JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Genetic Parameter Estimation of Carcass Traits of Duroc Predicted Using Ultrasound Scanning Modes
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Genetic Parameter Estimation of Carcass Traits of Duroc Predicted Using Ultrasound Scanning Modes
Salces, Agapita J.; Seo, Kang Seok; Cho, Kyu Ho; Kim, SiDong; Lee, Young Chang;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A total of 6,804 records for Duroc breed were collected from three farms registered at the Korean Animal Improvement Association (KAIA) from 1998 to 2004 of which both records from two ultrasound modes (A and B) were analyzed to estimate the variance components of carcass traits. Three carcass traits backfat thickness (bf), loin eye muscle area (lma) and lean meat percentage (lmp) were measured. These traits were analyzed separately as bf1, lma1 and lmp1 for ultrasound mode A and bf2, lma2 and lmp2 for ultrasound mode B with multiple trait animal model by using MTDFREML (Boldman et al., 1993). All the traits revealed medium heritability values. Estimated heritabilities for bf1, bf2, lma1, lma2, lmp1 and lmp2 were 0.45, 0.39, 0.32, 0.25, 0.28 and 0.39, respectively. Estimated genetic correlations for traits bf1 and bf2, lma1 and lma2, lmp1 and lmp2 were positive but low. Specifically, genetic correlations between bf1 and bf2 was 0.30 while the estimates for lean traits between lma1 and lma2 and between lmp1 and lmp2 were 0.15 and 0.18, respectively. Conversely, high negative genetic correlations existed between bf1 and the lean traits lma2, lmp2. Likewise, the estimated genetic correlations between lma1 and lma2 and lmp1 and lmp2 were low.
 Keywords
Duroc;Genetic Parameters;Carcass Traits;Ultrasound Mode;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Arganosa, V. G., I. T. Omtveld and L. E. Walters. 1969. Phenotypic and genotypic parameters of some carcass traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 28:166

2.
Bereskin, B. 1987. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for pig growth and body composition estimated by intraclass correlation and parent-offspring regression. J. Anim. Sci. 64:1619

3.
Bereskin, B. and N. C. Steele. 1988. Estimates of genetic parameters for carcass measures of body composition and growth in swine. J. Anim. Sci. 66:2498

4.
Boldman, K. G., L. A. Kriese, L. D. Vleck and S. D. Kachman. 1993. A Manual for use of MTDFREML. A set of program to obtain estimates of variances and covariances [Draft]. U.S. Department of Agricultural Research Service

5.
Bryner, S. M., J. W. Marby, J. K. Bertrand, L. L. Benyshek and L. A. Kriese. 1992. Estimation of direct and maternal heritability and genetic correlation for backfat and growth rate in swine using data from centrally tested Yorkshire boars. J. Anim. Sci. 70:1755-1759

6.
Chen, P., T. J. Baas, J. W. Marby, J. C. M. Dekkers and K. J. Koehler. 2002. Genetic parameters and trends for lean growth rate and its components in U.S. Yorkshire, Duroc, Hamshire and Landrace pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2062-2070

7.
Choi, C. S., I. J. Lee, K. H. Cho, K. S. Seo and J. Lee. 2004. Estimation of genetic parameters for economic traits in swine. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor) 46(2)

8.
Ferraz, J. B. S. and R. K. Johnson. 1993. Animal model estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for litter size and weight, growth and backfat in closed seedstock populations of Large White and Landrace swine. J. Anim. Sci. 71:850-858

9.
Hicks, C., M. Satoh, K. Ishii and S. Kuroki. 1999. Effect of sex on estimates of genetic parameters for daily gain and ultrasonic backfat thickness in swine. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12:677- 681

10.
Hutchens, L.K., R. L. Hintz and R. K. Johnson. 1981. Genetic and phenotypic relationships between pubertal and growth characteristics of gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 53:946-951

11.
Kaplon, M. J., M. F. Rothschild, P. J. Berger and M. Healey. 1991. Population parameter estimates for performance and reproductive traits in Polish Large White nucleus herds. J. Anim. Sci. 69:91

12.
Kennedy, B. W., K. Johansson and G. F. S. Hudon. 1985. Heritabilities and genetic correlations for backfat and age at 90 kg in performance-tested pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 61:78-82

13.
Kim, J. I., Y. G. Sohn, J. H. Jung and Y. I. Park. 2004. Genetic parameter estimates for backfat thickness at three different sites and growth rate in swine. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:305-308

14.
Kuhlers, D. L. and S. B. Jungst. 1992. Correlated responses in reproductive and carcass traits to selection for 200-day weight is Duroc swine. J. Anim. Sci. 70:2707-2713

15.
Li, X. and B. W. Kennedy. 1994. Genetic parameters for growth rate and backfat in Canadian Yorkshire, Landrace, Duroc and Hampshire pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1450

16.
Lo, L. L., D. G. McLaren, F. K. McKeith, R. L. Fernando and J. Novakofski. 1992. Genetic analyses of growth, real-time ultrasound, carcass, and pork quality traits in Duroc and Landrace pigs: II. Heritabilities and correlations. J. Anim. Sci. 70:2387-2396

17.
Lundstorm, K. 1975. Genetic Parameters estimated on data from the Swedish pig progeny testing with special emphasis on meat color. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 5:209

18.
Moeller, S. J. and L. L. Christian. 1998. Evaluation of accuracy of real-time ultrasonic measurements of backfat and loin muscle area in swine using multiple statistical analysis procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2503-2514

19.
Moeller, S. J. 2002. Evolution and use of ultrasonic technology in the swine industry. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (E. Suppl.2) E19-27

20.
Mrode, R. A. and B. W. Kennedy. 1993. Genetic variation in measures of food efficiency in pigs and their genetic relationships with growth and backfat. Anim. Prod. 56:225-232

21.
Newcom, D. W., T. J. Baas, J. W. Marby and R. N. Goodwin. 2002. Genetic parameters for pork carcass components. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3099-3106

22.
NSIF. 1987. Guidelines for Uniform Swine Improvement Programs. (Ed. C. J. Christians) National Swine Improvement Federation/Sci. Education Admin./USDA/National Pork Producers Council, Des Moines, IA

23.
SAS. 1991. SAS User's Guide Statistical Analysis System Institute, Cary NC

24.
Sather, A. P., A. K. W. Tong and D. S. Harbison. 1986. A study of ultrasonic probing techniques for swine. I. The effect of operator machine site. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 66:591-598

25.
Sloan, A. E., L. C. Leone, M. Powers and K. W. McNutt. 1984. Changing consumer lifestyles. Food Technol. 38:99

26.
Stewart, T. S. and A .P. Schinckel. 1990. Genetic parameters for swine growth and carcass traits. In Genetics of Swine. (Ed. L. D. Young). North central Reg. Pub. USDA, Clay Center, NE

27.
Swiger, L. A., G. A. Isler and W. A. Harvey. 1979. Postweaning genetic parameters and indexes for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 48:1096-1100

28.
Van Diepen, T. A. and B. W. Kennedy. 1989. Genetic correlations between test station and on-farm performance for growth rate and backfat in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 67:1425

29.
Wilson, D. E. 1992. Application of ultrasound for genetic improvement. J. Anim. Sci. 70:973-983