JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Motility, Acrosome, Viability and ATP of Boar Sperm with or without Cold Shock Resistance in Liquid Semen at 17℃ and 4℃, and Frozen-thawed Semen
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Motility, Acrosome, Viability and ATP of Boar Sperm with or without Cold Shock Resistance in Liquid Semen at 17℃ and 4℃, and Frozen-thawed Semen
Yi, Y.J.; Li, Z.H.; Kim, E.S.; Song, E.S.; Kim, H.B.; Cong, P.Q.; Lee, J.M.; Park, Chang-Sik;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This study was designed to analyze boar sperm to compare motility, acrosome morphology, viability and ATP by various preservation methods between Duroc boar A with cold shock resistance sperm and Duroc boar B with cold shock sensitivity sperm. Semen volume, sperm concentration, motility and normal acrosome between Duroc boar A and B did not show any differences within 2 h after collection. There were no differences in sperm motility and normal acrosome between boar A and B at 1 day of preservation at and , respectively. However, sperm motility and normal acrosome from 2 day of preservation at and , respectively, were higher for boar A than boar B. The frozen-thawed sperm motility and normal acrosome were higher for boar A than boar B. The sperm viability and ATP concentration according to storage period of liquid semen at and were higher for boar A than boar B. Also, the sperm viability and ATP concentration of frozen-thawed semen were higher for boar A than boar B. In conclusion, we found out that the original quality of boar semen with cold shock resistance sperm played an important role.
 Keywords
Boar;Liquid Semen;Motility;Acrosome;ATP;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Comparison of Viability, ATP and In vitro Fertilization of Boar Sperm Stored at 4℃ in the Three Different Diluents,;;;;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2008. vol.21. 8, pp.1127-1133 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Aalbers, G. J., L. A. Johnson, E. A. Aalbers-Smit and J. H. M. Rademaker. 1985. ATP content of fresh and frozen-thawed boar semen and its relationship to sperm concentration and fertility. In: Deep freezing of boar semen (Ed. L. A. Johnson and K. Larsson), Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Uppsala, pp. 259-264.

2.
Andersen, K. 1974. Morphological abonormalities in the acrosome and nucleus of boar spermatozoa. Nord. Vet. Med. 26:215-218.

3.
Bane, A. 1961. Acrosomal abnormality associated with sterility in boar. In: IVth International Congress of Animal Reproduction, Hague, The Netherlands, 4:810-817.

4.
Bredderman, P. J. and R. H. Foote. 1971. Factors stabilizing bull sperm cell volume and prolonging motility at high dilution. Exp. Cell Res. 66:458-464. crossref(new window)

5.
De Ambrogi, M., J. Ballester, F. Saravia, I. Caballero, A. Johannisson, M. Wallgren, M. Andersson and H. Rodriguez-Martinez. 2006. Effect of storage in short- and long-term commercial semen extenders on the motility, plasma membrane and chromatin integrity of boar spermatozoa. Int. J. Androl. 29(5):543-552. crossref(new window)

6.
Fawcett, D. W. 1975. The mammalian spermatozoon. Dev. Biol. 44:394-436. crossref(new window)

7.
Ford, S. R. and F. R. Leach. 1998. Bioluminescent assay of the adenylate energy charge. Methods Mol. Biol. 102:69-81.

8.
Foulkes, J. A. and B. J. MacDonald. 1979. The relationship between ATP content and motility of bovine spermatozoa. Theriogenol. 11:313-319. crossref(new window)

9.
Garner, D. L., L. A. Johnson, S. T. Yue, B. L. Roth and R. P. Haugland. 1994. Dual DNA staining assessment of bovine sperm viability using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. J. Androl. 16:620-629.

10.
Garner, D. L. and L. A. Johnson. 1995. Viability assessment of mammalian sperm using SYBR-14 and propidium iodide. Biol. Reprod. 53:276-284. crossref(new window)

11.
Guminska, M., T. Kedryna, A. Laszcska, M. Godlewski and B. Szczesniak-Fabianczyk. 1997. Changes in ATP level and iron-induced ultra-weak photon emission in bull spermatozoa, caused by membrane peroxidation during thermal stress. Acta Biochim. Pol. 44:131-138.

12.
Jeulin, C. and J-C. Soufir. 1992. Reversible intracellular ATP changes in intact rat spermatozoa and effects on flagellar sperm movement. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 21:201-222.

13.
Johnson, L. A., J. G. Aalbers, C. M. T. Willems and W. Sybesma. 1981. Use of boar spermatozoa for artificial insemination. I. Fertilizing capacity of fresh and frozen spermatozoa in sows on 36 farms. J. Anim. Sci. 52:1130-1136.

14.
Johnson, L. A., K. F. Weitze, P. Fiser and W. M. C. Maxwell. 2000. Storage of boar semen. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 62:143-172. crossref(new window)

15.
Kahn, W. 1981. Zur ATP- und AMP-Bestimmung mit dem Biolumineszenzverfahren im Sperma einiger Haustiere und des Menschen. Vet. Med. Diss. Munchen.

16.
Krider, J. L., J. H. Conrad and W. E. Carroll. 1982. Swine Production. New York: McGraw-Hill Publications, pp. 179-182.

17.
Mendeluk, G. R., M. J. Munuce, C. Carizza, M. Sardi and C. Bregni. 1997. Sperm motility and ATP content in seminal byperviscosity. Arch Androl. 39:223-227. crossref(new window)

18.
Mujica, A., L. Neri-Bazan, J. S. Tash and S. Uribe. 1994. Mechanism for procaine mediated hyperactivated motility in guinea pig spermatozoa. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 38:285-292. crossref(new window)

19.
Oh, S. H., M. T. See, T. E. Long and J. M. Galvin. 2006. Estimates of genetic correlations between production and semen traits in boar. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19(2):160-164.

20.
Park, C. S., M. Y. Kim, Y. J. Yi, Y. J. Chang, S. H. Lee, J. J. Lee, M. C. Kim and D. I. Jin. 2004. Liquid boar sperm quality during storage, and in vitro fertilization and culture of pig oocytes. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(10):1369-1373.

21.
Paquignon, M., J. Bussiere, F. Bariteau and M. Courot. 1980. Effectiveness of frozen boar semen under practical conditions of artificial insemination. Theriogenol. 14:217-226. crossref(new window)

22.
Phillips, D. M. 1977. Mitochondrial disposition in mammalian spermatozoa. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 2:144-154.

23.
Pursel, V. G. and L. A. Johnson. 1971. Procedure for the preservation of boar spermatozoa by freezing. US Dept. Agric. ARS, pp. 44-227.

24.
Pursel, V. G., L. A. Johnson and G. B. Rampacek. 1972a. Acrosome morphology of boar spermatozoa incubated before cold shock. J. Anim. Sci. 34:278-283.

25.
Pursel, V. G., L. A. Johnson and L. L. Schulman. 1972b. Loss of boar sperm fertilizing capacity associated with altered acrosome morphology during in vitro storage. In: VIIth International Congress Animal Reproduction and AI, Munich, Germany, II, pp. 1525-1600.

26.
Pursel, V. G. and L. A. Johnson. 1975. Freezing of boar spermatozoa: fertilizing capacity with concentrated semen and a new thawing procedure. J. Anim. Sci. 40:99-102.

27.
Pursel, V. G. and C. S. Park. 1985. Freezing and thawing procedures for boar spermatozoa. In: (Ed. L. A. Johnson and K. Lasson), Deep Freezing of Boar Semen. Uppsala, Sweden, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, pp. 147-166.

28.
Schuler, D., U. Kupfer and F. Zimmerman. 1979. Deep freezing of boar semen: A comparison of two freezing methods. Schweiz Arch Tierheilk 121:173-178.

29.
Velez Cuevas, G. 1982. Untersuchungen uber die Eignung des ATP- ADP- und AMP-Nachweises mit der Biolumineszenz-methode zur Bullen-spermien. Vet. Med. Diss. Munchen.

30.
Westendorf, P., L. Richter and H. Treu. 1975. Zur Tiefgerierung von Ebersperma Labor- und Besamungsergebnisse mit dem Husenberger Pailletten-Verfahren. Dtsch. Tierarztl. Wschr. 82:261-300.

31.
Yi, Y. J., Y. A. Kwon, H. J. Ko and C. S. Park. 2002. Effects of diluent component, freezing rate, thawing time and thawing temperature on acrosome morphology and motility of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15(11):1553-1558.