JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Environmental Sustainability and Social Desirability Issues in Pig Feeding
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Environmental Sustainability and Social Desirability Issues in Pig Feeding
Yang, T.S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Feeding pigs used to be a means of managing domestic resources that may otherwise have been wasted into valuable animal protein. Feeding pigs thus was a form of husbandry. Following recent rapid industrial development, pig rearing has changed from extensive to intensive, but this transformation has been associated with major concerns. The concentration of large amounts of pig manure in small arrears is environmentally hazardous. Moreover, high densities of animals in intensive production systems also impose a health threat for both animals and humans. Furthermore, the use of growth promoters and preventive medicines for higher production efficiencies, such as in-feed antibiotics, also induces microbial resistance thus affects human therapeutics. In addition, consumers are questioning the ethics of treating animals in intensive production systems. Animal welfare, environmental and bio-safe issues are re-shaping the nature of pig production systems. Feeding pigs thus involves not only the consideration of economic traits, but also welfare traits and environmental traits. Thus, a focus on technological feasibility, environmental sustainability and social desirability is essential for successful feeding operations. Feeding pigs now involves multiple projects with different sustainability goals, but goal conflicts exist since no pattern or scenario can fulfill all sustainability goals and the disagreements are complicated by reduced or even no use of in-feed antibiotics. Thus it is difficult to feed pigs in a manner that meets all goals of high quality, safe product, eco- and bio-sustainability, animal welfare and profit. A sustainable pig production system thus requires a prioritization of goals based on understanding among consumers, society and producers and needs to view from both a local and global perspective.
 Keywords
Pig Feeding;Environmental Sustainability;Social Desirability;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effect of Nipple Angle on Water Disappearance by Pigs,;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2008. vol.21. 1, pp.120-123 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Aarestrup, F. M., F. Bager and J. S. Andersen. 2000. Association between the use of avilamycin for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers: epidemiological study and changes over time. Microb. Drug. Resist. 6:71-75. crossref(new window)

2.
Aarestrup, F. M., H. Kruse, E. Tast, A. M. Hammerum and L. B. Jensen. 2000. Associations between the use of antimicrobial agents for growth promotion and the occurrence of resistance among Enterococcus faecium from broilers and pigs in Denmark, Finland, and Norway. Microb. Drug. Resist. 6:63-70. crossref(new window)

3.
Adjiri-Awere, A. and T. A. Van Lunen. 2005. Subtherapeutic use of antibiotics in pork production: Risks and alternatives. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 85:117-130. crossref(new window)

4.
Apple, J. K., E. B. Kegley, C. V. Maxwell, Jr., L. K. Rakes, D. Galloway and T. J. Wistuba. 2005. Effects of dietary magnesium and short-duration transportation on stress response, postmortem muscle metabolism, and meat quality of finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1633-1645.

5.
Basset-Mens, C. and H. M. G. van der Werf. 2005. Scenario-based environmental assessment of farming systems: the case of pig production in France. Agri. Eco. Environ. 105:127-144. crossref(new window)

6.
Bird, A. R., T. Hayakawa, Y. Marsono, J. M. Gooden, I. R. Record, R. L. Correll and D. L. Topping. 2000. Coarse brown rice increases fecal and large bowel short-chain fatty acids and starch but lowers calcium in the large bowel of pigs. J. Nutr. 130:1780-1787.

7.
Brogden, K. A., M. Ackermann, P. B. McCray, Jr. and B. F. Tack. 2003. Antimicrobial peptides in animals and their role in host defences. Internat. J. Antimicrobiol. Agents. 22:465-478. crossref(new window)

8.
Brown, I., M. Warbhrst, J. Arcot, M. Playne, R. J. Illman and D. L. Topping. 1997. Fecal numbers of bifidobacteria are higher in pigs fed Bifidobacterium longum with a high amylase cornstarch than with a low amylase comstarch. J. Nutr. 127:1822-1827.

9.
Chapin, A., A. Rule, K. Gibson, T. Buckley and K. Schwab. 2005. Airborne multidrug-resistant bacteria isolated from a concentrated swine feeding operation. Environ. Health Perspect. 113:137-142. crossref(new window)

10.
Compagnolo, E. R., K. R. Johnson, A. Karpati, C. S. Rubin, D. W. Kolpin, M. T. Meyer, J. E. Esteban, R. W. Currier, K. Smith, K. M. Thu and M. McGeehin. 2002. Antimicrobial residues in animal waste and water resources proximal to large-scale swine and poultry feeding operations. Sci. Total Environ. 299:89-95. crossref(new window)

11.
Correa-Matos, N. J., S. M. Donovan, R. E. Isaacson, H. Rex Gaskins, B. A. White and K. A. Tappenden. 2003. Fermentable fiber reduces recovery time and improves intestinal function in piglets following salmonella typhimurium infection. J. Nutr. 133:1845-1852.

12.
Crittenden, R., S. Karppinen, S. Ojanen, M. Tenkanen, R. Fagerstrom, J. Matto, M. Saarela, T. Mattila-Sandholm and K. Poutanen. 2002. In vitro fermentation of cereal dietary fibre carbohydrates by probiotic and intestinal bacteria. J. Sci. Food Agri. 82:781-789. crossref(new window)

13.
Cromwell, G. L. 2002. Why and how antibiotics are used in swine production. Anim. Biotech. 13:7-27. crossref(new window)

14.
Dave, R. I. and N. P. Shah. 1998. Ingredient supplementation effects on viability of probiotic bacteria in yogurt. J. Daity Sci. 81:2804-2816.

15.
Davis, M. E., C. V. Maxwell, D. C. Brown, B. Z. de Rodas, Z. B. Johnson, E. B. Kegley, D. H. Hellwig and R. A. Dvorak. 2002. Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharides and(or) pharmacological additions of copper sulfate on growth performance and immunocompetence of weanling and growing/finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2887-2894.

16.
Doron, S. and S. L. Gorbach. 2006. Probiotics: their role in the treatment and prevention of disease. Expert Rev. Anti-infective Therapy. 4:261-275. crossref(new window)

17.
Duggan, C., J. Gannon and W. A. Walker. 2002. Protective nutrients and functional foods for the gastrointestinal tract. Amer. J. Clin. Nutr. 75:789-808.

18.
Durmic, Z., D. W. Pethick, B. P. Mullan, J. M. Accioly, H. Schulze and D. J. Hampson. 2002. Evaluation of large-intestinal parameters associated with dietary treatments designed to reduce the occurrence of swine dysentery. Br. J. Nutr. 88:159-169. crossref(new window)

19.
Estrada, A., M. D. Drew and A. Van Kessel. 2001. Effect of the dietary supplementation of fructooligosaccharides and bifidobacterium longum to early-weaned pigs on performance and fecal bacterial populations. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 81:141-148. crossref(new window)

20.
Ettle, T. and F. X. Roth. 2005. Dietary preferences for feeds varying in threonine concentration by the piglet. Physiol. Behav. 85(3):289-295. crossref(new window)

21.
Fairbrother, J. M., E. Nadeau and C. L. Gyles. 2005. Escherichia coli in postweaning diarrhea in pigs: an update on bacterial types, pathogenesis, and prevention strategies. Anim. Health Res. Rev. 6:17-39. crossref(new window)

22.
Franco, L. D., M. Fondevila, M. B. Lobera and C. Castrillo. 2005. Effect of combinations of organic acids in weaned pig diets on microbial species of digestive tract contents and their response on digestibility. J. Anim. Phy. Anim. Nutr. 89:88-93. crossref(new window)

23.
Ganz, T. 2003. Defensins: antimicrobial peptides of innate immunity. Nature Rev. Immuno. 3:710-720. crossref(new window)

24.
Grieshop, C. M., D. E. Reese and G. C. Fahey. Jr. 2001. Nonstarch polysaccharides and oligosaccharides in swine nutrition. In: Swine Nutrition (Ed. A. J. Lewis and L. L. Southern). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. p. 107.

25.
Hamscher, G., H. T. Pawelzick, S. Sczesny, H. Nau and J. Hartung. 2003. Antibiotics in dust originating from a pig-fattening farm: a new source of health hazard for farmers? Environ. Health Perspect. 111:1590-1594. crossref(new window)

26.
Han, I. K. and J. H. Lee. 2000. The role of synthetic amino acids in monogastric animal production. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:543-560.

27.
Han, I. K., J. H. Lee, X. S. Piao and L. Defa. 2001. Feeding and management system to reduce environmental pollution in swine production. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 14:432-444.

28.
Hardy, B. 1999. A world without growth promoters. Concepts Pig Sci. The first annual turtle lake science conf., Nottingham, UK.

29.
Hollis, G. R., S. D. Carter, T. R. Cline, T. D. Crenshaw, G. L. Cromwell, G. M. Hill, S. W. Kim, A. J. Lewis, D. C. Mahan, P. S. Miller, H. H. Stein and T. L. Veum. 2005. Effects of replacing pharmacological levels of dietary zinc oxide with lower dietary levels of various organic zinc sources for weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 83:2123-2129.

30.
Holt, J. P., L. J. Johnston, S. K. Baidoo and G. C. Shurson. 2006. Effects of a high-fiber diet and frequent feeding on behavior, reproductive performance, and nutrient digestibility in gestating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 84:946-955.

31.
ISO 14045. 1999. Environmental Management Standard-Life Cycle Assessment-Life Cycle Interpretation 1999 ISO, Geneva

32.
Kanis, E., K. H. De Greef, A. Hiemstra and J. A. van Arendonk. 2005. Breeding for societally important traits in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 83:948-957.

33.
Kerr, B. J., J. T. Yen, J. A. Nienaber and R. A. Easter. 2003. Influences of dietary protein level, amino acid supplementation and environmental temperature on performance, body composition, organ weights and total heat production of growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 81:1998-2007.

34.
Kim, Y. Y., D. Y. Kil, H. K. Oh and I. K. Han. 2005. Acidifier as an alternative material of antibiotics in animal feed. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1048-1060.

35.
Knowlton, K. F., J. S. Radcliffe, C. L. Novak and D. A. Emmerson. 2004. Animal management to reduce phosphorus losses to the environment. J. Anim. Sci. 82:E173-E195.

36.
Koopmans, S. J., A. C. Guzik, J. van der Meulen, R. Dekker, J. Kogut, B. J. Kerr and L. L. Southern. 2006. Effects of supplemental l-tryptophan on serotonin, cortisol, intestinal integrity, and behavior in weanling piglets J. Anim. Sci. 84:963-971.

37.
Kornegay, E. T., J. L. Evans and V. Ravindran. 1994. Effects of diet acidity and protein level or source of calcium on the performance, gastrointestinal content measurements, bone measurements, and carcass composition of gilt and barrow weanling pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2670-2680.

38.
Krapac, I. G., W. S. Dey, W. R. Roy, C. A. Smyth, E Storment, S. L. Sargent and J. D. Steele. 2002. Impacts of swine manure pits on ground water quality. Environ. Pollut. 120:475-492. crossref(new window)

39.
Kritas, S. K. and R. B. Morrison. 2005. Evaluation of probiotics as a substitute for antibiotics in a large pig nursery. Vet. Rec. 156:447-448.

40.
Lenis, N. P. and A. W. Jongbloed. 1999. New technologies in low pollution swine diets: diet manipulation and use of synthetic amino acids, phytase and phase feeding for reduction of nitrogen and phosphorus excretion and ammonia emission- Review. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 12:305-327.

41.
Li, Y. Z., B. J. Kerr, M. T. Kidd and H. W. Gonyou. 2006. Use of supplementary tryptophan to modify the behavior of pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 84:212-220.

42.
Losel, D. and R. Claus. 2005. Dose-dependent effects of resistant potato starch in the diet on intestinal skatole formation and adipose tissue accumulation in the pig. J. Vet. Med. A. Physiol. Pathol. Clin. Med. 52:209-212. crossref(new window)

43.
Mantovi, P., G. Bonazzi, E. Maestri and N. Marmiroli. 2003. Accumulation of copper and zinc from liquid manure in agricultural soils and crop plants. Plant and Soil. 250:249-257. crossref(new window)

44.
McGlone, J. J. and D. L. Anderson. 2002. Synthetic maternal pheromone stimulates feeding behavior and weight gain in weaned pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:3179-3183.

45.
Meunier-Salaun, M. C., S. A. Edwards and S. Robert. 2001. Effect of dietary fibre on the behaviour and health of the restricted fed sow. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 90:53-69. crossref(new window)

46.
Montagne, L., F. S. Cavaney, D. J. Hampson, J. P. Lalles and J. R. Pluske. 2004. Effect of diet composition on postweaning colibacillosis in piglets. J. Anim. Sci. 82:2364-2374

47.
Nahm, K. H. 2003. Influences of fermentable carbohydrates on shifting nitrogen excretion and reducing ammonia emission of pigs. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33:165-186. crossref(new window)

48.
Olsson, V. and J. Pickova. 2005. The influence of production systems on meat quality, with emphasis on pork. Ambio. 34:338-343.

49.
Pluske, J. R., P. M. Siba, W. P. David, D. Zorica, B. P. Mullan and D. J. Hampson. 1996. The incidence of swine dysentery in pigs can be reduced by feeding diets that limit the amount of fermentable substrate entering the large intestine. J. Nutr. 126:2920-2933.

50.
Pluske, J. R., D. Zorica, W. P. David, B. P. Mullan and D. J. Hampson. 1998. Confirmation of the role of rapidly fermentable carbohydrates in the expression of swine dysentery in pigs after experimental infection. J. Nutr. 128:1737-1744.

51.
Poulsen, H. D. 1989. Zinc oxide for weaned pigs. In : Proc. 40th Annu. Mtg. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Dublin, Ireland, pp. 8-10.

52.
Raghupathy, P., B. S. Ramakrishna, S. P. Oommen, M. S. Ahmed, G. Priyaa, J. Dziura, G. P. Young and H. J. Binder. 2006. Amylase-resistant starch as adjunct to oral rehydration therapy in children with diarrhea. J. Pediatr Gastroenterol. Nutr. 42:362-368. crossref(new window)

53.
Reddy, K. V., R. D. Yedery and C. Aranha. 2004. Antimicrobial peptides: premises and promises. Int. J. Antimicrob Agents. 24:536-547. crossref(new window)

54.
Seveno, N. A., D. Kallifidas, K. Smalla, J. D. van Elsas, J. M. Collard, A. D. Karagouni and E. M. H. Wellington. 2002. Occurrence and reservoirs of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment. Rev. Med. Microbio. 13:15-27.

55.
Shah, N. P. and R. R. Ravula. 2000. Influence of water activity of fermentation, organic acids production and viability of yogurt and probiotic bacteria. Aust. J. Dairy Technol. 55:127-131.

56.
Shihata, A. and N. P. Shah. 2002. Influence of addition of proteolytic strains of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. Bulgaricus to commercial ABT starter cultures on texture of yoghurt, exopolysaccharide production and survival of bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 12:765-772. crossref(new window)

57.
Shu, Q., F. Qu and H. S. Gill. 2001. Probiotic treatment using bifidobacterium lactis HN019 reduces weanling diarrhea associated with rotavirus and escherichia coli infection in a piglet model. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 33:171-177. crossref(new window)

58.
Stern, S., U. Sonesson, S. Gunnarsson, I. Oborn, K. I. Kumm and T. Nybrant. 2005. Sustainable development of food production: a case study on scenarios for pig production. Ambio. 34:402-407.

59.
Strid Eriksson, I. 2004. Environmental systems analysis of pig production-development and application of tools for evaluation of the environmental impact of feed choice. Doctoral thesis Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala.

60.
Strid Eriksson, I., H. Elmquist, S. Stern and T. Nybrant. 2005. Environmental systems analysis of pig production - the lmpact of feed choice. Internat. J. Life Cycle Assess. 10:143-154. crossref(new window)

61.
Su, J. J., B. Y. Liu and Y. C. Chang. 2003. Emission of greenhouse gas from livestock waste and wastewater treatment in Taiwan. Agri. Eco. Enviro. 95:253-263. crossref(new window)

62.
Sutton, A. L. and B. T. Richert. 2004. Nutrition and feed management strategies to reduce nutrient excretions and odors from swine manure. Water Sci. Technol. 49:397-404.

63.
Taylor, D. J. 1999. The responsible use of antibiotics in pig medicine. Pig J. 43:170-187.

64.
Tilman, D., K. G. Cassman, P. A. Matson, R. Naylor and S. Polasky. 2002. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671-677. crossref(new window)

65.
Tuohy, K. M., S. Kolida, A. M. Lustenberger and G. R. Gibson. 2001. The prebiotic effects of biscuits containing partially hydrolysed guar gum and fructo-oligosaccharides-a human volunteer study. Br. J. Nutr. 86:341-348. crossref(new window)

66.
Tzortzis, G., A. K. Goulas and G. R. Gibson. 2005. Synthesis of prebiotic galactooligosaccharides using whole cells of a novel strain, Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171. Appl. Microbio. Biotech. 68:412-416. crossref(new window)

67.
Verstegen, M. W. A. and B. A. Williams. 2002. Alternatives to the use of antibiotics as growth fromoters for monogastric animals. Anim. Biotechnol. 13:113-127. crossref(new window)

68.
Willig, S., D. Losel and R. Claus. 2005. Effects of resistant potato starch on odor emission from feces in swine production units. J. Agric. Food Chem. 53:1173-1178. crossref(new window)

69.
Wong, J. M., R. de Souza, C. W. Kendall, A. Emam and D. J. Jenkins. 2006. Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J. Clin.Gastroenterol. 40:235-243. crossref(new window)

70.
Yang, T. S. 2006. Invited commentary: Size concerns regarding pig hearts for xenotransplantation. Xenotrans. 13: 12-13. crossref(new window)

71.
Yang, T. S. and J. H. Lin. 1997. Variation of heart size and its correlation with growth performance and vascular space in domestic pigs. Anim. Sci. 64:523-528. crossref(new window)

72.
Yang, T. S., Y. L. Chang and C. K. Yen. 1997. Haemoperfusion treatment in pigs experimentally intoxicated by paraquat. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 16:709-715. crossref(new window)

73.
Yu, I. T., J. J. Su, J. F. Wu, S. L. Lee, C. C. Ju and H. T. Yen. 2005. Dietary modification for reducing electrical conductivity of piggery wastewater. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:0343-1347

74.
Zhang, G., C. R. Ross and F. Blecha. 2000. Porcine antimicrobial peptides: New prospects for ancient molecules of host defense. Vet. Res. 31:277-296. crossref(new window)

75.
Zhang, G., H. H. Y. Hiroshi, W. Hua, R. R. Christopher, T. Deryl and B. Frank. 1999. Cloning and characterization of the gene for a new epithelial beta-defensin. Genomic structure, hromosomal localization, and evidence for its constitutive expression. J. Biol. Chem. 274:24031-24037. crossref(new window)