Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Ensiling Alfalfa with Whole-crop Maize on the Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Silage Mixtures
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Ensiling Alfalfa with Whole-crop Maize on the Chemical Composition and Nutritive Value of Silage Mixtures
Ozturk, Durmus; Kizilsimsek, Mustafa; Kamalak, Adem; Canbolat, Onder; Ozkan, Cagri Ozgur;
  PDF(new window)
The aim of this study was to evaluate the chemical composition, in vitro DM degradability, ME and OMD of alfalfa-maize silage mixtures in comparison to pure maize and alfalfa silages, and to test the existence of associative effects of ensiling alfalfa forage with whole-crop maize using the in vitro gas production technique. Ensiling alfalfa with whole-crop maize had a significant (p<0.001) effect on chemical composition, pH, in vitro DM degradability, OMD and estimated ME values of mixtures. DM content of the resultant silages significantly increased with increasing proportion of whole-crop maize in the mixtures, whereas the pH value, crude protein (CP), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and ash contents of mixtures decreased due to the dilution effect of whole-crop maize which was low in CP, ADF and ash. The pH values of all alfalfa-maize silage mixtures were at the desired level for quality silage. Gas production of alfalfa-maize silage mixtures at all incubation times except 12 h increased with increasing proportion of whole-crop maize. When alfalfa was mixed with whole-crop maize in the ratio 40:60, ME and OMD values were significantly (p<0.001) higher than other silages. Maximum gas production () ranged from 65.7 to 78.1 with alfalfa silage showing the lowest maximum gas production. The results obtained in this study clearly showed that maximum gas production increased with increased percentage of whole-crop maize in the silage mixtures (r = 0.940, p<0.001). It was concluded that ensiling alfalfa with whole-crop maize improved the pH, OMD and ME values. However, trials with animals are required to see how these differences in silage mixtures affect animal performance.
Alfalfa-maize Silage Mixtures;Organic Matter Digestibility;Gas Production;Metabolizable Energy;
 Cited by
Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value, fermentation and methane characteristics, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 206, 29  crossref(new windwow)
Chemical composition of alfalfa silage with waste date and its feeding effect on ruminal fermentation characteristics and microbial protein synthesis in sheep, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2017, 101, 3, 466  crossref(new windwow)
Associative effects between forages on feed intake and digestion in ruminants, animal, 2009, 3, 07, 951  crossref(new windwow)
Albrecht, K. A. and R. E. Muck. 1991. Proteolysis in ensiled forage that vary in tannin concentration. Crop. Sci. 31:464-469

Anil, L., J. Park and R. H. Phipps. 2000. The potential of foragemaize intercrops in ruminant nutrition. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 86:157-164 crossref(new window)

AOAC. 1990. Official Method of Analysis. 15th. edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC. USA

Bodine, A. B., G. D. O'dell, M. E. Moore and C. K. Wheat. 1983. Effect of dry matter content and length of ensiling on quality of alfalfa silage. J. Dairy Sci. 66:2434-2437

Bolsen, K. K., J. T. Dickerson, B. E. Brent, R. N. Sonon, B. S. Dalke, C. Lin and J. E Boyer. 1993. Rate and extent of top spoilage losses in horizontal silos. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3041-3062

Buxton, D. R. 1996. Quality related characteristics of forages as influenced by plant environment and agronomic factors. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 59:37-49 crossref(new window)

Coblentz, W. K., J. O. Fritz, K. K. Bolsen and R. C. Cochran. 1996. Quality changes in alfalfa during storage in bales. J. Dairy Sci. 79:873-885

Davies, D. R., R. J. Merry, A. P. Willams, E. L Bakewell, D. K Leemans and J. K. S. Tweed. 1998. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content. J. Dairy Sci. 81:444-453

De Boever, J. L., B. G. Cottyn, J. M. De Brabander, J. M Vanacker and Ch. V. Bouchque. 1997. Prediction of the feeding value of maize silages by chemical parameters, in vitro digestibility and NIRS. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 66:211-222 crossref(new window)

Evitayani, L. W., A. Fariani, T. Ichinohe, S. A. Abdulrazak and T. Fujihara. 2004. Comparative rumen degradability of some legume forages between wet and dry season in west Sumatra, Indonesia. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(8):1107-1111

Fonseca, A. J. M., A. R. J. Cabrita, A. M. Lage and E. Gomes. 2000. Evaluation of the chemical composition and the particle size of maize silages produced in north-west of Portugal. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 83:173-183 crossref(new window)

France, J., M. S Dahanoa, M. K Theodorou, S. J. Lister, D. R Davies and D. Isaac. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feed. J. Theoritical. Biol. 163:99-111 crossref(new window)

Getachew, G., M. Blummel, H. P. S Makkar and K. Becker. 1998. In vitro gas measuring techniques for assessment of nutritional quality of feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 72:261-281 crossref(new window)

Ghedalie, B. D. and A. Miron. 2001. Digestion by sheep of monosaccharide constituents of direct cut alfalfa silage made with SO2 treated wheat straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 92(3- 4):175-183 crossref(new window)

Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1975. Forage fiber analyses. (Apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agriculture Handbook No: 379. United States Department of Agriculture. p. 20

Haddad, S. G. and R. J. Grant. 2000. Influence of nonfiber carbohydrate concentration on forage fiber digestion in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 86:107-115 crossref(new window)

Henderson, N. 1993. Silage additives. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol, 45:35-56 crossref(new window)

Kamalak, A., O. Canbolat, Y. Gurbuz, C. O. Ozkan and M. Kizilsimsek. 2005. Determination of nutritive value of wild mustard, Sinapsis arvensis harvested at different maturity stages using in situ and in vitro measurements. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18(9):1249-1254

Kilic, A. 1984. Silo yemi (Silage Feed). Bilgehan Press, Izmir, Turkey, p. 350

McAllister, T. A., R. Fenjuk, Z. Mir, L. B. Selinger and K. J. Cheng. 1998. Inoculants for alfalfa silage: Effects of aeorobic stability, digestibility and the growth performance of feedlot steers. Livestock Prod. Sci. 53:171-181 crossref(new window)

McDonald, P., A. R Henderson and S. J. E. Heron. 1991. The Biochemistry of Silage. Second Edition. Chalcombe Publications. p. 344

Meeske, R. and H. M. Basson. 1998. The effect of a lactic acid bacterial inoculant on maize silage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 70:239-247 crossref(new window)

Menke, K. H., L. Raab, A. Salewski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz and W. Schneider. 1979. The estimation of digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedstuffs from the gas production when they incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 92:217-222

Menke, K. H. and H. Steingass. 1989. Estimation of energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis an in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 28:7- 55

Miron, J. and D. Ben-Ghedalia. 1997. Digestibility by sheep of direct cut alfalfa silage made with ozonated cotton stalks. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 67:311-317 crossref(new window)

Muck, R. F. 1988. Factors influencing silage quality and their implications for management. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2992-3002

Ots, M. and O. Kart. 2003. Effect of grain species on purine derivative excretion via urine in feeding leguminous silage to rams. Vet. Zootech. 22(44):73-77

Pearse, E. S. and H. O. Hartley. 1966. Biometrika tables for statisticians. Vol. 1. Camb. University Press

Phillips, W. A. and L. C. Penlum. 1984. Digestibility of wheat and alfalfa silage with and without wheat straw. J. Anim. Sci. 59:476-482

Rosales, M., M. Gill, C. D. Wood and A. W. Speedy. 1998. Associative effect in vitro of mixtures of tropical fodder trees. In: In vitro Techniques for measuring nutrient supply to ruminants. (Ed. E. R. Deaville, E. Owen, A. T. Adesogan and C. Rymer). BSAS Occasional Publications. Edinburgh, UK. pp. 175-177

Ross, G. J. S. 1987. Maximum likelihood program (a manual). Rothamsted Experimental Station. Harpenden, UK

Rubanza, C. D. K., M. N. Shem, R. Otsyina, T. Ichinohe and T. Fujihara. 2003. Nutritive Evaluation of Some Browse Tree Legume Foliages Native to Semi-arid Areas in Western Tanzania. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 16(10):1429-1437

Singh, K., H. Honig, M. Wermke and E. Zimmer. 1996. Fermentation pattern and changes in cell wall constituents of straw-forage silages, straw and partners during storage. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 61:137-153 crossref(new window)

Statistica, 1993. Statistica for windows release 4.3, StatSoft, Inc. 1993. Tulsa, OK

Strockey, W. L. 1990. Evaluation of sodium acetate-treated alfalfa silage for lactating dairy cows. J. Prod. Agric. 3:381-385