JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Response of Growth Performance, Cecal Fermentation Traits and In vitro Gas Production to Substitution of Soyhulls for Lignified Fiber in Rabbit Diets
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Response of Growth Performance, Cecal Fermentation Traits and In vitro Gas Production to Substitution of Soyhulls for Lignified Fiber in Rabbit Diets
Chang, Ying; Qin, Yinghe; Xiong, Yiqiang; Du, Yuchuan; Meng, Qingxiang;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A growth trial (Expt. 1) and an in vitro fermentation experiment (Expt. 2) were conducted to determine the response of growth performance, cecal fermentation characteristics and in vitro gas production to incremental levels of substitution of digestible fiber for lignified fiber in the diet of weaned rabbits. Three diets, formulated by substituting soyhulls (SH; used as digestible fiber source) for soybean straw (used as lignified fiber source) at substitution levels of 0, 25 and 50%, were used in a factorial design. In the growth trial (Expt. 1), increasing levels of SH substitution resulted in a quadratic increase in daily body weight gain rate (p<0.04) and feed conversion efficiency (p<0.02), but in a numerical decrease in dietary DM intake (p=0.15). When SH were included in the diet at 25% substitution level, rabbits had the highest rate of liveweight gain and feed conversion efficiency. As SH substitution level increased, pH values and ammonia-N of cecal contents linearly (p<0.001) decreased, but total VFA concentration linearly (p<0.03) increased. With incremental levels of SH substitution, the percentage of acetate and butyrate linearly (p<0.05) reduced, but the percentage of propionate and minor acids linearly (p<0.03) increased. Increasing the SH substitution levels tended to increase incidence of diarrhea. In the in vitro fermentation experiment (Expt. 2), regardless of origin of substrates fermented, increasing SH substitution level resulted in increased maximal gas production (p<0.001) and shortened gas production lag time, but had no effect on gas production rate (p>0.2). These observations suggest that incrementally feeding SH to rabbits could stimulate their cecal microbial activity, allowing cecal fermentation to shift towards favoring fiber digestion. In conclusion, digestible fiber from soyhulls may partially substitute for more lignified fiber, soybean straw, without having an adverse effect on cecal fermentative and microbial activity and growth performance. For growing rabbits, about 73% of total dietary NDF should be supplied by effective NDF, the remainder could come from digestible NDF, such as soyhulls.
 Keywords
Soyhulls;Weaned Rabbits;Growth Performance;Gas Production;Effective Fiber;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effect of Different Raising Techniques on In vivo Performance and Carcass and Meat Traits of Ischia Grey Rabbit,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 9, pp.1361-1366 crossref(new window)
2.
Effect of Feeding Head Lettuce, Water Spinach, Ruzi grass or Mimosa pigra on Feed Intake, Digestibility and Growth in Rabbits,;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 8, pp.1171-1177 crossref(new window)
3.
Seasonal Production Performance of Angora Rabbits under Sub-temperate Himalayan Conditions,;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 3, pp.416-420 crossref(new window)
4.
Effect of Inclusion of Hard Versus Soft Wheat Bran with Different Particle Size on Diet Digestibility, Growth Performance and Carcass Traits of Fattening Rabbits,;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 10, pp.1377-1385 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis (15th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia, USA.

2.
AOAC. 1996. Official Methods of Analysis (16th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, USA.

3.
Broderick, G. A. and J. H. Kang. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and amino acids in ruminal fluids and in vitro media. J. Dairy Sci. 63:64-75. crossref(new window)

4.
Candau, M., G. Delpon and J. Fjoramonti. 1979. Influence of the nature of cell wall carbohydrates on the anatomic functional development of the digestive tract in the rabbit. Ann. Zootech.(Paris). 28:127-134.

5.
Carabano, R., W. Motta-Ferreira, J. C. de Blas and M. J. Fraga. 1997. Substitution of beet pulp for alfalfa hay in diets for growing rabbits. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 65:249-256. crossref(new window)

6.
Cheeke, P. R. 1987. Rabbit Feeding and Nutrition. Academic Press, Inc., New York. pp. 359-368.

7.
Fraga, M. J., P. Perez de Ayal, R. Carabano and J. C. de Blas. 1991. Effect of type of fiber on the rate of passage and on the contribution of soft feces to nutrient intake of finishing rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1566-1574.

8.
Garcia, J., R. J. F. Galvez and J. C. de Blas. 1993. Effect of substitution of sugar-beet pulp for barley in diets for finishing rabbits on growth performance and on energy and nitrogen efficiency. J. Anim. Sci. 71:1823-1830.

9.
Garcia, J., R. Carabano and J. C. de Blas. 1999. Effect of fiber source on cell wall digestibility and rate of passage in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 77:898-905.

10.
Garcia, J., R. Carabano, L. Perez-Alba and J. C. de Blas. 2000. Effect of fiber source on cecal fermentation and nitrogen recycled through cecotrophy in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci. 78:638-646.

11.
Gidenne, T., R. Bellier and J. van Eys. 1998. Effect of the dietary fiber origin on the digestion and on the cecal fermentation pattern of the growing rabbit. Anim. Sci. 66:509-517. crossref(new window)

12.
Menke, K. H., L. Raab, A. Salewski, H. Steingass, D. Fritz and W. Schneider. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 93:217-222. crossref(new window)

13.
National Research Council. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 6th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.

14.
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev. ed. Natl. Acad. Sci., Washington, DC.

15.
National Research Council. 1977. Nutrient Requirements of Rabbits. 2nd rev. Natl. Acad. Sci. Washington, DC.

16.
Pond, W. G., D. C. Church and K. R. Pond. 1995. Basic Animal Nutrition and Feeding. 4th (Ed. John Wiley and Sons). New York. 451-459.

17.
SAS Institute. 1996. User's guide: statistics, version 6 editions. SAS Institute. Inc., Cary, NC.

18.
Roediger, W. E. W. 1980. Role of anaerobic bacteria in the metabolic welfare of the colonic mucosa in man. Gut. 21:793-798. crossref(new window)

19.
Schofield, P. 2000. Gas production (Chapter 10). In: Farm Animal Metabolism and Nutrition (Ed. J. P. F. D'Mello). CABI publishing, UK. 450.

20.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583. crossref(new window)

21.
Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutrient Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Ed. Cornell University Press. Ithaca, USA. 291-303.