JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Dehydrated Food Waste Products on Taiwan Native Chicken (Taishi No. 13)
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Dietary Inclusion of Dehydrated Food Waste Products on Taiwan Native Chicken (Taishi No. 13)
Chen, Kuo-Lung; Chang, Hwang-Jen; Yang, Ching-Ke; You, Shanq-Huei; Jenq, Horng-Der; Yu, Bi;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The effect of dehydrated food waste product (DFWP) inclusion in diets of Taiwan native chickens on the growth performance, carcass traits, clinical blood chemistry and nutrient digestibility was investigated with 320 male Taishi Native Chickens (Taishi No. 13). They were randomly allocated into four levels of DFWP inclusion (0, 5, 10, or 20%) treatment. Each treatment had 80 chickens with four replicates. At 15 weeks of age, 8 chickens were selected from each group for the nutrient digestibility trial. The results showed that body weight gain during the 0 to 4 week period decreased as the feed intake and feed conversion rate (FCR) increased linearly with increasing level of DFWP inclusion. During the 4 to 8 week period, greater body weight gains were recorded for the birds on the 5% DFWP inclusion level than for the control (p<0.05). During 8 to16 weeks, the feed intake and FCR increased linearly (p<0.05). Interestingly too, results of the carcass analysis showed that DFWP inclusion up to 20% in the diet significantly decreased the relative abdominal fat weight but increased the relative proventriculus and gizzard weights of the birds. However, other carcass parameters, meat quality and sensory scores were not significantly influenced by the dietary DFWP inclusion levels (p>0.05). Higher serum aspartate aminotransferase, -glutamyltransferase activity and crude protein digestibility, and lower gross energy digestibility were observed in the 20% DFWP group compared to the control (p<0.05). Dietary DFWP inclusion was inappropriate during the 0 to 4 week period. During 4 to 8 weeks, there was no adverse effect on chicken performance in the 20% group. There was no disadvantage on carcass properties and in the meat panel test. This result would not affect consumer determination.
 Keywords
Dehydrated Food Waste Products;Taiwan Native Chicken;Growth Performance;Carcass Traits;Meat Quality;Nutrient Digestibility;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effects of Free-range Farming on Carcass and Meat Qualities of Black-feathered Taiwan Native Chicken,;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 8, pp.1201-1206 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
AOAC. 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia.

2.
Chae, B. J., S. C. Choi, Y. G. Kim and K. S. Sohn. 2000. Effects of feeding dried food waste on growth and nutrient digestibility in growing-finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1304-1308.

3.
Chen, Y. S. and W. S. Chen. 1995. Colloquium the problem of swill-fed swine. Taiwan Agric. 31:23-27.

4.
Cho, Y. M., G. W. Lee, J. S. Jang, I. S. Shin, K. H. Myung, K. S. Choi, I. H. Bae and C. J. Yang. 2004a. Effects of feeding dried leftover food on growth and body composition of broiler chicks. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:386-393.

5.
Cho, Y. M., I. S. Shin and C. J. Yang. 2004b. Effects of feeding dried leftover food on productivity of laying hens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:518-522.

6.
EPA. 2003. Environmental protection annual of Taiwan. Environmental protection agency. Taipei. Taiwan.

7.
Farhat, A., L. Normand, E. R. Chavez and S. P. Touchburn. 1998. Nutrient digestibility in food waste ingredients for Pekin and Muscovy ducks. Poult. Sci. 77:1371-1376.

8.
Farhat, A., L. Normand, E. R.Chavez and S. P. Touchburn. 2001. Comparison of growth performance, carcass yield and composition, and fatty acid profiles of Pekin and Muscovy ducklings fed diets based on food wastes. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 81:107-114. crossref(new window)

9.
FDA. 2004. Food and Drug Regulations. The department of justice Canada, Canada.

10.
Florene, G., C. Touraille, A. Oual, M. Renvere and G. Moni. 1994. Relationships between postmortem pH changes and some traits of sensory quality in veal. Meat Sci. 73:315-325.

11.
Janssen, W. M. M. A. and B. Carr'e. 1989. Influence of fiber on digestibility of poultry feed. In Recent Developments in Poultry Nutrition (Ed. D. J. A. Cole and W. Haresign). Butterworths press, London, pp. 78-93.

12.
Lin, S. T. 1996. Effects of food waste feeding on swine. Taiwan Agric. 32:73-86.

13.
Longstaff, M. and J. M. Mc Nab. 1991. The inhibitory effect of hull polysaccharides and tannins of field beans (Vicia faba L.) on the digestion of amino acid, starch and lipid and on digestive enzyme activities in young chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 65:199-216. crossref(new window)

14.
Lyon, C. E., B. G. Lyon, C. E. Davis and W. E. Townsend. 1980. Texture profile analysis of patties made from mixed and flakecut mechanically deboned poultry meat. Poult. Sci. 59:69-76.

15.
Moon, J. S., I. K. Kwon and B. J. Chae. 2004. Effects of feeding of diets with or without food waste on growth performance and carcass characteristics in finishing pigs. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:504-510.

16.
Mraz, F. R., R. V. Boucher and M. G. McCartney. 1956. The influence of dietary productive energy and fiber on growth response in chickens. Poult. Sci. 35:1335-1340.

17.
Myer, R. O., J. H. Brendemuhl and D. D. Johnson. 1999. Evaluation of dehydrated restaurant food waste products as feedstuffs for finishing pig. J. Anim. Sci. 77:685-692.

18.
Rivas, M. E., J. H. Brendemuhl, R. O. Myer and D. D. Johnson. 1995. Chemical composition and digestibility of dehydrated edible restaurant waste (DERW) as a feedstuff for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 73(Supp. 1):177(Abstr.).

19.
SAS Institute Inc. 1989. SAS/STAT. User's Guide: Version 6. 4th edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

20.
Scheideler, S. E., D. Aroni and U. Puthpongsiripron. 1998. Strain, fiber source, and enzyme supplementation effects on pullet growth, nutrient utilization, gut morphology, and subsequent layer performance. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7:359-371.

21.
Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, New York.

22.
Su, C. J., J. C. Hsu and B. Yu. 1996. Effects of dietary crude fiber levels on nutrient utilization of diets in goslings II. Utilization of dry matter, crude fat, gross energy, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci. 25:129-137.

23.
Wang, C. H. 1992. Plasma and tissue enzyme activities young chickens. J. Chin. Soc. Vet. Sci. 18:132-138.

24.
Westendorf, M. L., Z. C. Dong and P. A. Schoknecht. 1998. Recycled cafeteria food waste as a feed for swine: nutrient content, digestibility, growth and meat quality. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2976-298.

25.
Williams, C. H., D. J. David and O. Iisma. 1962. The determination of chromic oxide in feces samples by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. J. Agric. Sci. 59:381-385. crossref(new window)