Drew, M. D., A. G. van Kessel and D. D. Maenz. 2003. Absorption of methionine and 2-hydroxy-4-methylthiobutanoic acid in conventional and germ-free chickens. Poult. Sci. 82:1149-1153.
Esteve-Garcia, E. 1988. Digestion and excretion of methionine sources for poultry. PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.
Esteve-Garcia, E. and R. E. Austic. 1993. Intestinal absorption and renal excretion of dietary methionine sources by the growing chicken. J. Nutr. Biochem. 4:576-587.
Hoehler, D. 2006. Letter to the editor: No evidence for different dose responses of commercial methionine sources in broilers. Poult. Sci. 85:2047.
Hoehler, D. 2007. Letter to the editor (Letter): A misleading approach to determine the methionine activity of organic trace minerals. Poult. Sci. 86:1611-1612.
Jansman, A. J. M., C. A. Kan and J. Wiebenga. 2003. Comparison of the biological efficacy of DL-methionine and hydroxy-4- methylthiobutanoic acid (HMB) in pigs and poultry. CVB documentation report Nr. 29, Centraal Veevoederbureau, Lelystad, The Netherlands.
Kratzer, D. D. and R. C. Littell. 2006. Appropriate statistical methods to compare dose responses of methionine sources. Poult. Sci. 85:947-954.
Lemme, A., D. Hoehler, J. J. Brennan and P. F. Mannion. 2002. Relative effectiveness of methionine hydroxy analog compared to DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 81:838-845.
Lemme, A. and A. Petri. 2003. The effectiveness of liquid methionine hydroxy analogue relative to DL-methionine - A literature review. AminoNewsTM 4(3):1-10.
Lemme, A. 2004. Relative effectiveness of the methionine hydroxy analogue calcium salt in broilers and layers. AminoNewsTM 5(3):7-12.
Lingens, G. and S. Molnar. 1996. Studies on metabolism of broilers by using 14C-labelled DL-Methionine and DLMethionine hydroxy analogue Ca-salt. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 49:113-124.
Littell, R. A., P. R. Henry, A. J. Lewis and C. B. Ammermann. 1997. Estimation of relative bioavailability of nutrients using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2672-2683.
Mandal, A. B., A. V. Elangovan and T. S. Johri. 2004. Comparing bio-efficacy of liquid DL-methionine hydroxy analogue free acid with DL-methionine in broiler chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:102-108.
Piepho, H.-P. 2006. Letter to the editor: A cautionary note on appropriate statistical methods to compare dose responses of methionine sources. Poult. Sci. 85:1511-1512.
Potter, L. M., G. P. Schmidt, M. E. Blair, J. R. Shelton and B. A. Bliss. 1984. MHAC versus DL-methionine-Part I: The methionine controversy. Animal Nutrition and Health (March- April):14-17.
Richards, J. D., J. J. Dibner and C. D. Knight. 2007. Letters to the editor (Reply): DL-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid from any commercial source is fully available as a source of methionine activity. Poult. Sci. 86:1613-1614.
SAS Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 9.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
Sauer, N., K. Emrich, H. P. Piepho, A. Lemme, M. S. Redshaw and R. Mosenthin. 2007. Meta-analysis on the relative efficiency of methionine-hydroxy-analogue-free-acid compared with DL-methionine in broilers using non-linear mixed models. Poult. Sci. (In press). (partly published in: Sauer, N., K. Emrich, H. P. Piepho, A. Lemme, M. S. Redshaw and R. Mosenthin. 2007. Meta-analysis on the relative efficiency of the liquid hydroxy analogue compared with DL-methionine in broilers using multi-exponential regression. 16th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, August 27-30, Strasbourg, France: 4).
Vazquez-Anon, M., D. Kratzer, R. Gonzelez-Esquerra, I. G. Yi and C. D. Knight. 2006. A multiple regression model approach to contrast the performance of 2-hydroxy-4-methylthio butanoic acid and DL-methionine supplementation tested in broiler experiments and reported in the literature. Poult. Sci. 85:693- 705.
Yi, G. F., C. A. Atwell, J. A. Hume, J. J. Dibner, C. D. Knight and J. D. Richards. 2007. Determining the methionine activity of Mintrex organic trace minerals in broiler chicks by using radiolabel tracing or growth assay. Poult. Sci. 86:877-887.