Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Mobile Bag and Sample Sizes on Intestinal Digestibility of Forage in Sheep
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Mobile Bag and Sample Sizes on Intestinal Digestibility of Forage in Sheep
Yayota, M.; Kouketsu, T.; Karashima, J.; Nakano, M.; Ohtani, S.;
  PDF(new window)
This study aimed to clarify the effect of mobile bag size and ratio of sample size to bag surface area on intestinal digestibility of forage in sheep. Four Suffolk ewes fitted with ruminal and proximal duodenal cannulae were fed second-cut Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) hay twice daily, and the same forage was used to measure intestinal digestibility. The forage samples were incubated in the rumen for 16 h and then in pepsin-HCl solution for 3 h before intestinal incubation. The incubated forage samples were placed in a nylon mobile bag. The bag sizes used were either 20 mm20 mm (small bag size; SBS) or 30 mm30 mm (large bag size; LBS) and the ratio of the sample size to the surface area of the bag was either 5.5 (low ratio; LR) or 11.0 (high ratio; HR) resulting in four different treatment conditions: SBS-LR, SBS-HR, LBS-LR and LBS-HR. Eight bags per animal were inserted through the duodenal cannulae at 15-min intervals and were subsequently collected from the feces of the animal. The mean intestinal bag transition time did not differ significantly between animals, but ranged from 23.2 to 27.0 h. The intestinal digestibility of dry matter (IDDM) ranged from 0.1620.019 g/g in the SBS-HR treatment group to 0.1950.018 g/g in the SBS-LR treatment. The intestinal digestibility of crude protein (IDCP) ranged from 0.6100.031 g/g in the LBS-LR treatment to 0.6930.018 g/g in the SBS-LR treatment. There was no difference in the IDDM and IDCP between different treatments. It was therefore concluded that the size of the mobile bag and the ratio of the sample size to the bag surface area did not influence the intestinal digestibility of forage. Future studies should use bags with high ratios of sample size to surface area in order to obtain sufficient residue for further analysis.
Forage;Intestinal Digestibility;Mobile Bag;Sheep;
 Cited by
AFFRC. 1996. Agriculture Forestry Fisher Research Council. Japanese Feeding Standard for Sheep. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan Livestock Industry Association, Tokyo, Japan. (in Japanese)

AOAC. 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia

Beckers, Y., A. Théwis and B. Maudoux. 1996. Intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded N of concentrates measured by the mobile nylon bag technique. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 61:305-323 crossref(new window)

De Boer, G., J. J. Murphy and J. J. Kennelly. 1987. Mobile nylon bag for estimating intestinal availability of rumen undegradable protein. J. Dairy Sci. 70:977-982 crossref(new window)

González, J., J. Faría-Mármol, C. A. Rodríguez and M. R. Alvir. 2001. Effects of stage of harvest on the protein value of fresh lucerne for ruminants. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 41:381-392 crossref(new window)

Haugen, H. L., S. K. Ivan, J. C. MacDonald and T. J. Klopfenstein. 2006. Determination of undegradable intake protein digestibility of forages using the mobile nylon bag technique. J. Anim. Sci. 84:886-893

Hvelplund, T., M. R. Weisbjerg and L. S. Andersen. 1992. Estimation of the true digestibility of rumen undegraded dietary protein in the small intestine of ruminants by the mobile bag technique. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Animal Sci. 42:34-39 crossref(new window)

Jarosz, L., T. Hvelplund, M. R. Weisbjerg and B. B. Jensen. 1994. True digestibility of protein in the small intestine and hind gut of cows measured with the mobile bag technique using 15Nlabelled roughage. Acta Agric. Scand., Sect. A, Animal Sci. 44:146-151 crossref(new window)

Nocek, J. E. 1988. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2051-2069 crossref(new window)

SAS Institute Inc. 2002. JMP User's guide: version 5.0.1. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina

Vanhatalo, A. and E. Ketoja. 1995. The role of the large intestine in post-ruminal digestion of feeds as measured by the mobilebag method in cattle. Br. J. Nutr. 73:491-505 crossref(new window)

Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597

Van Straalen, W. W., F. M. H. Dooper, A. M. Antoniewicz, I. Kosmala and A. M. Van Vauren. 1993. Intestinal digestibility in dairy cows of protein from grass and clover measured with mobile nylon bag and other methods. J. Dairy Sci. 76:2970-2981 crossref(new window)

Vanzant, E. S., R. C. Cochran and E. C. Titgemeyer. 1998. Standardization of in situ techniques for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2717-2729

Varvikko, T. and A. Vanhatalo. 1990. The effect of differing types of cloth and of contamination by non-feed nitrogen on intestinal digestion estimates using porous synthetic-fiber bags in cow. Br. J. Nutr. 63:221-229 crossref(new window)

Voigt, J., H. Piatkowski, H. Engelmann and E. Rudolph. 1985. Measurement of postruminal digestibility of crude protein by the bag technique in cows. Arch. Tierernähr. 35:555-562