JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Relative Performance and Immune Response in White Leghorn Layers Fed Liquid DL-methionine Hydroxy Analogue and DL-methionine
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Relative Performance and Immune Response in White Leghorn Layers Fed Liquid DL-methionine Hydroxy Analogue and DL-methionine
Panda, A.K.; Rama Rao, S.V.; Raju, M.V.L.N.; Bhanja, S.K.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The relative performance and immune response was evaluated in White Leghorn layers fed liquid DL-methionine hydroxyl analogue-free acid (MHA-FA) relative to dry DL-methionine (DLM) in maize-soybean-sunflower based diets. Three graded levels of methionine (Met) from DLM or MHA-FA were added to the basal diet containing 0.27% Met on an equimolar basis to achieve 0.30, 0.36 and 0.42% Met in the diet. Each diet was fed ad libitum to 25 replicates of one bird (individual feeding) each, from 24 to 40 weeks of age. A regime of 16 h light was provided and all the layers were kept under uniform management throughout the experimental period. None of the parameters studied were influenced by the interaction between source and level of Met in diets. Similarly, the majority of parameters, except for daily feed consumption and immune response (influenced by level) and egg specific gravity and shell thickness (influenced by source), were not affected by either source or level of Met in the diets. Feed consumption was significantly lower in the birds fed a diet containing 0.42% Met compared to those fed lower levels of Met. The cutaneous basophilic hypersensitivity response to PHA-P and antibody titre (32 and 40 wk) to inoculation of sheep red blood cells increased significantly by increasing the concentration of Met in the diet from 0.30 to 0.36%. Thus, the Met requirement for immune competence was higher than for optimum production. The source of Met significantly influenced the egg specific gravity and shell thickness. The specific gravity and shell thickness of eggs increased significantly when MHA-FA was used as the source of Met in the diet compared to DLM. From the study it is concluded that Met requirement for immune competence (360 mg/b/d) is higher than for optimum production (300 mg/b/d). MHA-FA was comparable with DLM as a source of Met for production performance and immunity, when the bioavailability of MHA-FA was considered as 88% of DLM. Further, MHA-FA improved egg shell quality compared to DLM.
 Keywords
Performance;Immune Response;DL-methionine;DL-methionine Hydroxy Analogue Free Acid;White Leghorn Layer;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Virginia, USA.

2.
Corrier, D. E. and J. R. DeLoach. 1990. Evaluation of cell mediated cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity in young chickens by an inter digital skin test. Poult. Sci. 69:403-408.

3.
Danner, E. E. and W. Bessei. 2002. Effectiveness of liquid DL-methionine hydroxy analogue-free acid (DL-MHA-FA) compared to DL-methionine on performance of laying hens. Archives Gefluegel. 66:97-101.

4.
Dibner, J. J. 2003. A review of the metabolism of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid. World's Poult. Sci. J. 59:99-110. crossref(new window)

5.
Duncan, D. B. 1995 Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometr. 11:1-42.

6.
Han, Y., F. Castanon, C. M. Parsons and D. M. Baker. 1990. Absorption and bioavailability of DL-methionine hydroxy analog compared to DL-methionine. Poult. Sci. 69:281-287.

7.
Harms, R. H. and G. B. Russell. 1994. A comparison of the bioavailability of dl-methionine and methionine hydroxyl analogue acid for the commercial laying hen. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 3:1-6.

8.
Kidd, M. T. 2004. Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers. Poult. Sci. 86:650-657.

9.
Knight, C. D. and J. J. Dibner. 1986. Comparative absorption of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio) butanoic acid and L-methionine in the broiler chick. J. Nutr. 114:2179-2186.

10.
Latshaw, J. D. 1991. Nutrition-Mechansim of immunosupression. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 30:111-120. crossref(new window)

11.
Liu, Z., M. M. Bryant and D. A. Roland. 2004a. Bioavailability estimation of DL-Methionine hydroxy analogue relative to DL-methionine in layers fed Milo-soybean diets using different regression models. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 13:461-467.

12.
Liu, Z., A. Bateman, M. Bryant, A. Abebe and D. Ronald. 2004b. Estimation of bioavailability of DL-methionine hydroxy analogue relative to DL-methionine in layers with exponential and slop-ratio models. Poult. Sci. 83:1580-1586.

13.
Liu, Z., A. Bateman, M. Bryant, B. Zinner and D. Ronald. 2005. Performance comparisons between DL-methionine and DL-methionine hydroxyl analogue in layers on an unequal molar basis. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 14:569-575.

14.
Lohakare, J. D., J. Y. Choi, J. K. Kim, J. S. Yons, Y. J. Shim, T. W. Hahn and B. J. Chae. 2005. Effects of dietary combination of vitamin A, E and methionine in growth performance, meat quality and immunity in commercial broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:516-523.

15.
Mandal, A. B., A. V. Elangovan and T. S. Johri. 2004. Comparing Bio-efficacy of Liquid DL-methionine Hydroxy Analogue Free acid with DL-methionine in Broiler Chickens. Asian-Aust. J Anim. Sci. 17:102-108.

16.
NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of Poultry. 9th Revised Edition, National Research Council, USA.

17.
Panda, A. K., S. V. Rama Rao, M. V. L. N. Raju, G. Shyam Sunder and S. R. Sharma. 2005. Performance of commercial layers fed diets with various levels of methionine. Indian J. Anim. Nutr. 22(4):229-232.

18.
Rama Rao, S. V., N. K. Praharaj, M. R. Reddy and A. K. Panda. 2003. G$\times$E interaction between genotype and dietary levels of methionine for immune function in commercial broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:104-112. crossref(new window)

19.
Rama Rao, S. V., M. V. L. N. Raju, A. K. Panda and M. R. Reddy. 2006. Sunflower meal as a substitute for soybean meal in commercial broiler chicken diets. Br. Poult. Sci. (in press).

20.
Richards, J. D., C. A. Atwell, M. Vaquez-Anon and J. J. Dibner. 2005. Comparative in vitro and in vivo absorption of 2-hydroxy-4methylthio butanoic acid and methionine in the broiler chicken. Poult. Sci. 84:1397-1405.

21.
Scott, M. L., M. C. Nesheim and R. J. Young. 1982. Nutrition of the Chicken. 3rd edn. Ithaca, New York

22.
Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH Publishing Company, New Delhi.

23.
Swain, B. K. and T. S. Johri. 2000. Effect of supplemental methionine, choline and their combinations on the performance and immune response of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:83-88. crossref(new window)

24.
Tasaigbe, V. K., M. E. Cook, A. E. Harper and M. L. Sunde. 1987. Enhanced immune responses in broiler chicks fed methionine-supplemented diets. Poult. Sci. 66:1147-1154.

25.
Vazquez-Anon, M., D. Kratzer, R. Gonzalez-Esquerra, I. G. Yi and C. D. Kinght. 2006. A multiple regression model approach to contrast the performance of 2-Hydroxy-4-Methylthio butanoic acid and DL-Methionine supplementation tested in broiler experiments and reported in the literature. Poult. Sci. 85:693-705.

26.
Wegmann, T. G. and O. Smithies. 1966. A simple hemagglutination system requiring small amounts of red cells and antibodies. Transfusion. 6:67-73. crossref(new window)