Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Nipple Angle on Water Disappearance by Pigs
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Nipple Angle on Water Disappearance by Pigs
Yun, M.S.; Ju, W.S.; Piao, L.G.; Long, H.F.; Kil, D.Y.; Oh, H.K.; Kim, Y.Y.;
  PDF(new window)
This experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of different nipple angles on water disappearance in growing pigs, which is defined as the water which leaves the watering device but is not consumed by the pig. This water adds to the volume of the total waste slurry. Four crossbred pigs averaging kg were assigned into 1 of 4 treatments using a Latin-square design. Treatments were distinguished by the angle between nipple terminal and the perpendicular wall. These angles were: 1) NA-30 (= Nipple Angle ), 2) NA-45 (= Nipple Angle ), 3) NA-60 (= Nipple Angle ) and 4) NA-90 (= Nipple Angle ). All of the nipples were fixed at shoulder height of each pig. After a 7-day adaptation period, samples were collected from each pig for 4 days, followed by a day for change-over. Pigs were fed a 0.8 kg diet twice daily at 08:00 and 20:00 and supplied water ad libitum. Throughout the experimental period, pigs in the NA-30 treatment group showed greater water disappearance than other treatments. Water disappearance was the lowest for the NA-60 treatment group (p<0.01). The percentage of water disappearance to the water supply was significantly reduced in the NA-60 treatment group (p<0.01). Water intake was the same for all the treatment groups. The rate of water disappearance per unit of water intake was significantly decreased in pigs in the NA-60 treatment group compared to other groups (p<0.01). These results suggested that the nipple angle for growing pigs should be to reduce water disappearance and, subsequently, the amount of waste generated.
Nipple Angle;Water Disappearance;Livestock Waste;
 Cited by
Brooks, P. H. 1994. Water-Forgotten nutrient and novel delivery system. In: Biotechnology in the Feed Industry. Nottingham Press. pp. 211-234.

Cumby, T. R. 1986. Design requirements of liquid feeding systems for pigs: A review. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 34:153-172. crossref(new window)

DGH Engineering Ltd. 2001. Water consumption and waste production during different production stages in hog operations. St. Andrews. Manitoba.

Dong, G. Z. and J. R. Pluske. 2007. The low feed intake in newlyweaned pigs : problems and possible solutions. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:440-452.

Gill, B. P. and J. Barber. 1990. Water delivery systems for growing pigs. Farm Building Progress. 102:19-22.

Gongyou, N. 1996. Water use and drinker management -a review, Prairie Swine Centre Research Report. Saskatoon. Saskatchewan.

Pedersen, B. K. 1987. Evaluation of lund-10 and biscoe-A1 bite drinkers for weaners. Meddelelse nr. 123 fra Den rullende Afprovning, Landsudvalget for Svin. Danske Slagterier.

Pedersen, B. K. 1999. Water intake and pig performance. Personal communication. The Federation of Danish Pig Producers and slaughterhouses. Copenhagen. Denmark.

Phillips, P. A. and D. Fraser. 1990. Water bowl size for newborn pigs. Appl. Engineering in Agric. 6:79-81.

Shim, S. B., J. M. A. J. Verdonk, W. F. Pellikaan and M. W. A. Verstegen. 2007. Differences in microbial activities of faeces from weaned and unweaned pigs in relation to in vitro fermentation of different sources of inulin-type oligfructose and pig feed ingredients. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1444- 1452.

Yang, T. S. 2007. Environmental sustainability and social desirability issues in pig feeding. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:605-614.

Yu, I. T., J. J. Su, J. F. Wu, S. L. Lee, C. C. Ju and H. T. Yen. 2005. Dietary modification for reducing electrical conductivity of piggery wastewater. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1343-1347.