of N shortage and conjugated linoleic acid supplementation on some productive, digestive, and metabolic parameters of lactating cows, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 208, 86  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Implications of feed concentrate reduction in organic grassland-based dairy systems: a long-term on-farm study, animal, 2017, 1  crossref(new windwow)
5.
Effects of different sources of forage in high-concentrate diets on fermentation parameters, ruminal biohydrogenation and microbiota in Nellore feedlot steers, The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2016, 154, 05, 928  crossref(new windwow)
6.
Influence of Yeast Fermented Cassava Chip Protein (YEFECAP) and Roughage to Concentrate Ratio on Ruminal Fermentation and Microorganisms Using <italic>In vitro</italic> Gas Production Technique, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014, 27, 1, 36  crossref(new windwow)
7.
Effects of Varying Dietary Forage Particle Size in Two Concentrate Levels on Chewing Activity, Ruminal Mat Characteristics, and Passage in Dairy Cows, Journal of Dairy Science, 2007, 90, 4, 1929  crossref(new windwow)
8.
Balancing diets for physically effective fibre and ruminally degradable starch: A key to lower the risk of sub-acute rumen acidosis and improve productivity of dairy cattle, Livestock Science, 2010, 127, 1, 1  crossref(new windwow)
9.
Effects of the replacement of concentrate and fibre-rich hay by high-quality hay on chewing, rumination and nutrient digestibility in non-lactating Holstein cows, Archives of Animal Nutrition, 2017, 71, 1, 21  crossref(new windwow)
10.
Effect of sugarcane fiber digestibility, conservation method and concentrate level on the ruminal ecosystem of beef cattle, AMB Express, 2017, 7, 1  crossref(new windwow)
11.
Effects of Physically Effective Fiber on Digestive Processes and Milk Fat Content in Early Lactating Dairy Cows Fed Total Mixed Rations, Journal of Dairy Science, 2006, 89, 2, 651  crossref(new windwow)
12.
Maize silage particle length modulates feeding patterns and milk composition in loose-housed lactating Holstein cows, Livestock Science, 2009, 124, 1-3, 33  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Allen, M. S. 1997. Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1447-1462.

2.
Bwire, J. M. N. and H. Wiktorsson. 2003. Effect of supplementary feeding strategies on the performance of stall fed dual-purpose dairy cows fed grass hay-based diets. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(3):359-367.

3.
Beauchemin, K. A. 1991. Ingestion and mastication of feed by dairy cattle. Vet. Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, 7(2):439-463.

4.
Choi, Y. J., S. S. Lee, J. Y. Song, N. J. Choi, H. G. Sung, S. G. Yun and J. K. Ha. 2003. Effects of dietary acidogenicity values on rumen fermentation characteristics and nutrients digestibility. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(11):1625-1633.

5.
Fisher, D. S., J. C. Burns and K. R. Pond. 1988. Estimation of mean and median particle size of ruminant digesta. J. Dairy Sci. 71:518-524.

6.
Gabel, G. 2000. S$\"{a}$ure-Basen-Haushalt. In Physiologie der Haustiere. (Ed. W. V. Engelhardt and G. Breves), Enke im Hippokrates Verlag GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 295-302.

7.
Hoover, W. H. 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. J. Dairy Sci. 69:2755-2767.

8.
Kaufmann, W. and H. Hagemeister. 1969. Das Puffersystem in den Vorm$\"{a}$gen von Rindern. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 25:157-168.

9.
Kennedy, P. M. and P. T. Doyle. 1993. Particle-size reduction by ruminants – Effects of cell wall composition and structure. In Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. (Ed. H. G. Jung, D. R. Buxton, R. D. Hatfield and J. Ralph), Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 499-534.

10.
Khazaal, K., M. T. Dentinho, J. M. Ribeiro and E. R. Orskov. 1993. A comparison of gas production during incubation with rumen contents in vitro and nylon bag degradability as predictors of the apparent digestibility in vivo and the voluntary intake of hays. Anim. Prod. 57:105-112.

11.
Krause, D. O. and A. N. Pell. 2003. Plant cell wall degradation in the rumen: ecology, constraints to digestion and modelling. In Matching herbivore nutrition to ecosystems biodiversity. Mannetje, L.’t, L. Ramirez-Aviles, (Ed. C. A. Sandoval-Castro and J. C. Ku-Vera). Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan, Mexico, pp. 129-150.

12.
Krause, K. M., D. K. Combs and K. A. Beauchemin. 2002. Effects of forage particle size and grain fermentability in midlactation cows. II. Ruminal pH and chewing activity. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1947-1957.

13.
Lechner-Doll, M. and W. von Engelhardt. 1989. Particle size and passage from the forestomach in camels compared to cattle and sheep fed similar diet. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 61:120-128.

14.
Littell, R. C., P. R. Henry and C. B. Ammerman. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1216-1231.

15.
Mambrini, M. and J. L. Peyraud. 1997. Retention time of feed particles and liquids in the stomachs and intestines of dairy cows; direct measurement and calculations based on faecal collection. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 37:427-442.

16.
McLeod, M. N. and D. J. Minson. 1988. Large particle breakdown by cattle eating ryegrass and alfalfa. J. Anim. Sci. 66:992-999.

17.
Mertens, D. R. 1997. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1463-1481.

18.
Moon, Y. H., S. C. Lee and S. S. Lee. 2004. Effects of neutral detergent fiber concentration and particle size of the diet on chewing activities of dairy cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(11):1535-1540.

19.
Moore, J. A., K. R. Pond, M. N. Poore and T. G. Goodwin. 1992. Influence of model and marker on digesta kinetic estimates for sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3528-3540.

20.
Mould, F. L., E. R. Orskov and S. O. Mann. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion on various roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 10:15-30.

21.
Offer, N. W. and J. Dixon. 2000. Factors affecting outflow rate from the reticulo-rumen. Nutr. Abstr. Rev., Series B: Livestock Feeds and Feeding, 70:833-844.

22.
Okine, E. K., G. W. Mathison, M. Kaske, J. J. Kenelly and R. J. Christopherson. 1998. Current understanding of the role of the reticulum and reticulo-omasal orifice in the control of digesta passage from the ruminoreticulum of sheep and cattle. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 78:15-21.

23.
Poppi, D. P., W. C. Ellis, J. H. Matis and C. E. Lascano. 2001. Marker concentration patterns of labelled leaf and stem particles in the rumne of cattle grazing bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon) analysed by reference to a raft model. Br. J. Nutr. 85:353-563.

24.
Robinson, P. H. and R. E. McQueen. 1997. Influence of level of concentrate allocation and fermentability of forage fiber on chewing behaviour and production of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 80:681-691.

25.
SAS. 2001. SAS/STAT, Release 8.2. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.

26.
Susenbeth, A., T. Dickel, K. -H. Sudekum, W. Drochner and H. Steingass. 2004. Energy requirements of cattle for standing and for ingestion, estimated by a ruminal emptying technique. J. Anim. Sci. 82:129-136.

27.
Tafaj, M., B. Junck, A. Maulbetsch, H. SteingaB and W. Drochner. 2001. Research Note: A method for studying of local differences in ruminal fermentation in dairy cattle. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 54:341-347.

28.
Tamminga, S. 1993. Influence of feeding management on ruminant fibre digestibility. In Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. (Ed. H. G. Jung, D. R. Buxton, R. D. Hatfield and J. Ralph), Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp. 571-602.

29.
Uden, P., P. E. Colucci and P. J. Van Soest. 1980. Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta rate of passage studies. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31:625-632.

30.
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Second edition. Cornell University Press.

31.
Welch, J. G. 1982. Rumination, particle size and passage from the rumen. J. Anim. Sci. 54:885-894.