JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Animal Model Versus Conventional Methods of Sire Evaluation in Sahiwal Cattle
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Animal Model Versus Conventional Methods of Sire Evaluation in Sahiwal Cattle
Banik, S.; Gandhi, R.S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A total of 1,367 first lactation records of daughters of 81 sires, having 5 or more progeny were used to evaluate sires by 3 different methods viz., least squares (LS), best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) and derivative free restricted maximum likelihood (DFREML) method. The highest and lowest overall average breeding value of sires for first lactation 305 days or less milk yield was obtained by BLUP (1,520.72 kg) and LS method (1,502.22 kg), respectively. The accuracy, efficiency and stability of different sire evaluation methods were compared to judge their effectiveness. The error variance of DFREML method was lowest () and its coefficient of determination of fitting the model was highest (33.39%) revealing that this method of sire evaluation was most efficient and accurate as compared to other methods. However, the BLUP method was most stable amongst all the methods having coefficient of variation (%) very near to unadjusted data (18.72% versus 19.89%). The higher rank correlations (0.7979 to 0.9568) between different sire evaluation methods indicated that there was higher degree of similarity of ranking sires by different methods ranging from about 80 to 96 percent. However, the DFREML method seemed to be the most effective sire evaluation method as compared to other methods for the present set of data.
 Keywords
Animal Model;BLUP;Milk Yield;Sahiwal Cattle;Sire Evaluation;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Deb, S. M., M. Gurnani and C. T. Chacko. 1998. Comparison of sire evaluation methods under field conditions. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 51(4):210-215

2.
Dempfle, L. 1977. Comparison of several sire evaluation methods in dairy cattle breeding. Livestock Prod. Sci. 4(2):129-139 crossref(new window)

3.
Deulkar, P. B. and M. D. Kothekar. 1999. Sire evaluation considering first lactation yield for improvement of lifetime production in Sahiwal. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(4):240-242

4.
Gandhi, R. S. and M. Gurnani. 1991. Accuracy of different methods of sire evaluation in Sahiwal cattle. Indian Vet. J. 68(7):659-662

5.
Gaur, G. K., V. N. Tripathi, S. Mukherjee and V. K. Choudhary. 2001. Efficiency of sire evaluation procedures in Frieswal cattle. Indian J. Vet. Res. 10(2):1-6

6.
Harvey, W. R. 1987. Least squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. ARS H-4, USDA, Washington, DC

7.
Henderson, C. R. 1975. Use of relationship among sires to increase accuracy of sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 58(11):1731-1738

8.
Jain, A. and D. K. Sadana. 2000. Sire evaluation using animal model and conventional methods in Murrah buffaloes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13(9):1196-1200

9.
Meyer, K. 1989. Restricted Maximum Likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genet. Select. Evol. 21:317-340

10.
Meyer, K. 1998. DFREML (Derivative Free Restricted Maximum Likelihood) Programme. Version 3.0$\beta$. User notes. University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia

11.
Parekh, H. B. and M. Singh. 1989. Efficiency of different procedures of dairy sire evaluation using crossbred progeny. Indian J. Dairy. Sci. 42(3):482-488

12.
Robertson, A. and J. M. Randel. 1954. The performance of heifers got by artificial insemination. J. Agric. Sci. 44:184-192 crossref(new window)

13.
Sahana, G. 1996. Effectiveness of sire evaluation methods for milk production along with auxiliary traits vis-à-vis other methods in crossbred cattle. Ph.D. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Deemed University, Karnal, India

14.
Sahana, G. and M. Gurnani. 1999. Efficacy of auxiliary traits in estimation of breeding value of sires for milk production. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12(4):511-514

15.
Singh, P. K. and B. P. Singh. 1999. Efficacy of different methods in genetic evaluation of Murrah sires. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 69(12):1044-1047

16.
Singh, R. 1992. Genetic evaluation of Sahiwal bulls on the basis of daughter's multiple traits under selection. M.Sc. Thesis, National Dairy Research Institute, Deemed University, Karnal, India

17.
Tajane, K. R. and A. V. Rai. 1990. Efficiency of sire evaluation methods to improve milk yield of SahiwalxHolstein-Friesian cattle. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 60(1):183-191

18.
Vij, P. K. and M. S. Tiwana. 1988. A note on evaluation of buffalo sires. Indian J. Dairy Sci. 41(4):500-501