JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Restriction of Metabolizable Energy in Broiler Growers and Its Impact on Grower and Breeder Performance
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Restriction of Metabolizable Energy in Broiler Growers and Its Impact on Grower and Breeder Performance
Sunder, G. Skyam; Kumar, Ch. Vijaya; Panda, A.K.; Raju, M.V.L.N.; Rao, S.V. Rama; Gopinath, N.C.S.; Reddy, M.R.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Metabolizable energy (ME) required for basal metabolism, activity and growth was considered as the criterion for targeting specific increases in body weight (100 g/week) of broiler chicks during the grower phase (5-20 weeks) and its impact was evaluated on breeder performance. Broiler female chicks (460) from a synthetic dam line were randomly distributed to 4 test groups with 23 replicates of 5 birds each and housed in cages. The first group (ME-100) was offered a calculated amount of ME by providing a measured quantity of grower diet (160 g protein and 2,600 kcal ME/kg) which increased with age and weight gain (133-294 kcal/bird/day). The other three groups were offered 10 or 20% less ME (ME-90 and ME-80, respectively) and 10% excess ME (ME-110) over the control group (ME-100). From 21 weeks of age, a single breeder diet (170 g protein and 2,600 kcal ME/kg) was uniformly fed to all groups and the impact of grower ME restriction on breeder performance evaluated up to 58 weeks. The targeted body weight gain of 1,600 g in a 16-week period was achieved by pullets of the ME-100 group almost one week earlier by gaining 8.7 g more weight per week. However, pullets in the ME-90 group gained 1,571 g during the same period, which was closer to the targeted weight. At 20 weeks of age, the conversion efficiency of feed (5.21-5.37), ME (13.9-14.1 kcal/g weight gain) and protein (0.847-0.871 g/g weight gain), eviscerated meat yield, giblet and tibia weights were not influenced by ME restriction, but the weights of abdominal fat and liver were higher with increased ME intake. Reduction of ME by 10% in the grower period significantly delayed sexual maturity (169.3 d), but increased egg production (152.5 /bird) with better persistency. Improved conversion efficiency of feed, ME and protein per g egg content were also observed in this group up to 56 weeks. The fertility and hatchability at 58 weeks of age were higher in the ME-90 group compared to the control and 10% excess ME feeding. In conclusion, the present study revealed the possibility of achieving targeted weight gain in broiler growers by feeding measured quantities of ME during the rearing period with consequential benefits in breeder performance.
 Keywords
Metabolizable Energy;Restriction;Broiler Growers;Breeder Performance;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effects of Dietary Metabolizable Energy and Lysine on CarcassCharacteristics and Meat Quality in Arbor Acres Broilers,;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2007. vol.20. 12, pp.1865-1873 crossref(new window)
2.
Effect of Measured Energy Restriction and Age Intervals on Growth, Nutrient Digestibility, Carcass Parameters, Bone Characteristics and Stress in Broiler Breeders during the Rearing Period,;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2008. vol.21. 7, pp.1038-1047 crossref(new window)
3.
Nutritional Evaluation of Full-fat Sunflower Seed for Broiler Chickens,;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2009. vol.22. 4, pp.557-564 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Association of Official Analytical Chemist. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis, 16th ed. (Washington, DC, AOAC).

2.
Bokkers, E. A. M. and P. Koene. 2003. Eating behavior, and preprandial and postprandial correlation in male broilers and layer chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:538-544. crossref(new window)

3.
Bennett, C. D. and S. Lesson. 1990. Body composition of the broiler-breeder pullet. Poult. Sci. 69:715-720.

4.
Brake, J., J. D. Garlich and E. D. Peebles. 1985. Effect of protein and energy intake by broiler breeders during the pre-breeder transition period on subsequent reproductive performance. Poult. Sci. 64:2335-2340.

5.
Bowmaker, J. E. E. and R. M. Gous. 1989. Quantification of reproductive changes and nutrient requirements of broiler breeder pullets at sexual maturity. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:663-675. crossref(new window)

6.
Denbow, D. M. 1994. Appetite and its control. Poult. Sci. Rev. 5:209-229.

7.
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics, 11:1-42. crossref(new window)

8.
Goerzen, P. R., W. L. Julsrud and F. E. Robinson. 1996. Duration of fertility in ad libitum and feed- restricted caged broiler breeders. Poult. Sci. 75:962-965.

9.
Hocking, P. M. 1993. Welfare of broiler breeder and layer females subjected to food and water control during rearing: Quantifying the degree of restriction. Br. Poult. Sci. 34:53-64. crossref(new window)

10.
Hocking, P. M. and C. C. Whitehead. 1990. Relationships between body composition, ovarian structure and reproduction in nature females of genetically lean or fat broilers given different food allowances. Br. Poult. Sci. 31:319-330. crossref(new window)

11.
Hocking, P. M., R. Bernard and G. W. Robertson. 2002. Effects of low dietary protein and different allocations of food during rearing and restricted feeding after peak rate of lay on egg production, fertility and hatchability in female broiler breeders. Br. Poult. Sci. 43:94-103. crossref(new window)

12.
Hocking, P. M., D. Waddington, M. A. Walker and A. B. Gilbert. 1989. Control of the development of the ovarian follicular hierarchy in broiler breeder pullets by food restriction during rearing. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:161-174. crossref(new window)

13.
Hudson, H. A., J. L. Wilson, G. N. Rowland, R. J. Buhr and W. M. Britton. 1999. Feed restriction affects bone properties of the broiler breeder pullet femur. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 8:400-407.

14.
Katanbaf, M. N., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1989a. Restricted feeding in early and late-feeding chickens. 1. Growth and physiological responses. Poult. Sci. 68:344-351.

15.
Katanbaf, M. N., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1989b. Restricted feeding in early and Late-Feathering Chickens. 2. Reproductive Response. Poult. Sci. 68:352-358.

16.
Katanbaf, M. N., E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1989c. Restricted feeding in early and late-feathering chickens.3.Organ size and carcass composition. Poult. Sci. 68:359-368.

17.
Lopez, G. and S. Lesson. 1995. Response of broiler breeders to low-protein diets. Adult breeder performance. Poult. Sci. 74:685-695.

18.
Lilburn, M. S. and D. J. Myers-Miller. 1990. Dietary effects on body composition and subsequent production characteristics in broiler breeder hens. Poult. Sci. 69:1126-1132.

19.
Neuman, S. L., R. H. Harms and G. B. Russell. 1998. An innovative change in energy restriction for broiler breeder hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7:328-335.

20.
Nir, I., Z. Nitsan, E. A. Dunnington and P. B. Siegel. 1996. Aspects of food intake restriction in young domestic fowl: metabolic and genetic considerations. World's Poult. Sci. J. 52:251-266. crossref(new window)

21.
Pinchasov, Y. and D. Galili. 1990. Energy requirement of feedrestricted broiler breeder pullets. Poult. Sci. 69:1792-1795.

22.
Renema, R. A. and F. E. Robinson. 2004. Defining normal: comparison of feed restriction and full feeding of female broiler breeders. World's Poult. Sci. J. 60:508-522. crossref(new window)

23.
Renema, R. A., F. E. Robinson, M. Newcomb and R. I. Mckay. 1999a. Effects of body weight and feed allocation during sexual maturation in broiler breeder hens, 1. Growth and carcass characteristics. Poult. Sci. 78:619-628.

24.
Renema, R. A., F. E. Robinson, J. A. Proudman, M. Newcomb and R. I. Mckay. 1999b. Effects of body weight and feed allocation during sexual maturation in broiler breeder hens. 2. Ovarian morphology and plasma hormone profiles. Poult. Sci. 78:629-639.

25.
Richards, M. P. 2003. Genetic regulation of feed intake and energy balance in poultry. Poult. Sci. 82:907-916.

26.
Robinson, F. E., N. A. Robinson and T. A. Scott. 1991. Reproductive performance, growth and body composition of full-fed versus feed restricted broiler breeder hens. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 71:549-556. crossref(new window)

27.
Robinson, F. E., N. A. Robinson and R. T. Hardin. 1995. The effects of 20-week body weight and feed allocation during early lay on female broiler breeders. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 4:203-210.

28.
Robinson, F. E., J. L. Wilson, M. W. Yu, G. M. Fasenko and T. Hardin 1993. The relationship between body weight and reproductive efficiency in meat-type chickens. Poult. Sci. 72:912-922.

29.
SAS Institute. 1994. SAS User's Guide, Version 6.12 SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

30.
Scott, M. L., M. C. Nesheim and R. J. Young. 1982. Energy chapter II. Nutrition of the chicken. pp. 7-57. (M. L. Scott and Associates, Publishers Ithaca, New York).

31.
Whitehead, C. C. 2000. Nutrition: the integrative science. Br. Poult. Sci. 41:5-15.

32.
Yu, M. W., F. E. Robinson and A. R. Rubble. 1992a. Effect of feed allowance during rearing and breeding of female broiler breeders. 1.Growth and carcass characteristics. Poult. Sci. 71:1739-1749.

33.
Yu, M. W., F. E. Robinson and R. J. Etches. 1992b. Effect of feed allowance during rearing and breeding on female broiler breeders.3.Ovarian steroid genesis. Poult. Sci. 71:1762-1767.