JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Egg Storage Material and Storage Period on Hatchability in Japanese Quail
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Egg Storage Material and Storage Period on Hatchability in Japanese Quail
Lacin, E.; Coban, O.; Sabuncuoglu, N.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The present study aimed to determine the effects of different storage materials and storage period on some hatchability traits of Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) eggs. A total of 32 male and 102 female quail (twelve weeks of ages) were housed in multiple-bird cages. Eggs laid were divided into three groups with respect to the period of storage (I = 1st, 2nd and 3rd days, II = 6th, 7th and 8th days, III = 12th, 13th and 14th days) prior to incubation. A total of 816 eggs was stored in 3 different storage environments during each storage period (B = no use of any storage material, P = use of perlite, H = use of hay) and kept in environmental conditions, where the temperature was and relative humidity was 75%, prior to incubation. Statistical analyses were performed after the exclusion of values pertaining to non-fertile eggs (190 eggs) from the data set. The fertility rate of the eggs in the experiment was 76.7%. In the present study, the influence of storage material and different storage periods on egg weight loss were found to be statistically significant (p<0.01). Upon the comparison of hatchability of fertile eggs values, the influence of storage material was determined to be significant (p<0.05), and the influence of storage period was demonstrated to be significant (p<0.01). The storage materials used were determined not to have any influence on early and late embryonic death rates. Perlite was concluded to be safe for use in the storage of hatching eggs. The extension of the storage period (more than 8 days) resulted in decreased hatchability values of fertile eggs in each group.
 Keywords
Laying Quail;Storage Period;Perlite;Hatchability;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Alkan, M., M. Karadas, M. Dogan and O. Demirbas. 2005. Adsorption of CTAB onto perlite samples from aqueous solutions. J. Colloid and Interface Sci. 291:309-318. crossref(new window)

2.
Altan, O., I. Oguz and P. Settar. 1995. Japon bildircinlarda yumurta agirligi ile ozgul agirligin kulucka ozelliklerine etkileri. Turk J. Agric. Foresty 19(4):219-222.

3.
Altan, O., A. Altan, H. Bayraktar and A. Demircioglu. 2002. Effect of short-term on hatchability and total incubation period of breeder hatching eggs. Tr. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 26:447-452.

4.
Arad, Z., U. Eylath, M. Ginsburg and H. Eyal-Giladi. 1989. Changes in uterine fluid composition and acid-base status during shell formation in the chicken. Am. J. Physiol. 257(2):732-737.

5.
Aydogan, M. 1998. Game birds. Turk Veteriner Hekimleri Dergisi 8(5):43-45.

6.
Bloom, S., D. E. Muscarella, M. Y. Lee and M. Rachlinski. 1998. Cell death in the avian blastoderm: resisstance to stres induced apoptosis and expression of antiapoptotic genes. Cell Death and Differentiation 5:529-538. crossref(new window)

7.
Brake, J. T. 1989. Hatchability of abnormal broiler breeder eggs. Poultry Misset 5:24-25.

8.
Brake, J., T. J. Walsch, C. E. Benton, J. R. In Petitte, R. Meijerhof and G. Panavalva. 1997. Egg handling and storage. Poult. Sci. 76:144-151.

9.
Britton, W. M. 1973. Vitelline membrane chemical composition in natural and induced yolk mottling. Poult. Sci. 52:459-464.

10.
Case, C. L., B. R. Funke and G. J. Tortora. 1989. Microcrobiology. In "An Introduction. The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Inc., p. 173" Redwood City, CA.

11.
Chestermen, C. W. 1975. Industrial minerals and rocks, 4th Ed., AIME and Pet. Eng., New York, p. 927-934.

12.
Dawes, C. M. 1975. Acid-base relationships within the avian egg. Biolog. Rev. 50:351-371.

13.
Decuypere, E., K. Tona, V. Brugeman and F. Bamelis. 2001. The day-old chick: A crucial hinge between breeders and broilers. World Poult. Sci. J. 57(2):127-128. crossref(new window)

14.
Fasenko, G. M., F. E. Robinson, R. T. Hardin and J. L. Wilson. 1992. Variability in preincubation embryonic development in domestic fowl. 2. Effects of duration of egg store period. Poult. Sci. 71(12):2129-2132.

15.
Fasenko, G. M., V. L. Christensen, M. J. Wineland and N. Petittej. 2001. Examining the effects of prestorage incubation of turkey breeder eggs on embriyonic development and hatchability of eggs stored four or fourteen days. Poult. Sci. 80:132-138.

16.
Harben, P. W. and R. L. Bates. 1990. Industrial minerals-Geolgy and world deposits: Surrey, UK, Metal Bulletin Plc. 184-189.

17.
Hurnik, G. I., B. S. Reinhart and J. F. Hurnik. 1978. Relationship between albumen quality and hatchability in fresh and stored eggs. Poult. Sci. 57:854-857.

18.
Kocak, C. and S. Ozkan. 2000. Bildircin, Sulun ve Keklik Yetistiriciligi. 1. Basim. Yardimci ders kitabi. Ege Univ. Ziraat Fakultesi Ofset Atolyesi. Izmir.

19.
Mayes, F. J. and M. A. Takeballi. 1984. Storage of eggs of fowl (Gallus Domesticus) before incubation. A review. World's Poult. Sci. 40(2):131-140. crossref(new window)

20.
Meijerhof, R. 1992. Pre-incubation holding of hatching eggs. World's Poult. Sci. 48:57-68. crossref(new window)

21.
Narahari, D., K. A. Mujeer and K. A. Rajini. 2002. Pre-oviposition factors influencing the fertility and hatchabilitiy in Japanese Quail. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 72(9):756-761.

22.
North, M. O. and D. B. Bell. 1990. Commerical chicken production mannual 4th ed. Avi Book, New York, NY.

23.
Pedroso, A. A., M. B. Cafe, N. S. M. Leandro, J. H. Stringhini and L. S. Chaves. 2006. Embrinary develpment and hatchability of quail eggs stored for different periods and incubated at different humidity and temperatures levels. R. Bras. Zootec. 35(6):2344-2349.

24.
Petek, M. 2006. Effect of feeding time on laying and reproductive performance of pharaoh quail (Coturnix coturnix Pharaoh) housed in different cage systems. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 19:67-71.

25.
Saylam, S. K. 1999. Japon bildircinlarinda yumurta agirliginin ve depolama suresinin yumurta agirlik kaybina ve kulucka ozelliklerine etkileri. Tr. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 23:367-372.

26.
Shafey, T. M. and H. Al-Mohsen. 2002. Embryonic growth, hatching time and hatchability performance of meat breeder eggs incubated under continuous green light. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 15:1702-1707.

27.
Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences 1996. SPSS for Windows Relase 10.01 Inc., Chicago

28.
Stern, C. D. 1991. The sub-embryonic fluid of the domestic fowl and its relationship to the early development of the embryo. In "Avien Incubation (Ed. S. G. Tullet). pp. 81-90" London, UK.

29.
Seker, I., S. Kul, M. Bayraktar, F. Ekmen and O. Yildirim. 2004. Japon bildircinlarinda (Coturnix coturnix japonica) kuluckalik yumurtalarin ana yasi ve depolama suresinin kulucka sonuclarina etkisi. Uludag Univ. J. Fac. Vet. Med. 23(1-2-3):59-64.

30.
Seker, I., S. Kul and M. Bayraktar. 2005. Effects of storage period and egg weight of Japanese quail eggs on hatching results. Arch. Tierz. Dummerstorf 48(5):518-526.

31.
Talebali, H. and A. Farzinpour. 2006. Effect of different levels of perlite on performance of broiler chicks. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 5(5):432-435. crossref(new window)

32.
Uddin, M. S., D. C. Paul and Q. M. E. Huque. 1994. Effect of egg weight and pre-incubation holding periods on hatchability of Japanese quail eggs in different seasons. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 7:499-503.

33.
Walsh, T. J., R. E. Rizk and J. Brake. 1995. Effect of storage for 7 or 14 days at two temperatures in the presence or absence of carbon dioxide on albumen characteristics, weight loss and early embryonic mortality of broiler hatching eggs. Poult. Sci. 74:1403-1410.

34.
Woodard, A. E. and A. Morzenti. 1975. Effect of turning and age of egg on hatchability in the pheasant, chukar, and Japanese quail. Poult. Sci. 54(5):1708-1711.