JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Correlations between Heterozygosity at Microsatellite Loci, Mean d2 and Body Weight in a Chinese Native Chicken
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Correlations between Heterozygosity at Microsatellite Loci, Mean d2 and Body Weight in a Chinese Native Chicken
Liu, G.Q.; Jiang, X.P.; Wang, J.Y.; Wang, Z.Y.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A total of two hundred twenty eight half-sib chickens were scored for allele size at 20 microsatellite loci to estimate individual heterozygosity and mean . The averages of microsatellite heterozygosity, allele per locus and mean were 0.39, 3.6 and 49, respectively. The body weight was measured biweekly from birth to twelve weeks of age. Gompertz function was assumed to simulate body weight and to estimate the growth model parameters. Due to sex effect on body weight, the regression of body weight on heterozygosity as well as on mean in males and females was analyzed separately in the present study. Positive correlations were found between microsatellite heterozygosity and body weight in males and females (p<0.05). Positive correlation also observed between individual heterozygosity and simulated maximum daily gain estimated from Gompertz function in female chickens (p<0.05). There were no significant correlations between mean and body weight. The results suggest that local effect hypothesis could explain the correlations between heterozygosity and fitness-related traits in the domesticated chicken population, rather than the general effect hypothesis does.
 Keywords
Microsatellite Heterozygosity;Mean ;Body Weight;Chicken;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Genetic Diversity of Wild Quail in China Ascertained with Microsatellite DNA Markers,;;;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2007. vol.20. 12, pp.1783-1790 crossref(new window)
2.
Isolation and Characterization of Microsatellite Markers in Tsaiya Duck,;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 5, pp.624-627 crossref(new window)
3.
Study on Genetic Diversity of Six Duck Populations with Microsatellite DNA,;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 6, pp.776-783 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Balloux, F., W. Amos and T. Coulson. 2004. Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations? Mol. Ecol. 13:3021- 3031 crossref(new window)

2.
Bierne, N., S. Launey, Y. Naciri-Graven and F. Bonhomme. 1998. Early effect of inbreeding as revealed by microsatellite analyses on Ostrea edulis larvae. Genet. 148:1893-1906

3.
Borrell, Y. J., H. Pineda, I. McCarthy, E. Vazquez, J. A. Sanchez and G. B. Lizana. 2004. Correlations between fitness and heterozygosity at allozyme and microsatellite loci in the Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Heredity 92:585-593 crossref(new window)

4.
Coltman, D. W., W. D. Bowen and J. M. Wright. 1998. Birth weight and neonatal survival of harbour seal pups are positively correlated with genetic variation measured by microsatellites. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:803-809

5.
Coltman, D. W. and J. Slate. 2003. Microsatellite measures of inbreeding: A meta-analysis. Evolution 57:971-983

6.
Coulson, T. N., J. M. Pemberton, S. D. Albon, M. Beaumont, T. C. Marshall, J. Slate, F. E. Guinness and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 1998. Microsatellites reveal heterosis in red deer. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:489-495

7.
Curik, I., P. Zechner, J. Solkner, R. Achmann, I. Bodo, P. Dovc, T. Kavar, E. Marti and G. Brem. 2003. Inbreeding, microsatellite heterozygosity, and morphological traits in Lipizzan horses. J. Hered. 94:125-132 crossref(new window)

8.
David, P. 1998. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations: new perspectives on old problems. Heredity 80:531-537 crossref(new window)

9.
David, P., B. Deley, P. Berthou and P.Jarne. 1995. Alternative models for allozyme-associated heterosis in the marine bivalve Spisula ovalis. Genet. 139:1719-1726

10.
Hansson, B. and L. Westerberg. 2002. On the correlation between heterozygosity and fitness in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 11:2467-2474 crossref(new window)

11.
Houle, D. 1989. Allozyme-associated heterosis in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet. 123:789-801

12.
Hughes, C. R. and D. C. Queller. 1993. Detection of highly polymorphic microsatellite loci in a species with little allozyme polymorphism. Mol. Ecol. 2:131-137 crossref(new window)

13.
Jarne, P. and P. J. L. Lagoda. 1996. Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:424- 429 crossref(new window)

14.
Jiang, X. P., G. Q. Liu and Y. Z. Xiong. 2005. Investigation of Gene and Microsatellite Heterozygosities Correlated to Growth Rate in the Chinese Meishan Pig. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:927-932

15.
Jiang, X. P., Y. Z. Xiong, G. Q. Liu, C. Y. Deng and Y. C. Qu. 2003. Effects of individual gene heterozygosity on growth traits in swine. Acta Genetica Sinica 30:431-436

16.
Leary, R. F. 1987. Differences in inbreeding coefficients do not explain the associations between heterozygosity at allozyme loci and developmental stability in rainbow trout. Evolution 41:1413-415 crossref(new window)

17.
Markert, J. A., P. R. Grant, B. R. Grant, L. F. Keller, J. L. Coombs and K. Petren. 2004. Neutral locus heterozygosity, inbreeding, and survival in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza fortis and G. scandens). Heredity 92:306-315 crossref(new window)

18.
Pogson, G. H. and S. E. Fevolden. 1998. DNA heterozygosity and growth rate in the Atlantic cod Gadus morhua. Evolution 52:915-920 crossref(new window)

19.
Pogson, G. H. and E. Zouros. 1994. Allozyme and RFLP heterozygosities as correlates of growth rate in the Scallop Placopecten magellanicus: a test of the associative overdominance hypothesis. Genet. 137:221-231

20.
Pujolar, J. M., G. E. Maes, C. Vancoillie and F. A. M. Volckaert. 2005. Growth rate correlates to individual heterozygosity in the European eel, Anguilla Anguilla L. Evolution 59:189-199

21.
Rowe, G. and T. J. C. Beebee. 2001. Fitness and microsatellite diversity estimates were not correlated in two outbreed anuran populations. Heredity 87:558-565 crossref(new window)

22.
Shikano, T. and N. Taniguchi. 2002. Relationships between genetic variation measured by microsatellite DNA markers and a fitness-related trait in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Aquac. 209:77-90 crossref(new window)

23.
Slate, J., P. David, K. G. Dodds, B. A. Veenvliet, B. C. Glass, T. E. Broad and J. C. McEwan. 2004. Understanding the relationship between the inbreeding coefficient and multilocus heterozygosity: theoretical expectations and empirical data. Heredity 93:255-265 crossref(new window)

24.
Smouse, P. E. 1986. The fitness consequences of multiple-locus heterozygosity under the multiplicative overdominance and inbreeding models. Evolution 40:946-957 crossref(new window)

25.
Thelen, G. C. and F. W. Allendorf. 2001. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in rainbow trout: effects of allozyme loci or associative overdominance? Evolution 55:1180-1187

26.
Tu, Y. J., K. W. Chen, S. J. Zhang, Q. P. Tang, Y. S. Gao and N. Yang. 2006. Genetic diversity of 14 indigenous grey goose breeds in China based on microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:1-8

27.
Tsitrone, A., F. Rousset and P. David. 2001. Heterosis, marker mutational processes and population inbreeding history. Genet. 159:1845-1859

28.
Wang, X., H. H. Cao, S. M. Geng and H. B. Li. 2004. Genetic diversity of 10 indigenous pig breeds in China by using microsatellite markers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1219- 1226

29.
Zhang, J. H., Y. Z. Xiong and C. Y. Deng. 2005. Correlations of genic heterozygosity and variances with heterosis in a pig population revealed by microsatellite DNA marker. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:620-625

30.
Zouros, E. 1993. Associative overdominance: evaluating the effects of inbreeding and linkage disequilibrium. Genetica 89:35-46 crossref(new window)