Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Modification of Microclimate to Improve Milk Production in Tropical Rainforest of Thailand
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Modification of Microclimate to Improve Milk Production in Tropical Rainforest of Thailand
Suriyasathaporn, W.; Boonyayatra, S.; Kreausukon, K.; Pinyopummintr, T.; Heuer, C.;
  PDF(new window)
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of electric fan installation for milk production improvement of dairy cattle in Thailand. The study was conducted using 2 small-holder dairy farms in Chiang Mai province, during April to August 2004. Electric fans were installed in front of each row of cows. Each of the two rows of cows in the barn was defined as an experimental unit, thus each farm had two experimental units. The fans were operated alternately in 7-day intervals between rows of cows within each farm during the day or between 8.00 am to 8.00 pm. Non-operation periods were used as control. Milk yields were recorded. Data on environmental temperature and humidity were obtained from Chiang Mai Meteorological Center. Result from statistically analysis of milk record suggested an interaction between lactation period and fan installation. Therefore, this interaction term of lactation period and fan installation (PERIOD_FAN) was added as a variable to the regression model. Due to the repeated data collection of milk yield from the same cow (alternate week), milk yield was analyzed by repeated measure analysis (Mixed model). Least square means were calculated for all levels and used to compare between each pair-wise values. The final data were collected from the total of 18 cows with 2,072 data. Overall means and SEM of milk yields and days in milk separated into farm were and , and and days for farm A and farm B, respectively. For multivariable analysis, only PERIOD_FAN and humidity were significantly associated with milk yield. Only the first period of lactation showed that the amount of milk yields during fan installation was higher than that of non-fan installation (p<0.05). Cows with fan installation produced approximately 1.2 kg/cow more milk than cows without fan installation during this period. In conclusion, the use of electric fan operated during the day time increased milk production of cows during the first period of lactation.
Dairy Cattle;Fans;Milk;Period of Lactation;Thailand;
 Cited by
Armstrong, D. V. 1994. Heat stress interaction with shade and cooling. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2044-2050 crossref(new window)

Armstrong, D. V., M. E. Wise, M. T. Torabi, F. Wiersma, R Hunter. and E. Kopel. 1988. Effect of different cooling system on milk production of late lactation Holstein cow during high ambient temperature. J. Dairy Sci. 71(suppl. 1):212 (Abstr.)

Barash, H., N. Silanikove, A. Shamay and E. Ezra. 2001. Interrelationships among ambient temperature, day length, and milk yield in dairy cows under a Mediterranean climate. J Dairy Sci. 84:2314-2320 crossref(new window)

Bayer, W., H. Hippen, D. Steinhauf and J. H. Weniger. 1980. Some effects of high ambient temperature and different levels of relative humidity on thermoregulation and performance traits of lactating cows. Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie. 97:9-20 crossref(new window)

Berman, A., Y. Folman, M. Kaim, M. Mamen, Z. Herz, D. Wolfenson, A. Arieli and Y. Graber. 1985. Upper crical temperatures and forced ventilation effects for high-yielding dairy cows in a subtropical climate. J. Dairy Sci. 68:1488-1495 crossref(new window)

Bianca, W. 1965. Reviews of the progress of dairy science. Section A. Physiology. Cattle in a hot environment. J. Dairy Res. 32:291-345 crossref(new window)

Fuguay, J. W. 1981. Heat stress as it affects animal production. J. Anim. Sci. 52:164-174 crossref(new window)

Grummer, R. R., D. G. Mashek and A. Hayirli. 2004. Dry matter intake and energy balance in the transition period. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 20:447-470 crossref(new window)

Hirayama, T and K. Katoh. 2004. Effects of heat exposure and restricted feeding on behavior, digestibility and growth hormone secretion in goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:655- 658 crossref(new window)

Igono, M. O., H. D. Johnson, B. J. Steeven, G. F. Krause and D. Shanklin. 1987. Physiological, productive, and economic benefits of shade, spray, and fan system versus shade for Holstein cows during summer heat. J. Dairy Sci. 70:1069-1079 crossref(new window)

Johnson, H. D. 1989. The lactating cow in the various ecosystems: environmental effects on its productivity. Proceedings of the FAO Expert Consultation. Bangkok, Thailand 7-11 July 1989

Kaewkamchan, S., P. Vijchulata, P. Chairatanayuth, S. Sintuvanich, V. Santisopasri, S. Surapat and K. Nithichai. 2003. Factors effecting yield and compositions of milk from dairy cattle raised under tropical country. Proc. 41st Kasetsart Univ. Ann. Conf. Subject: Animals and Veterinary Medicine, pp. 401-408

McDowell, D., N. Hooven and K. Cameron. 1979. Effects of climate on performance of Holsteins in first lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 68:2418-2435 crossref(new window)

Ominski, K. H., A. D. Kennedy, K. M. Wittenberg and S. A. Moshtaghi Nia. 2002. Physiological and production responses to feeding schedule in lactating dairy cows exposed to shortterm, moderate heat stress. J. Dairy Sci. 85:730-737 crossref(new window)

Pongpiachan, P., P. Rodtian and K. Ota. 2000. Lactation in crossand purebred Friesian cows in northern Thailand and analyses on effects of tropical climate on their lactation. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1316-1322 crossref(new window)

Ravagnolo, O. and I. Misztal. 2002. Effect of heat stress on nonreturn rate in Holsteins: fixed-model analyses. J. Dairy Sci. 85:3101-3106 crossref(new window)

Regan, W. M. and G. W. Richardson. 1938. Reactions of dairy cows to changes in environmental temperature. J. Dairy Sci. 21:73 crossref(new window)

Roman-Ponce, H., W. W. Thatcher, D. E. Buffington, C. J. Wilcox and H. H. Van Horn. 1977. Physiological and production responses of dairy cattle to a shade structure in a subtropical environment. J. Dairy Sci. 60:424-430 crossref(new window)

SAS Institute, Inc. 1997. SAS/STAT software: changes and enhancements through release 6.12. Cary, NC

Sevi, A., M. Albenzio, G. Annicchiarico, M. Caroprese, R. Marino and L. Taibi. 2002. Effects of ventilation regimen on the welfare and performance of lactating ewes in summer. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2349-2361

Suriyasathaporn, W., C. Heuer, E. N. Noordhuizen-Stassen and Y. H. Schukken. 2000. Hyperketonemia and the impairment of udder defense: a review. Vet. Res. 31:397-412 crossref(new window)

Suriyasathaporn, W., K. Kanistanon, W. Kowitayakorn, W. Punyapornwittaya and K. Kreausukon. 2003. Defining the coefficients for the calculation of standard milk production and the average daily milk production for the whole lactation. Thai J. Vet. Med. 33:63-71

Suriyasathaporn, W., P. Maneeratanarungroj, S. Sangmaneedej, P. Tungtanatanich, S. Takong, U. Parinyasutinun and U. Pangjuntuk. 2002. Relationship among having mud in milking cow barns, somatic cell counts and decreased milk yield in Thai dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 85(Suppl 1):304-305(Abstr.)

Tumwasorn, S., K. Markvichitr and P. Duangpatra. 1999. Effects of breeds and levels of management on milk yield, body condition, and artificial insemination index in dairy cattle. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 32:55-61

West, J. W. 2003. Effect of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86:2131-2144 crossref(new window)

West, J. W., B. G. Mullinix and J. K. Bernard. 2003. Effects of hot, humid weather on milk temperature, dry matter intake, and milk yield of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:232-242 crossref(new window)