JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Genetic Parameters and Annual Trends for Birth and Weaning Weights of a Northeastern Thai Indigenous Cattle Line
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Genetic Parameters and Annual Trends for Birth and Weaning Weights of a Northeastern Thai Indigenous Cattle Line
Intaratham, W.; Koonawootrittriron, S.; Sopannarath, P.; Graser, H.-U.; Tumwasorn, S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Records of a Northeastern Thai indigenous cattle line population were used to estimate genetic parameters and annual trends for calf weights. The data set comprised records of 1,922 and 1,489 animals for birth and weaning weight, respectively born from 1993 to 2004. A bivariate analysis was carried out for variance and covariance components estimations using average information restricted maximum likelihood procedure. Average estimated breeding value and maternal breeding value of the animals born in 1993 were set to zero as a base group. Genetic trends of each trait were calculated by regressing average estimated breeding values and maternal breeding values on birth year of calves. Phenotypic trends for each trait were calculated by regressing the yearly adjusted weight on birth year of calves. The results revealed that the estimate of direct heritability, maternal heritability and maternal permanent environmental variance as a proportion of phenotypic variance for birth and weaning weight was 0.40, 0.14 and 0.04; 0.27, 0.05 and 0.23, respectively. Direct heritability was moderately heritable and genetic improvement through selection can be achieved. The estimate of phenotypic, direct genetic, maternal genetic and maternal permanent environmental correlation between birth and weaning weight was 0.48, 0.65, 0.98 and 0.73, respectively. The phenotypic trend, genetic trends of estimated breeding value and maternal breeding value for birth weight was 0.18, 0.04 and 0.01 kg/year, respectively. The phenotypic trend, genetic trends of estimated breeding value and maternal breeding value for weaning weight was -1.36, 0.32 and 0.03 kg/year, respectively. As maternal genetic effect was considerably less important than direct genetic effect, selection for improved weaning weight of this Northeastern Thai indigenous cattle line can place more emphasis on the direct genetic effect.
 Keywords
Thai Indigenous Cattle;Genetic Parameters;Annual Trends;Calf Weights;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Allen, J. 2002. An overview of BREEDPLAN. In: Development strategies for genetic evaluation for beef production developing countries (Ed. J. Allen and A. Na-Chiangmai). Australia Center for International Agriculture Research, Canberra, Australia. pp. 105-113.

2.
Bennett, G. L. and K. E. Gregory. 1996. Genetic (Co)variances among birth weight, 200 day weight and postweaning gain in composites and parental breeds of beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 74:2598-2611.

3.
Choi, S. B., J. W. Lee, N. S. Kim, S. H. Na, J. F. Keown and L. D. Van Vleck. 2000. Estimation of genetic parameters for direct, maternal and grandmaternal genetic for birth, weaning and six month weights of Hanwoo (Korean cattle). Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:149-154.

4.
Choi, S. B., J. W. Lee, Y. H. Choy, K. J. Na and N. S. Kim. 2005. Estimates of parameters for genetic relationship between reproductive performances and body conditions score of Hanwoo cows. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:909-914.

5.
Department of Livestock Development. 2003. Number of livestock inventory in part of Thailand. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative, Bangkok.

6.
Falconer, D. S. and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Edn. Longman Group Ltd., London.

7.
Garrick, D. J. 1990. Maternal effects on growth in beef cattle. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the Australia Association of Animal Breeding and Genetics. New Zealand. pp. 397-400.

8.
Gilmour, A. R., B. R. Cullis, S. J. Welham and R. Thomson. 2002. ASReml Reference Manual. NSW Agriculture, Orange, Australia.

9.
Haile-Mariam, M. and H. Kass-Merchan. 1995. Estimates of direct and maternal (co)variance components of growth traits in Boran cattle. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 112:43-52. crossref(new window)

10.
Koch, R. M. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding: VI. Maternal effects in beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 35:1316-1323.

11.
Kriese, L. A., J. K. Bertrand and L. L. Benyshek. 1991. Genetic and environmental growth trait parameter estimates for Brahman and Brahman-derivative cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 69:2362-2370.

12.
Meyer, K. 1992. Variance components due to direct and maternal effects for growth traits of Australian beef cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 31:179-204. crossref(new window)

13.
Meyer, K. 1993. Estimates of covariance components for growth traits of Australian Charolais cattle. Aust. J. Agri. Res. 44:1501-1508. crossref(new window)

14.
Meyer, K., M. J. Carrick and B. J. P. Donelly. 1993. Genetic parameter for growth traits of Australian beef cattle from a multibreed selection experiment. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2614-2622.

15.
Robinson, D. L. 1996. Estimation and interpretation of direct and maternal genetic parameters for weights of Australian Angus cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 45:1-11. crossref(new window)

16.
Roughsedge, T., P. R. Amer, R. Thompson and G. Simm. 2005. Genetic parameters for a maternal breeding goal in beef production. J. Anim. Sci. 83:2319-2329.

17.
SAS Institute Inc. 1996. The SAS System for Windows: Release 6.12. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

18.
Willham, R. L. 1972. The role of maternal effects in animal breeding: III. Biometrical aspects of maternal effects in animals. J. Anim. Sci. 35:1288-1293.