JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Genetic Parameters Estimated for Sexual Maturity and Weekly Live Weights of Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica)
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Genetic Parameters Estimated for Sexual Maturity and Weekly Live Weights of Japanese Quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica)
Sezer, Metin;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Covariance components and genetic parameters of weekly live body weight from hatching to six weeks of age and age of sexual maturation were estimated in a laying type Japanese quail line. The univariate and bivariate animal model analysis included hatching group and sex as fixed effects. Each trait was analysed with animal as random effect to fit the additive direct effect. Additional random effects incorporated in the models were changed according to the trait examined. The best model for a trait was chosen based on a likelihood ratio test, comparing the models with and without maternal additive genetic and maternal permanent environmental effects. Heritability estimates of live-weight at hatch and one to six weeks of age with their standard errors were 0.220.088, 0.390.099, 0.310.086, 0.380.056, 0.460.055, 0.500.059, and 0.560.062, respectively. Direct heritability value of age of sexual maturation was moderate (0.240.055). The variances due to permanent environmental effect of dam after one week of age and maternal genetic effect after two weeks of age were not important sources of variation. The correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects were negative and ranged from high to moderate values (-0.21 to -0.83). Among the weekly live weights, genetic correlations were generally high between not only successive but also early and late weightings. It suggests that selection for final weight may be based on early weight records. Genetic correlations between age of sexual maturation and live weights were low, favourable but had high standard errors. These results indicate that selection for high weight will potentially result in lower age of sexual maturation only with accurate determination of breeding values.
 Keywords
Genetic Parameter;Maternal Effect;Japanese Quail;REML;Age at Sexual Maturity;Weekly Weights;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Canonical Correlation Analysis for Estimation of Relationships between Sexual Maturity and Egg Production Traits upon Availability of Nutrients in Pullets,;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 11, pp.1576-1584 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Adkins-Regan, E. 1999. Foam produced by male Coturnix quail: What is its function? Auk 116:184-193.

2.
Aggrey, S. E., G. A. Ankra-Badu and H. L. Marks. 2003. Effect of long-term divergent selection on growth characteristics in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 82:538-542.

3.
Aggrey, S. A. and K. M. Cheng. 1994. Animal model analysis of genetic (co)variances for growth traits in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 73:1822-1828.

4.
Anthony, N. B., K. E. Nestor and H. L. Marks. 1996. Short-term selection for four-week body weight in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 75:1192-1197.

5.
Barbato, G. F. 1999. Genetic relationships between selection for growth and reproductive effectiveness. Poult. Sci. 78:444-452.

6.
Brah, G. S., M. L. Chaudhary and J. S. Sandhu. 1997. Genetic analyses of body weight in three lines of Japanese quail. Ind. J. Poult. Sci. 32:242-248.

7.
Camci, O., C. Erensayin and S. Aktan. 2002. Relations between age at sexual maturity and some production characteristics in quails. Arch. Geflugelk. 66:280-282.

8.
Chambers, J. R. 1990. Genetics of growth and meat production in chickens. In: Quantitative Genetic and Selection (Ed. R. D. Crawford). Poult. Breed. Genetic, Elsevier, Amsterdam. pp. 559-643.

9.
Clement, V., B. Bibe, E. Verrier, J. M. Elsen, E. Manfredi, J. Bouix and E. Hanocq. 2001. Simulation analysis to test the influence of model adequacy and data structure on the estimation of genetic parameters for traits with direct and maternal effects. Genet. Sel. Evol. 33:369-395. crossref(new window)

10.
Diop, M. and L. D. Van Vleck. 1998. Estimates of genetic parameters for growth traits of Gobra cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 66:349-355. crossref(new window)

11.
Gilmour, A. R., B. R. Cullis, S. J. Welham and R. Thompson. 2000. ASREML. NSW Agriculture, Orange, Australia.

12.
Hartmann, C., K. Johansson, E. Strandberg and L. Rydhmer. 2003. Genetic correlations between the maternal genetic effect on chick weight and the direct genetic effects on egg composition traits in a white leghorn line. Poult. Sci. 82:1-8.

13.
Hassen, Y., B. Fuerst-Waltl and J. Solkner. 2003. Genetic parameter estimates for birth weight, weaning weight and average daily gain in pure and crossbred sheep in Ethiopia. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 120:29-38. crossref(new window)

14.
Jensen, H., B. E. Saether, T. H. Ringsby, J. Tufto, S. C. Griffith and H. Ellegren. 2003. Sexual variation in heritability and genetic correlations of morphological traits in house sparrow (Passer domesticus). J. Evol. Biol. 16:1296-1307. crossref(new window)

15.
Kocak, C., O. Altan and Y. Akbas. 1995. Japon bıldırcınlarının cesitli verim Ozellikleri Uzerinde arastırmalar. Turkish J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 19:65-71.

16.
Liu, G., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Diegel. 1995. Correlated responses t long-term divergent selection for eight-week body weight in chickens: growth, sexual maturity, and egg production. Poult. Sci. 74:1259-1268.

17.
Marin, R. H. and D. G. Satterlee. 2004. Clocal gland and testes development in male Japanese quail selected for divergent adrenocortical responsiveness. Poult. Sci. 83:1028-1034.

18.
Marks, H. L. 1996. Long-term selection for body weight in Japanese quail under different environments. Poult. Sci. 75:1198-1203.

19.
Mayer, K. 1989. Restricted maximum likelihood to estimate variance components for animal models with several random effects using a derivative-free algorithm. Genetique, Selection et Evolution. 21:317-340. crossref(new window)

20.
Michalska, E. 1994. Direct and correlated response to the index with constrains in selection for body weight and feed conversion ratio in Japanese quail. Proc. 5th WCGALP, Uni. of Guelph, Ontario, Canada. 19:103-106.

21.
Minvielle, F. and Y. Oguz. 2002. Effects of genetic and breeding on egg quality of Japanese quail. World's Poult. Sci. J. 58:291-295. crossref(new window)

22.
Mohan, J., R. P. Moudgal, K. Venkata, H. Sastry, J. Tyagi and R. Singh. 2002. Effects of hemicastration and castration on foam production and its relationship with fertility in male Japanese quail. Theriogenol. 58:29-39. crossref(new window)

23.
Morrell, C. H. 1998. Likelihood ratio testing of variance components in the linear mixed effects model using restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 54:1560-1568. crossref(new window)

24.
Narayan, A. D. 1976. Inbreeding components of body weight and growth rate in Japanese quail. Br. Poult. Sci. 17(2):513-517. crossref(new window)

25.
Oruwari, B. M. and T. Brody. 1988. Roles of age, body weight, and composition in the initiation of sexual maturation of Japanese quail (Cotunix coturnix Japonica). Br. Poult. Sci. 29:481-488. crossref(new window)

26.
Reddish, J. M. and M. S. Lilburn. 2004. A comparison of growth and development patterns in diverse genotypes of broilers. 2. Pullet growth. Poult. Sci. 83:1072-1076.

27.
Reddish, J. M., K. E. Nestor and M. S. Lilburn. 2003. Effect of selection for growth on onset of sexual maturity in randombred and growth-selected lines of Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 82:187-191.

28.
Resende, R. O., E. N. Martins, P. C. Georg, E. Paiva, A. C. M. Conti, A. I. Santos, E. S. Sakaguti and A. E. Murakami. 2005. Variance components for body weight in Japanese quails (Coturnix japonica). Brazilian J. Poult. Sci. 7:23-25.

29.
Robinson, D. L. 1996: Models which might explain negative correlations between direct and maternal genetic effects. Livest. Prod. Sci. 45:111-122. crossref(new window)

30.
Saatci, M., I. Ap Dewi and A. R. Aksoy. 2003. Application of REML Procedure to estimate the genetic parameters of weekly liveweights in one-to-one sire and dam pedigree recorded Japanese quail. J. Anim. Bred. Genet. 120:23-28. crossref(new window)

31.
Schuler, L., N. Mielenz and S. Hempel. 1998. Asymmetry of the selection responses in performance traits of Japanese quails. Proc. 6th WCGALP, Uni. of New England, Armidale, Australia. 26:101-104.

32.
Sefton, A. E. and P. B. Siegel. 1974. Inheritance of body weight in Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 53:1597-1603.

33.
Siegel, P. B. and E. A. Dunnington. 1985. Reproductive complications associated with selection for broiler growth (Ed. W. G. Hill, J. M. Manson, D. Hewitt) In: Poultry Genetics and Breeding Longman Group Limited: Harlow, pp. 59-72.

34.
Siopes, T. D. and W. O. Wilson. 1980. Participation of the eyes in the photosexual response of Japanese quail (Cotunix coturnix japon). Biol. Reprod. 23:352-357. crossref(new window)

35.
Thomas, P. C. and S. D. Ahuja. 1988. Improvement of broiler quails of Cari through selective breeding. Poult. Guide 25:45-47.

36.
Toelle, V. D., G. B. Havenstein, K. E. Nestor and W. R. Harvey. 1991. Genetic and phenotypic relationships in Japanese quail: 1. Body weight, carcass, and organ measurements. Poult. Sci. 70(8):1679-1688.

37.
Tosh, J. J. and R. A. Kemp. 1994. Estimation of Variance Components for Lamb Weights in Three Sheep Populations. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1184-1190.

38.
Tullett, S. G. and G. F. Burton. 1982. Factors affecting the weight and water status of the chick at hatch. Br. Poult. Sci. 23:361-369. crossref(new window)

39.
Willham, R. L. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding. III. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. J. Anim. Sci. 35:1288-1293.