JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Dietary Enterococcus faecium SF68 on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Characteristics and Faecal Noxious Gas Content in Finishing Pigs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Dietary Enterococcus faecium SF68 on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Characteristics and Faecal Noxious Gas Content in Finishing Pigs
Chen, Y.J.; Min, B.J.; Cho, J.H.; Kwon, O.S.; Son, K.S.; Kim, I.H.; Kim, S.J.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of feeding probiotic (Enterococcus faecium SF68, EF) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics and faecal noxious gas content in finishing pigs. A total of eighty [()] pigs with an initial BW of were used in this 8-week experiment. Pigs were allotted to four treatments (4 replicates per treatment and 5 pigs per pen) according to a randomized complete block design. Dietary treatments were: 1) CON (control; basal diet), 2) CTC (control diet+0.1% antibiotic, chlortetracycline), 3) EF1 (control diet+0.1% probiotic, EF) and 4) EF2 (control diet+0.2% probiotic, EF). During weeks 0-4, ADG was not affected by the addition of antibiotic or EF (p>0.05). In weeks 4-8, ADG tended to increase in CTC and EF treatments compared to CON treatment (p<0.10). ADFI and gain/feed were not affected in each 4-week period and the entire experimental period (p>0.05). Digestibilities of DM and N were higher in EF supplemented treatments than in CON and CTC treatments (p<0.05). Blood characteristics of WBC, RBC and lymphocyte were not affected in pigs given diets containing EF (p>0.05). Supplementation of EF in the diet decreased faecal ammonia nitrogen (-N) and hydrogen sulphide () concentrations (p<0.05). Faecal acetic acid concentration tended to decrease (p<0.10) while propionic acid and butyric acid concentrations were significantly lower on diets with EF supplementation than on the diet containing antibiotic (p<0.05). In conclusion, dietary supplementation of EF can increase nutrient digestibility and decrease faecal -N, and volatile fatty acid (VFA) concentrations in finishing pigs.
 Keywords
Enterococcus faecium SF68;Digestibility;Blood Characteristics;Faecal Noxious Gas;Pigs;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alander, M., R. Satokari, R. Korpela, M. Saxelin, S. T. Vilpponen, S. T. Mattila and W. A. Von. 1999. Persistence of colonization of human colonic mucosa by a probiotic strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG after consumption. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:351-354

2.
AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC

3.
Apgar, G. A., E. T. Kornegay, M. D. Lindemann and C. M. Wood. 1993. The effect of feeding various levels of bifidobacterium globosum A on the performance, gastrointestinal measurements and immunity of weanling pigs and on the performance and carcass measurements of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2173-2179

4.
Barrow, P. A. 1992. Probiotics in chickens. In: Probiotics-The scientific basis (Ed. R. Fuller). Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 25-257

5.
Broom, L. J., H. M. Miller, K. G. Kerr and J. S. Knapp. 2005. Effects of zinc oxide and Enterococcus faecium SF68 dietary supplementation on the performance, intestinal microbiota and immune status of weaned piglets. Research in Vet. Sci. In press

6.
Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified regents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8:131

7.
Chen, Y. J., K. S. Son, B. J. Min, J. H. Cho, O. S. Kwon and I. H. Kim. 2005. Effects of dietary complex probiotic on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1464-1468

8.
Cho, K. H., U. T. Lee, C. K. Yang, I. W. Yu, Y. S. Kim and Y. D. Yoon. 1992. The effect of Lactobacillus casei (TSC-66) for growth promotion in piglets. Kor. J. Vet. Pub Health. 16:49-53

9.
Freter, R. 1992. Factors affecting the microecology of the gut. In: Probiotics-The scientific Basis. (Ed. R. Fuller). Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 111-114

10.
Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals - A Review. J. Appl. 66:365-378

11.
Fuller, R. 1992. The effect of probiotics on the gut microbiology of farm animals. In The Lactic Acid Bacteria. (Ed. BJB. Wood ) Elsevier Applied Science, London. pp. 171-192

12.
Havenaar, R. and J. H. J. Huis In't Veld. 1992. Probiotics: a general view. In: The Lactic Acid Bacteria. Vol. 1: the Lactic Acid Bacteria in Health and Disease (Ed. B. J. B. Wood). Elsevier Applied Science London. pp. 151-170

13.
Herich, R. and M. Levkut. 2002. Lactic acid bacteria, probiotics and immune system (Review). Vet. Med-Czech. 47:169-180

14.
Hong, J. W., I. H. Kim, O. S. Kwon, J. H. Kim, B. J. Min and W. B. Lee. 2002. Effects of dietary probiotics supplementation on growth performance and fecal gas emission in nursing and finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor) 44:305-314

15.
Huang, C. H., S. Y. Qiao, D. F. Li, X. S. Piao and J. P. Ren. 2004. Effects of Lactobacilli on the performance, diarrhea incidence, VFA concentration and gastrointestinal microbial flora of weaning pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:401-409

16.
Kil, D. Y., S. J. Lim, J. Z. Tian, B. G. Kim, K. S. Kim and Y. Y. Kim. 2004. Effect of continuous feeding of probiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood urea nitrogen and immune responses in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 46:39-48

17.
Lim, H. S., B. H. Kim and I. K. Paik. 2004. Effects of Natufermen$^{\circledR}$ Supplementation to the diet on the performance of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 46:981-988

18.
Maeng, W. J., C. W. Kin and H. T. Shin. 1989. Effect of feeding lactic acid bacteria concentrate (LBC, Streptococcus faecium Cernelle 68) on growth rate and prevention of scouring in piglet. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 31:318-323

19.
McCormick, J. K., T. R. Klaenhammer and M. E. Stiles. 1999. Colicin V can be produced by lactic acid bacteria. Letters in Appl. Microbiol. 29:37-41 crossref(new window)

20.
NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirement of pigs. 10th Edition. National Research Council, Academy Press. Washington, DC

21.
Otto, E. R., M. Yokoyama, S. Hengemuehle, R. D. von Bermuth, T. van Kempen and N. L. Trottier. 2003. Ammonia, volatile fatty acids, phenolics and odor offensiveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1754-1763

22.
Park, D. Y., H. Namkung and I. K. Paik. 2001. Effects of supplementary enzymes or probiotics on the performance and ammonia gas production in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 43:485-496

23.
Perdigon, G., M. E. N. De Macias, S. Alvarez, G. Oliver and A. P. De Ruiz Holgado. 1986. Effect of perorally administered lactobacilli on macrophage activation in mice. Infect. Immun. 53:404-410

24.
Peterson, R. G. 1985. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Marcel Dekker, New York

25.
Piard, J. C. and M. Desmazeaud. 1991. Inhibiting factors produced by lactic acid bacteria. 1. Oxygen metabolites and catabolism end-products. Lait. 71:525-541 crossref(new window)

26.
Rinkinen, M., K. Jalava, E. Westermarck, S. Salmimen and A. C. Quwehand. 2003. Interaction between probiotic lactic acid bacteria and canine enteric pathogens: a risk factor for intestinal Enterococcus faecium colonization? Vet. Microbiol. 92:111-119 crossref(new window)

27.
SAS. 1996. SAS user's guide. Release 6.12 edition. SAS Institude. Inc Cary NC. USA

28.
Scharek, L., J. Guth, K. Reiter, K. D. Weyrauch, D. Taras, P. Schwerk, P. Schierack, M. F. G. Schmidt, L. H. Wieler and K. Tedin. 2004. Influence of a probiotic Enterococcus faecium strain on development of the immune system of sows and piglets. Veterinary immunology and immunopathology. 105:151-161

29.
Schiffrin, E. J., D. Brassart, A. L. Rochat, F. Rochat and A. Donnet-Hughes. 1997. Immune modulation of blood leukocytes in humans by lactic acid bacteria: criteria for strain selection. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 66:515S

30.
Smoragiewicz, W., M. Bielecka, A. Babuchowski, A. Boutard and H. Dubeau. 1993. Les probiotiqes. Can. J. Microbiol. 39:1089-1095

31.
Tkachev, E. Z. and Q. L. Gvyzin. 1995. Digestive and metabolic functions of the gastrointestinal trace of piglets. Russ. Agric. Sci. 4:8-11

32.
Tortuero, F., J. Rioperez, E. Fernandez and M. L. Rodriguez. 1995. Response of piglets to oral administration of lactic acid bacteria. J. Food Protect. 58:1369-1374

33.
Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Iismaa. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in feces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381 crossref(new window)

34.
Xuan, Z. N., J. D. Kim, K. N. Heo, H. J. Jung, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Han, Y. Y. Kim and I. H. Han. 2001. Study on the development of a probiotics complex for weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1425-1428