JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Dietary Bacillus-based Probiotic on Growth Performance, Nutrients Digestibility, Blood Characteristics and Fecal Noxious Gas Content in Finishing Pigs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Dietary Bacillus-based Probiotic on Growth Performance, Nutrients Digestibility, Blood Characteristics and Fecal Noxious Gas Content in Finishing Pigs
Chen, Y.J.; Min, B.J.; Cho, J.H.; Kwon, O.S.; Son, K.S.; Kim, H.J.; Kim, I.H.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of supplementation with bacillus-based probiotic (Bacillus subtilis, ; Bacillus coagulans, and Lactobacillus acidophilus, ) on finishing pigs growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content and to determine the optimal addition level of this probiotic preparation. A total of forty eight pigs with an initial body weight (BW) of were allotted to three dietary treatments (four pigs per pen with four pens per treatment) according to a randomized complete block design. Dietary treatment included: 1) CON (basal diet); 2) BP1 (basal diet+bacillus-based probiotic 0.1%) and 3) BP2 (basal diet+bacillus-based probiotic 0.2%). The experiment lasted 6 weeks. Through the entire experimental period, ADG was improved by 11% (p<0.05) in pigs fed diets supplemented with 0.2% bacillus-based probiotic compared to pigs fed the basal diet. ADFI and gain/feed were not affected by the treatments (p>0.05). Supplementation of bacillus-based probiotic did not affect either DM and N digestibilities or blood characteristics (p>0.05) of pigs. Fecal ammonia nitrogen (-N) measured at the end of experiment was reduced (p<0.05) when pigs were fed the diet with 0.2% bacillus-based probiotic. Fecal butyric acid concentration also decreased significantly (p<0.05) whereas acetic acid and propionic acid concentrations were not affected (p>0.05) when pigs were fed diets with added bacillus-based probiotic. In conclusion, dietary supplementation of bacillus-based probiotic can increase growth performance and decrease fecal noxious gas content concentration.
 Keywords
Probiotics;Digestibility;Blood Characteristics;Fecal Noxious Gas;Finishing Pigs;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Dietary inclusion of different multi-strain complex probiotics; effects on performance in broilers, British Poultry Science, 2017, 58, 1, 83  crossref(new windwow)
2.
The use of Lactobacillus as an alternative of antibiotic growth promoters in pigs: A review, Animal Nutrition, 2017, 3, 1, 1  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Effects of a Bacillus -based probiotic and dietary energy content on the performance and nutrient digestibility of wean to finish pigs, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 221, 54  crossref(new windwow)
4.
The Effect of Bacillus-based Feed Additive on Growth Performance, Nutrient Digestibility, Fecal Gas Emission, and Pen Cleanup Characteristics of Growing-finishing Pigs, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015, 28, 7, 999  crossref(new windwow)
5.
Effect of dietary supplementation with a probiotic ( Enterococcus faecium ) on production performance, excreta microflora, ammonia emission, and nutrient utilization in ISA brown laying hens, Poultry Science, 2016, 95, 12, 2829  crossref(new windwow)
6.
Effects of dietary supplementation with Bacillus subtilis LS 1–2 fermentation biomass on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, cecal microbiota and intestinal morphology of weanling pig, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2014, 188, 102  crossref(new windwow)
7.
Effects of intrauterine growth retardation and Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation on growth performance, intestinal development and immune function of piglets during the suckling period, European Journal of Nutrition, 2016  crossref(new windwow)
8.
The effect of probiotic BioPlus 2B® on growth performance, dry matter and nitrogen digestibility and slurry noxious gas emission in growing pigs, Livestock Science, 2009, 120, 1-2, 35  crossref(new windwow)
9.
Dietary Enterococcus faecalis LAB31 Improves Growth Performance, Reduces Diarrhea, and Increases Fecal Lactobacillus Number of Weaned Piglets, PLOS ONE, 2015, 10, 1, e0116635  crossref(new windwow)
10.
Characterization and antimicrobial activity of lactic acid bacteria from fermentative bioreactors during hydrogen production using cassava processing wastewater, Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016, 284, 1  crossref(new windwow)
11.
Effect of probiotics supplementation in diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, faecal microbial population and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2013, 41, 1, 23  crossref(new windwow)
12.
Effects of multistrain probiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, faecal microbial shedding, faecal score and noxious gas emission in weaning pigs, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2016, 100, 6, 1130  crossref(new windwow)
13.
Effect of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis supplementation in diets with low- and high-protein content on ileal crude protein and amino acid digestibility and intestinal microbiota composition of growing pigs, Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, 2017, 8, 1  crossref(new windwow)
14.
Paecilomyces variotii: A Fungus Capable of Removing Ammonia Nitrogen and Inhibiting Ammonia Emission from Manure, PLOS ONE, 2016, 11, 6, e0158089  crossref(new windwow)
15.
Effects of probiotic supplementation in different nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profiles, fecal microflora and noxious gas emission in weaning pig, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2017, 97, 4, 1335  crossref(new windwow)
16.
Effects of Bacillus subtilis UBT-MO2 on growth performance, relative immune organ weight, gas concentration in excreta, and intestinal microbial shedding in broiler chickens, Livestock Science, 2013, 155, 2-3, 343  crossref(new windwow)
17.
Effect of direct-fed microbial on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal noxious gas emission, fecal microbial flora and diarrhea score in weanling pigs, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 200, 86  crossref(new windwow)
18.
Effects of supplementing growing-finishing pig diets with Bacillus spp. probiotic on growth performance and meat-carcass grade qualitytraits, Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 2016, 45, 3, 93  crossref(new windwow)
19.
Effects of citrus pulp, fish by-product and Bacillus subtilis fermentation biomass on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and fecal microflora of weanling pigs, Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2014, 56, 1, 10  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Adlerberth, I., M. Cerquetti, I. Poilane, A. Wold and A. Collignon. 2000. Mechanisms of colonisation and colonisation resistance of the digestive tract. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 11:223-239

2.
Alexopoulos, C., I. E. Georgoulakis, A. Tzivara, C. S. Kyriakis, A. Govaris and S. C. Kyriakis. 2004. J. Vet. Med. Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 51:306

3.
AOAC. 1995. Official method of analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC

4.
Apgar, G. A., E. T. Kornegay, M. D. Lindemann and C. M. Wood. 1993. The effect of feeding various levels of Bifidobacteriurn globosurn A on the performance, gastrointestinal measurements, and immunity of weanling pigs and on the performance and carcass measurements of growing-finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2173-2179

5.
Argenzio, R. A. and M. Southworth. 1974. Sites of organic acid production and absorption in gastrointestinal tract of the pig. Am. J. Physiol. 228:454-460

6.
Bloksma, N., E. De Heer, M. Van Dijk and M. Willers. 1979. Adjuvanticity of Lactobacilli. I. Differential effects of viable and killed bacteria. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 37:367-375

7.
Bomba, A., R. Nemcova, S. Gancarcıkova, R. Herich, P. Guba and D. Mudronova. 2002. Improvement of the probiotic effect of micro-organisms by their combination with maltodextrins, fructo-oligosaccharides and polyunsaturated fatty acids. Br. Journal of Nutrition. 88 (Suppl.)1:95-99 crossref(new window)

8.
Busse, F. W. 1993. Comparison measurements of the house climate in swine stables with and without respiratory diseases or cannibalism. In: Livestock Environment (Ed. E. Collins and C. Boon). Fourth International Symposium, University of Warwick, Coventry, England. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI. pp. 904- 908

9.
Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified regents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8:131

10.
Chen, Y. J., K. S. Son, B. J. Min, J. H. Cho, O. S. Kwon and I. H. Kim. 2005a. Effects of dietary probiotic on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1464-1468

11.
Chen, Y. J., K. S. Son, B. J. Min, J. H. Cho, O. S. Kwon and I. H. Kim. 2005b. Effects of dietary probiotic on growth performance, nutrients digestibility, blood characteristics and fecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18(10):1464-1468

12.
Crook, B., J. F. Robertson, S. A. T. Glass, E. M. Botheroyd, J. Lacey and M. D. Topping. 1991. Airborne dust, ammonia, microorganisms and antigens in pig confinement houses and the respiratory health of exposed farm-workers. Am. Indust. Hygiene Assoc. J. 52:271-279

13.
Drummond, J. G., S. E. Curtis, J. Simon and H. W. Norton. 1980. Effects of aerial ammonia on growth and health of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 50:1085-1091

14.
Dunne, C., L. Murphy, S. Flynn, L. O'Mahony, S. O'Halloran, M. Feeney, D. Morrissey, G. Thornton, G. Fitzgerald, C. Daly, B. Kiely, E. M. M. Quigley, G. C. O'Sullivan, F. Shanahan and J. Kevin. 1999. Probiotics: from myth to reality. Demonstration of functionality in animal models of disease and in human clinical trials. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 76:279-292 crossref(new window)

15.
Ferket, P. R., E. van Heugten, T. A. T. G. van Kempen and R. Angel. 2002. Nutritional strategies to reduce environmental emissions from nonruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (E. Suppl. 2):E168-E182

16.
Fernandes, C. F. and K. M. Shahani. 1990. Anticarcinogenic and immunological properties of dietary lactobacilli. J. Food Prot. 53:704-710

17.
Hong, J. W., I. H. Kim, O. S. Kwon, J. H. Kim, B. J. Min and W. B. Lee. 2002. Effects of dietary probiotics supplementation on growth performance and fecal gas emission in nursing and finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 44:305-314

18.
Ji, F. and S. W. Kim. 2002. Reducing odor in swine production: Effect of enzymes and probiotics on ammonia production. J. Anim. Sci. Vol. 80 (Suppl. 1)

19.
Jonsson, E. and P. Conway. 1992. Probiotics for pigs. In: (Ed. R. Fuller) Probiotics: The Scientific Basis. Chapman and Hall, London. pp. 260-316

20.
Kil, D. Y., S. J. Lim, J. Z. Tian, B. G. Kim, K. S. Kim and Y. Y. Kim. 2004. Effect of continuous feeding of probiotics on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood urea nitrogen and immune responses in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 46:39-48

21.
Kim, I. H., J. D. Hancock, R. H. Hines and C. R. Risley. 1993. Effects of cellulase and bacterial feed additives on the nutritional value of sorghum grain for finishing pigs. Kansas Agric. Exp. Sta. Rep. Prog. No. 695:144

22.
Kluber, E. F., D. S. Pollmann and F. Blecha. 1985. Effect of feeding Streptococcus faecium to artificially reared pigs on growth, hematology and cell-mediated immunity. Nutr. Rep. Int. 32:57

23.
Kornegay, E. T. and C. R. Risley. 1996. Nutrient digestibilities of a corn-soybean meal diet as influenced by Bacillus products fed to finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 74:799-805

24.
Kornegay, E. T., C. M. Wood, G. G. Ball and C. R. Risley. 1990. Use of Lactobacillus acidophilus for growing and finishing pigs. VA Polytech. Inst. State Univ. Anim. Sci. Res. Rep. 9:13

25.
Lessard, M. and G. J. Brisson. 1987. Effect of a lactobacillus fermentation product on growth, immune response and fecal enzyme activity in weaned pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 67:509

26.
Lim, H. S., B. H. Kim and I. K. Paik. 2004. Effects of Natufermen$^{\circR}$ supplementation to the diet on the performance of weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 46:981-988

27.
Mackie, R. I., P. G. Stroot and V. H. Varel. 1998. Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1331-1342

28.
Malin, M., H.Suomalainen, M. Saxelin and E. Isolauri. 1996. Promotion of IgA immune response in patients with Crohn's disease by oral bacteriotherapy with Lactobacillus GG. Annals Nutr. Metab. 40:137-145 crossref(new window)

29.
Maxwell, C. V., D. S. Buchanan, F. N. Owens, S. E. Gilliland, W. G. Luce and R. Vencl. 1983. Effect of probiotic supplementation on performance, fecal parameters and digestibility in growing-finishing swine. Oklahoma Agric. Exp. Sta. Anim. Sci. Res. Rep. pp. 114:157

30.
Nousiainen, J. and J. Setala. 1993. Lactic acid bacteria as animal probiotics. In Lactic Acid Bacteria. (Ed. S. Salminen and A. von Wright). New York, Marcel Dekker. pp. 315-356

31.
NRC. 1998. Nutrient requirement of pigs. 10th Edition. National Research Council, Academy Press. Washington, DC

32.
O'Neill, D. H. and V. R. Phillips. 1992. A review of the control of odour nuisance from livestock buildings: Part 3, properties of the odorous substances which have been identified in livestock wastes or in the air around them. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 53:23-50 crossref(new window)

33.
Otto, E. R., M. Yokoyama, S. Hengemuehle, R. D. von Bermuth, T. van Kempen and N. L. Trottier. 2003. Ammonia, volatile fatty acids, phenolics, and odor offensiveness in manure from growing pigs fed diets reduced in protein concentration. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1754-1763

34.
Park, D. Y., H. Namkung and I. K. Paik. 2001. Effects of supplementary enzymes or probiotics on the performance and ammonia gas production in weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. (Kor.) 43:485-496

35.
Perdigon, G., S. Alvarez and A. Pesce de Ruiz Holgado. 1991. Immunoadjuvant activity of oral Lactobacillus casei: influence of dose on the secretory immune response and protective capacity in intestinal infections. Dairy Res. 58:485-496 crossref(new window)

36.
SAS. 1996. SAS user's guide. Release 6.12 edition. SAS Institute. Inc Cary NC. USA

37.
Shon, K. S., J. W. Hong, O. S. Kwon, B. J. Min, W. B. Lee, I. H. Kim, Y. H. Park and I. S. Lee. 2005. Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri-based direct-fed microbial supplementation for growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:370-374

38.
Slanina, S. 1994. Forest dieback and ammonia-a typical Dutch problem. Chemistry International. 16:2-3

39.
Spoelstra, S. F. 1980. Origin of objectionable odorous components in piggery wastes and the possibility of applying indicator components for studying odour development. Agric. Env. 5:241-260 crossref(new window)

40.
Stavric, S. and E. T. Kornegay. 1995. Microbial probiotic for pigs and poultry. Biotechnology in Animal Feeds and Animal Feeding. (Ed. R. J. Wallace and A. Chesson). Weinheim:VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH. pp. 205-231

41.
Takahashi, T., E. Nakagawa, T. Nara, T. Yajima and T. Kuwata. 1998. Effects of orally ingested bifidobacterium longum on the mucosal IgA response of mice to dietary antigens. Bio. Biotechnol. Biochem. 62:10-15 crossref(new window)

42.
van Breemen, N., P. A. Burrough, E. J. Velthorst, H. F. van Dobben, Toke de Wit, T. B. Ridder, H. F. R. Reijnders. 1982. Soil acidification from atmospheric ammonium sulphate in forest canopy throughfall. Nat. 299:548-550 crossref(new window)

43.
Vandenbergh, P. A. 1993. Lactic acid bacteria, their metabolic products and interference with microbial growth. FEMS Microbiology Review. 12:221-238 crossref(new window)

44.
Vitini, E., S. Alvarez, M. Medina, M. Medici, M. V. de Budeguer and G. Perdigon. 2000. Gut mucosal immunostimulation by lactic acid bacteria. Biocell. 24:223-232

45.
Wenk, C. 2000. Recent advances in animal feed additives such as metabolic modifiers, antimicrobial agents, probiotics, enzymes and highly available minerals. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:86- 95

46.
Xuan, Z. N., J. D. Kim, K. N. Heo, H. J. Jung, J. H. Lee, Y. K. Han, Y. Y. Kim and I. H. Han. 2001. Study on the development of a probiotics complex for weaned pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:1425-1428