JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Growth Performance and Antibody Response of Broiler Chicks Fed Yeast Derived β-Glucan and Single-strain Probiotics
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Growth Performance and Antibody Response of Broiler Chicks Fed Yeast Derived β-Glucan and Single-strain Probiotics
An, B.K.; Cho, B.L.; You, S.J.; Paik, H.D.; Chang, H.I.; Kim, S.W.; Yun, C.W.; Kang, C.W.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
A study was conducted to evaluate the effects of dietary yeast derived -glucan and single-strain probiotics on the growth performance and antibody response in broiler chicks. Six hundred and thirty 1-d-old male broiler chicks were divided into seven groups, placed into three pens per group (30 birds per pen) and fed one of seven non-medicated corn-SBM based experimental diets containing 0.025, 0.05 or 0.1% Saccharomyces cerevisiae -glucan and 0.05, 0.1 or 0.2% Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (BA-pro, ) or devoid of them for 5 wk. The body weight gains in groups fed diets containing 0.025 or 0.1% -glucan, 0.1% or 0.2% BA-pro were significantly higher (p<0.05) than the control over 1-35 d. Feed conversion rates of groups fed -glucan and BA-pro tended to be improved compared to the control group. There were no significant differences in the relative weights of liver, abdominal fat and breast muscle. No significant differences were observed in the activities of serum enzymes and concentrations of various cholesterol fractions. The antibody titers against Newcastle disease or infectious bronchitis virus in the chicks fed diets containing -glucan and BA-pro were significantly higher (p<0.05) than in the control. The concentrations of cecal lactic acid bacteria in all groups fed BA-pro were significantly increased (p<0.05) compared to the control. These results indicated that dietary yeast derived -glucan and BA-pro exerted growth-promoting and immune-enhancing effects in broiler chickens. In addition, BA-pro added to the diets modulated the profiles of cecal microflora, reflecting a potential to be beneficial microorganisms in chickens.
 Keywords
Yeast Derived -Glucan;Single-strain Probiotics;Growth Performance;Antibody Response;Cecal Microflora;Broiler Chickens;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Lower Antibody Response in Chickens Homozygous for the Mx Resistant Allele to Avian Influenza,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 4, pp.465-470 crossref(new window)
2.
Effect of Wood Vinegar on the Performance, Nutrient Digestibility and Intestinal Microflora in Weanling Pigs,;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 2, pp.267-274 crossref(new window)
3.
Effects of Mannan-oligosaccharides and Live Yeast in Diets on the Carcass, Cut Yields, Meat Composition and Colour of Finishing Turkeys,;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2009. vol.22. 4, pp.550-556 crossref(new window)
4.
산란계 사료 내 3종류의 Bacillus subtilis의 첨가가 산란후기 계란 품질과 장내 미생물 및 경골에 미치는 영향,이완섭;이보근;김재영;김지숙;이소연;오성택;안병기;황용배;심승규;김동건;강창원;

Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 2010. vol.52. 5, pp.389-398 crossref(new window)
5.
Comparison of Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Meat Quality of Korean Local Chickens and Silky Fowl,;;;;;;;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014. vol.27. 3, pp.398-405 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
An, B. K., S. Ohtani and K. Tanaka. 1995. Effects of dietary vitamin $B_6$ levels on lipid concentration and fatty acid composition in growing chicks. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 8:627-633.

2.
Chae, B. J., J. D. Lohakare, W. K. Moon, S. L. Lee, Y. H. Park and T. W. Hahn. 2006. Effects of supplementation ${\beta}$-glucan on the growth performance and immunity in broilers. Res. Vet. Sci. 80:291-298. crossref(new window)

3.
Cheng, Y., D. Lee, C. Wen and C. Weng. 2004. Effects of $\beta$-glucan supplementation on lymphocyte proliferation, macrophage chemotaxis and specific immune responses in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17:1145-1149.

4.
Duncan, D. B. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometr. 11:1-42. crossref(new window)

5.
Edens, F. W., C. R. Parkhurst, I. A. Casas and W. J. Dobrogosz. 1997. Priciples of ex ovo competitive exclusion and in ovo administration of Lactobacillus reuteri. Poult. Sci. 76:179-196.

6.
Eicher, S. D., C. A. McKee, J. A. Carroll and E. A. Pajor. 2006. Supplemental vitamin C and yeast cell wall beta-glucan as growth enhancers in newborn pigs and as immunostimulators after an endotoxin challenge after weaning. J. Anim. Sci. 84:2352-2360. crossref(new window)

7.
Fuller, R. 1989. Probiotics in man and animals. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 66:365-378.

8.
Grunewald, K. K. and K. Mitchell. 1983. Serum cholesterols levels in mice fed fermented and unfermented acidophilus milk. J. Food Prot. 46:315-318.

9.
Haghighi, H. R., J. Gong, C. L. Gyles, M. A. Hayes, H. Zhou, B. Sanei, J. R. Chambers and S. Sharif. 2006. Probiotics stimulate production of natural antibodies in chickens. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 13:975-980. crossref(new window)

10.
Hiss, S. and H. Sauerwein. 2003. Influence of dietary ${\beta}$-glucan on growth performance, lymphocyte proliferation, specific immune response and heptoglobulin plasma concentrations in pigs. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 87:2-11. crossref(new window)

11.
Huang, M. K., Y. J. Choi, R. Houde, J. W. Lee, B. Lee and X. Zhao. 2004. Effects of Lactobacilli and Acidophilic fungus on the production performance and immune responses in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 83:788-795.

12.
Huff, G. R., W. E. Huff, N. C. Rath and G. Tellez. 2006. Limited treatment with ${\beta}$-1,3/1,6-glucan improves production values of broiler chickens challenged with Escherichia coli. Poult. Sci. 85:613-618.

13.
Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 1996. Influence of dried Bacillus subtilis and lactobacilli cultures on intestinal microflora and performance in broilers. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 9:397-404.

14.
Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin. 1998. Growth performance, intestinal microbial population, and serum cholesterol of broilers fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures. Poult. Sci. 77:1259-1265.

15.
Khaksefidi, A. and Sh. Rahimi. 2005. Effect of probiotic inclusion in the diet of broiler chickens on performance, feed efficiency and carcass quality. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18:1153-1156.

16.
Li, J., J. Xing, D. Li, X. Wang, L. Zhao, S. Lv and D. Huang. 2005. Effects of beta-glucan extracted from Saccharomyces cerevisiae on humoral and cellular immunity in weaned piglets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 59:303-312. crossref(new window)

17.
Liong, M. T. and N. Shah. 2006. Effects of Lactobacillus casei symbiotic on serum lipoprotein, intestinal microflora, and organic acids in rats. J. Dairy Sci. 89:1390-1399. crossref(new window)

18.
Lowry, V. K., M. B. Farnell, P. J. Ferro, C. L. Swaggerty, A. Bahl and M. H. Kogut. 2005. Purified ${\beta}$-glucan as an abiotic feed additive up-regulates the innate immune response in immature chickens against Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 98:309-318. crossref(new window)

19.
Maiolino, R., A. Fioretti, L. F. Menna and C. Meo. 1992. Research on the efficiency of probiotics in diets for broiler chickens. Nutr. Abst. Rev. Series B 62:482.

20.
Mohan, B., R. Kadirvel, A. Natarajan and M. Bhaskaran. 1996. Effect of probiotic supplementation on growth, nitrogen utilization and serum cholesterol in broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 37:395-401. crossref(new window)

21.
Mountzouris, K. C., P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S. Nitsch, G. Schtzmayr and K. Fegeros. 2007. Evaluation of efficacy of a probiotic containing lactobacillus, bifidobacterium, enterococcus, and pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult. Sci. 86:309-317.

22.
Nisbet, D. J., D. E. Corrier, C. M. Scanlan, A. G. Hollister, R. C. Beier and J. R. Deloach. 1993. Effect of defined continuous flow derived bacterial culture and dietary lactose on Salmonella colonization in broiler chickens. Avian Dis. 37:1017-1025. crossref(new window)

23.
National Research Council. 1994. Nutrients Requirements of Poultry. 9th rev. ed. National Academic Press, Washington, DC.

24.
Panda, A. K., M. R. Reddy, S. V. Ramarao and N. K. Praharaj. 2000. Effect of dietary supplementation of probiotic on performance and immune response of layers in decline phase of production. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 35:102-104.

25.
SAS. 2002. SAS User's guide. Statistics, ver. 8.e, Statistical Analysis System Institute. Inc., Cary, NC.

26.
Senanl, S., R. B. Rai, M. K. Padhi and S. K. Saha. 1997. Effects of feeding different levels of lactobacilli on the performance of broilers. Indian Vet. J. 74:808-810.

27.
Sohn, K. S., M. K. Kim, J. D. Kim and I. K. Han. 2000. The role of immunostimulants in monogastric animal and fish -Review- Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1178-1187.

28.
Tuohy, K. M., C. J. Ziemer, A. Klinder, Y. Knobel, B. L. Pool-Zobel and G.. R. Gibson. 2002. A human volunteer study to determine the probiotic effects of lactulose powder on human colonic microbiota. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 14:165-173. crossref(new window)