JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Genetic Variability and Relationships of Japanese and Foreign Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Profiling
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Genetic Variability and Relationships of Japanese and Foreign Chickens Assessed by Microsatellite DNA Profiling
Osman, S.A.M.; Sekino, M.; Nishihata, A.; Kobayashi, Y.; Takenaka, W.; Kinoshita, K.; Kuwayama, T.; Nishibori, M.; Yamamoto, Y.; Tsudzuki, M.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This is the first study in which genetic variability and relationships of a large number of Japanese chicken breeds were revealed along with those of several foreign breeds by using microsatellite DNA polymorphisms. Twenty-eight breeds (34 populations) of native Japanese chickens and seven foreign breeds or varieties were analyzed. The mean number of alleles per locus, the proportion of the polymorphic loci, and the expected average heterozygosity ranged from 1.75 to 4.70, from 0.55 to 1.00, and from 0.21 to 0.67, respectively. Microsatellite alleles being unique to a particular population were detected in some populations. The genetic distance between populations was obtained from allele frequency for every pair of the populations to construct a neighbor-joining tree. According to the phylogenetic tree, excluding a few exceptions, native Japanese chicken breeds and foreign breeds were clearly separated from each other. Furthermore, the tree topology divided native Japanese chickens into four main classes, which was almost in accordance with the classification based on body morphology; that is, (1) Cochin type, (2) Malay type, (3) layer type, and (4) intermediate type between Malay and layer types. This is the first finding for native Japanese chickens.
 Keywords
Genetic Relationship;Genetic Variability;Native Japanese Chickens;Microsatellite;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Buchanan, F. C., L. J. Adams, R. P. Littlejohn, J. F. Maddox and A. M. Crawford. 1994. Determination of evolutionary relationships among sheep breeds using microsatellites. Genom. 22:397-403 crossref(new window)

2.
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. and A. W. F. Edwards. 1967. Phylogenetic analysis: Models and estimation procedures. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 19:233-257

3.
Cheng, H. H., I. Levin, R. L. Vallejo, H. Khatib, J. B. Dodgson, L. B. Crittenden and J. Hillel. 1995. Development of a genetic map of the chicken with markers of high utility. Poult. Sci. 74:1855-1874

4.
Cheng, G. H., X. S. Wu, D. Q. Wang, J. Qin, S. L. Wu, Q. L. Zhou, F. Xie, R. Cheng, Q. Xu, B. Liu, X. Y. Zhang and O. Olowofeso. 2004. Cluster analysis of 12 Chinese native chicken populations using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1047-1052

5.
Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. B. F. Groen, A. J. A. van Kampen, Van der S. Beek, J. J. van Der Poel and M. A. M. Groenen. 1996. Microsatellite polymorphism in commercial broiler and layer lines estimated using pooled blood samples. Poult. Sci. 75:904-909

6.
Crooijmans, R. P. M. A., A. J. A. van Kampen, J. J. van der Poel and M. A. M Groenen. 1993. Highly polymorphic microsatellite markers in poultry. Anim. Genet. 24:441-443

7.
Dorji, T., O. Hanotte, M. Arbenz, J. E. O. Rege and W. Roder. 2003. Genetic diversity of indigenous cattle populations in Bhutan: Implications for conservation. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16:946-951

8.
Emara, M. G., H. Kim, J. J. Zhu, R. R. Lapierre, N. Lakshmanan and H. S. Lillehoj. 2002. Genetic diversity at the major histocompatibility complex (B) and microsatellite loci in three commercial broiler pure lines. Poult. Sci. 81:1609-1617

9.
Goldstein, D. B. and D. D. Pollock. 1997. Launching microsatellites: A review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Hered. 88:335-342

10.
Goldstein, D. B., L. A. Ruiz, L. L. Cavalli-Sforza and M. W. Feldman. 1995. Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:6723-6727

11.
Groenen, M. A. M., H. H. Cheng, N. Bumstead, B. F. Benkel, W. E. Briles, T. Burke, D. W. Burt, L. B. Crittenden, J. Dodgson, J. Hillel, S. Lamont, A. P. de Leon, M. Soller, H. Takahashi and A. Vignal. 2000. A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome. Genome Res. 10:137-147

12.
Hashiguchi, T., M. Tsuneyoshi, T. Nishida, H. Higashiuwatoko and E. Hiraoka. 1981. Phylogenetic relationships determined by the blood protein types of fowls (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 52:713-729

13.
Hillel, J., M. A. Groenen, M. Tixier-Boichard, A. B. Korol, L. David, V. M. Kirzhner, T. Burke, A. Barre-Dirie, R. P. Crooijmans, K. Elo, M. W. Feldman, P. J. Freidlin, A. Maki- Tanila, M. Oortwijn, P. Thomson, A. Vignal, K. Wimmers and S. Weigend. 2003. Biodiversity of 52 chicken populations assessed by microsatellite typing of DNA pools. Genet. Sel. Evol. 35:533-557

14.
Japan Chicken Association. 2003. The guidebook of special meattype chickens (in Japanese). Zenkoku-Shokuchou-Shinbun Co. Ltd., Tokyo

15.
Kuroda, N. and T. Yamaguchi. 1987. Japanese Chickens as Natural Monuments (in Japanese). Kyoikusha, Tokyo

16.
Lewontin, R. C. and J. L. Hubby. 1966. A molecular approach to the study of genetic heterozygosity in natural populations of Drosophila pseduobscura. Genet. 54:595-609

17.
MacHugh, D. E., R. T. Loftus, D. G. Barley, P. M. Sharp and P. Cunningham. 1994. Microsatellite DNA variation within and among European cattle breeds. Proc. Royal Soc. Lond. Series B. 256:25-31

18.
Martinez, A. M., J. V. Delgado, A. Rodero and J. L. Vega-pla. 2000. Genetic structure of the Iberian pig breed using microsatellite. Anim. Genet. 31:295-301 crossref(new window)

19.
Milligan, B. G., J. Leebens-Mack and A. E. Strand. 1994. Conservation genetics: Beyond the maintenance of marker diversity. Mol. Ecol. 3:423-435 crossref(new window)

20.
Mitsui, T. 1979. General View of Japanese Native Chickens (in Japanese). Petlife-Sha, Tokyo

21.
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genet. 89:583- 590

22.
Nei, M., F. Tajima and Y. Tateno. 1983. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data: 2. Gene frequency data. J. Mol. Evol. 19:153-170 crossref(new window)

23.
Nishida, T., Y. Hayashi, T. Fujioka, I. Tsugiyama and K. Mochizuki. 1985a. Osteometric studies on the phylogenetic relationships of Japanese native fowls. Jpn. J. Vet. Sci. 47:25- 37

24.
Nishida, T., Y. Hayashi and T. Hashiguchi. 1985b. Somatometrical studies on the morphological relationships of Japanese native fowls. Jpn. J. Zootech. Sci. 56:645-657

25.
Oana, H. 1951. The Histories of Japanese Native Chickens (in Japanese). Nihonkei-Kenkyusha, Tokyo

26.
Okabayashi, H., S. Kamiya and Y. Tanabe. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships among Japanese native chicken breeds based on blood protein polymorphism (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 35:173-181

27.
Okada, I. 1991. The native chicken of Japan. In Catalogue of the Native Poultry of Southeast Asia. (Ed. J. Bay-Petersen). Taiwan Livestock Research Institute, Tainan, pp. 3-35

28.
Okada, I., K. Toyokawa and I. Takayasu. 1980. Genetic relationships of some native chicken breeds in the northern Tohoku district of Japan (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 17:337-343

29.
Okada, I., Y. Yamamoto, T. Hashiguchi and S. Ito. 1984. Phylogenetic studies on the Japanese native breeds of chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 21:318-329

30.
Okada, I., Y. Yamamoto, A. Shinjo, S. Kimura and H. Hiraoka. 1989. Studies of genetic differentiation within breeds of Japanese indigenous chickens. Jpn. Poult. Sci. 26:207-215

31.
Osman, A.-M. S., M. Sekino, M. Nishibori, Y. Kawamoto, K. Kinoshita, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2004. Genetic variability and relationships of Japanese native chickens assessed by means of microsatellite profiling approach - Focusing on the Oh-Shamo (Japanese Large Game) and its related breeds. J. Poult. Sci. 41:94-109 crossref(new window)

32.
Osman, S. A. M., M. Sekino, M. Nishibori, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2005. Genetic variability and relationships of native Japanese chickens assessed by microsatellite DNA profiling- Focusing on the breeds established in Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:755-761

33.
Osman, S. A. M., M. Sekino, T. Kuwayama, K. Kinoshita, M. Nishibori, Y. Yamamoto and M. Tsudzuki. 2006. Genetic variability and relationships of native Japanese chickens based on microsatellite DNA polymorphisms -Focusing on the Natural Monuments of Japan. J. Poult. Sci. 43:12-22 crossref(new window)

34.
Ota, T. 2001. DISPAN: Genetic distance and phylogenetic analysis (last modified May 19, 2001) http://www.bio.psu.edu/people/ faculty/nei/lab/programs.html

35.
Page, R. D. M. 2001. TREEVIEW (last modified Sept 3, 2001) http://taxonomy.zoology.gla.ac.uk/rod

36.
Pandey, A. K., M. S. Tantia, D. Kumar, B. Misra, P. Choudhary and R. K. Vijh. 2002. Microsatellite analysis of three poultry breeds of India. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1536-1542

37.
Park, S. D. E. 2005. The Excel Microsatellite Toolkit (last modified May 5, 2005). http://oscar.gen.tcd.ie/~sdepark/mstoolkit/

38.
Paszek, A. A., G. H. Flickinger, L. Fontanesi, C. W. Beattie, G. A. Rohrer, A. L. Alexander and L. B. Schook. 1998. Evolutionary divergence with microsatellites. J. Mol. Evol. 46:121-126 crossref(new window)

39.
Petit, E., S. Aulagnier, D. Vaiman, C. Bouissou and B. Crouauroy. 1997. Microsatellite variation in a introduced mouflon population. J. Hered. 88:517-520

40.
Ponsuksili, S., K. Wimmers and P. Horst. 1996. Genetic variability in chickens using polymorphic microsatellite markers. Thai J. Agr. Sci. 29:571-580

41.
Roberts, V. 1997. British Pultry Standards. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford

42.
Saitou, N. and M. Nei. 1987. The neighbor-joining method: A new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4:406-425

43.
Sawada, Y. 1978. My grandfather, I, and Miyadi-dori (in Japanese). Nippon-no-Aigankei 55:8-9

44.
Schmid, M., I. Nanda, M. Guttenbach, C. Steinlein, M. Hoehn, M. Schartl, T. Haaf, S. Weigend, R. Fries, J. M. Buerstedde, K. Wimmers, D. W. Burt, J. Smith, S. A'Hara, A. Law, D. K. Griffin, N. Bumstead, J. Kaufman, P. A. Thomson, T. Burke, M. A. Groenen, R. P. Crooijmans, A. Vignal, V. Fillon, M. Morisson, F. Pitel, M. Tixier-Boichard, K. Ladjali-Mohammedi, J. Hillel, A. Maki-Tanila, H. H. Cheng, M. E. Delany, J. Burnside and S. Mizuno. 2000. First report on chicken genes and chromosomes 2000. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 90:169-218 crossref(new window)

45.
Shriver, M. D., L. Jin, E. Boerwinkle, R. Deka and R. E. Ferrell. 1995. A novel measure of genetic distance for highly polymorphic tandem repeat loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 12:914-920

46.
Takezaki, N. and M. Nei. 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genet. 144:389-399

47.
Tanabe, Y. and M. Mizutani. 1980. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds: 3. Genetic distances among the 16 breeds based on 16 loci, and their dendrogram (in Japanese with English sumarry). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 17:116-121

48.
Tanabe, Y., T. Iida, H. Yoshino, A. Shinjo and S. Muramatsu. 1991. Studies on the phylogenetic relationships of the Japanese native fowl breeds: 5. The comparisons among native fowl breeds in Japan and its adjacent areas and European and American fowl breeds (in Japanese with English summary). Jpn. Poult. Sci. 28:266-277

49.
Tautz, D. 1989. Hypervariability of simple sequences as a general source for polymorphic DNA markers. Nucleic Acids Res. 17:6463-6471 crossref(new window)

50.
Tsudzuki, M. 2003. Japanese native chickens. In The Relationship between Indigenous Animals and Humans in APEC Region. (Ed. H. L. Chang and Y. C. Huang). The Chinese Society of Animal Science, Taiwan, Tainan. pp. 91-116

51.
Vanhala, T., M. Tuiskula-Haavisto, K. Elo, J. Vilkki and A. A. Mäki-Tanil. 1998. Evaluation of genetic variability and genetic distances between eight chicken lines using microsatellite markers. Poult. Sci. 77:783-790

52.
van Marle-Koster, E. and L. H. Nel. 2000. Genetic characterization of native southern African chicken populations: Evaluation and selection of polymorphic microsatellite markers. South Afrc. J. Anim. Sci. 30:1-6