JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Qualitative and Quantitative Feed Restriction on Growth Performance and Immune Function in Broiler Chickens
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Qualitative and Quantitative Feed Restriction on Growth Performance and Immune Function in Broiler Chickens
Jang, I.S.; Kang, S.Y.; Ko, Y.H.; Moon, Y.S.; Sohn, S.H.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The current study was conducted to investigate the effect of early feed restriction (FR, 8 to 14 d of age) on growth performance and immune function in broiler chickens. Birds were fed corresponding diets from 3 to 35 d of age, which consisted of three phases: starter (3 to 7 d of age), FR (8 to 14 d of age) and re-alimentation (15 to 35 d of age) phases. During the FR period, each group of birds was fed the basal diet ad libitum (CON), 85% (EN85) and 70% (EN70) of lower calorie diet ad libitum (qualitative FR), and 85% (FI85) and 70% (FI70) of voluntary intake on a daily basis (quantitative FR). As a result, there was no statistical difference in weight gain, feed intake and feed conversion ratio between the CON and quantitative or qualitative FR groups during the entire (3 to 35 d) periods. In particular, the EN85 group resulted in a significant (p<0.05) increase in weight gain compared with the EN70, FI85 and FI70 groups. Plasma total protein and albumin at 14 d of age (during FR) were significantly (p<0.05) lower in the quantitative and qualitative FR groups, but these parameters at 35 d of age (after re-alimentation) were higher (p<0.05) in the EN85 and EN70 groups than in the CON group. Plasma IgG level was unaffected by dietary FR procedure. In cytokines, there was no significant difference in the expression of lymphocytic IL-4 and IFN- at 14 d of age between the FR and the CON groups, whereas lymphocytic IL-6 and iNOS expression were significantly (p<0.05) lower in FI85 and FI70 groups. Moreover, lymphocytic iNOS was also significantly (p<0.05) lower in birds fed qualitative and quantitative diets compared with those fed ad libitum. In the thymus, IL-4 expression was higher (p<0.05) in FI85 and FI70 groups, whereas IL-6 expression was lower (p<0.05) in the FI85 and FI70 groups than in the CON group. Thymic iNOS was significantly (p<0.05) lower in birds fed qualitatively and quantitatively restricted diets compared with those fed ad libitum. At 35 d of age, there was no difference in the expression of IL-4, IL-6 and IFN- of lymphocytes and thymus between the FR and CON groups. In conclusion, 85% of quantitative and qualitative FR would have a beneficial effect on the expression of some cytokines including IL-4 and iNOS without change in growth performance of birds.
 Keywords
Broiler Chickens;Qualitative;Quantitative;Feed Restriction (FR);Growth Performance;Immune;Cytokines;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effects of the Combined Stress Induced by Stocking Density and Feed Restriction on Hematological and Cytokine Parameters as Stress Indicators in Laying Hens,;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2011. vol.24. 3, pp.414-420 crossref(new window)
2.
A Comparison of Various Energy and Protein Concentrations in Diets on the Performance, Bone Mineral Density and Blood Characteristics of Broiler Chicks,;;;

한국가금학회지, 2013. vol.40. 4, pp.369-377 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Benson, B. N., C. C. Calvert, E. Roura and K. C. Klasing. 1993. Dietary energy source and density modulate the expression of immunologic stress in chicks. J. Nutr. 123(10):1714-1723

2.
Bhattacharya, A., B. Chandrasekar, M. M. Rahman, J. Banu, J. X. Kang and G. Fernandes. 2006. Inhibition of inflammatory response in transgenic fat-1 mice on a calorie-restricted diet. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 349(3):925-930 crossref(new window)

3.
Cook, M. E. 1991. Nutrition and immune response of the domestic fowl. CRC Crit. Rev. Poult. Biol. 3:167-189

4.
de Jong, I. C., A. S. van Voorst and H. J. Blokhuis. 2003. Parameters for quantification of hunger in broiler breeders. Physiol. Behav. 78(4-5):773-783 crossref(new window)

5.
de Jong, I. C., S. van Voorst, D. A. Ehlhardt and H. J. Blokhuis. 2002. Effects of restricted feeding on physiological stress parameters in growing broiler breeders. Br. Poult. Sci. 43(2):157-168 crossref(new window)

6.
Fassbinder-Orth, C. A. and W. H. Karasov. 2006. Effects of feed restriction and realimentation on digestive and immune function in the leghorn chick. Poult. Sci. 80:1449-1456

7.
Glick, B., E. J. Day and D. Thompson. 1981. Calorie-protein deficiencies and the immune response of the chicken I. Humoral immunity. Poult. Sci. 60(11):2494-2500 crossref(new window)

8.
Glick, B., R. L. Taylor Jr, D. E. Martin, M. Watabe, E. J. Day and D. Thompson. 1983. Calorie-protein deficiencies and the immune response of the chicken. II. Cell-mediated immunity. Poult. Sci. 62(9):1889-1893 crossref(new window)

9.
Guzik, T. J., R. Korbut and T. Adamek-Guzik. 2003. Nitric oxide and superoxide in inflammation and immune regulation - Review. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 54(4):469-487

10.
Hangalapura, B. N., M. G. Nieuwland, G. De Vries Reilingh, J. Buyse, H. Van Den Brand, B. Kemp and H. K. Parmentier. 2005. Severe feed restriction enhances innate immunity but suppresses cellular immunity in chicken lines divergently selected for antibody responses. Poult. Sci. 84(10):1520-1529

11.
Janeway, C. A., P. Travers, M. Walport and M. Shlomchik. 2001. The adaptive immune responses. In; Immunology V (Ed. C. A. Janeway). Garland Publishing New York, NY. pp. 295-381

12.
Jolly, C. A. 2004. Dietary restriction and immune function - Review. J. Nutr. 134(8):1853-1856

13.
Julian, R. J. 1993. Ascites in poultry. Avian Pathol. 22:419-454 crossref(new window)

14.
Khajavi, M., S. Rahimi, Z. M. Hassan, M. A. Kamali and T. Mousavi. 2003. Effect of feed restriction early in life on humoral and cellular immunity of two commercial broiler strains under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 44(3):490-497

15.
Kestin, S. C., T. G. Knowles, A. E. Tinch and N. G. Gregory. 1992. Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotype. Vet. Rec. 131(9):190-194

16.
Kidd, M. T. 2004. Nutritional modulation of immune function in broilers - Review. Poult. Sci. 83(4):650-657

17.
Kim, Y. J., H. J. Kim, J. K. No, H. Y. Chung and G. Fernandes. 2006. Anti-inflammatory action of dietary fish oil and calorie restriction. Life Sci. 78(21):2523-2532 crossref(new window)

18.
Klasing, K. C. 1998. Nutritional modulation of resistance to infectious diseases - Review. Poult. Sci. 77(8):1119-1125 crossref(new window)

19.
Lee, K. H. and S. Leeson. 2001. Performance of broilers fed limited quantities of feed or nutrients during seven to fourteen days of age. Poult. Sci. 80(4):446-454

20.
Leeson, S. and A. K. Zubair. 1997. Nutrition of the broiler chicken around the period of compensatory growth. Poult. Sci. 76(7):992-999

21.
Liew, P. K., I. Zulkifli, M. Hair-Bejo, A. R. Omar and D. A. Israf. 2003. Effects of early age feed restriction and heat conditioning on heat shock protein 70 expression, resistance to infectious bursal disease, and growth in male broiler chickens subjected to heat stress. Poult. Sci. 82(12):1879-1885

22.
Muthukumar, A. R., C. A. Jolly, K. Zaman and G. Fernandes. 2000. Calorie restriction decreases proinflammatory cytokines and polymeric Ig receptor expression in the submandibular glands of autoimmune prone (NZB×NZW) F1 mice. J. Clin. Immunol. 20(5):354-361 crossref(new window)

23.
Olkowski, A. A., C. Wojnarowicz, S. Nain, B. Ling, J. M. Alcorn and B. Laarveld. 2008. A study on pathogenesis of sudden death syndrome in broiler chickens. Res. Vet. Sci. 85(1):131-140 crossref(new window)

24.
Ozkan, S., I. Plavnik and S. Yahav. 2006. Effects of early feed restriction on performane and asscites development in broiler chickens subsequently raised at low ambient temperature. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 15:9-19

25.
Payne, C. J., T. R. Scott, J. W. Dick and B. Glick. 1990. Immunity to Pasteurella multocida in protein-deficient chickens. Poult. Sci. 69(12):2134-2142

26.
Plavnik, I. and S. Hurwitz. 1988. Early feed restriction in chicks: effect of age, duration, and sex. Poult. Sci. 67(3):384-390

27.
Praharaj, N. K., M. R. Reddy, S. V. Raman Rao, G. Shyamsunder and L. N. Reddy. 1999. Energy by sire family interactions for growth, feed efficiency, immune competence in commercial broiler. Arch. Gefl$\ddot{u}$gelkd. 63:82-86

28.
Sandilands, V., B. J. Tolkamp and L. Kyriazakis. 2005. Behaviour of food restricted broilers during rearing and lay-effects of an alternative feeding method. Physiol. Behav. 85(2):115-123 crossref(new window)

29.
SAS. 1989. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6, 4th Edition. Vol 2. SAS Ins., Cary, NC

30.
Sunder, G. S., C. V. Kumar, A. K. Panda, M. V. L. N. Raju, S. V. R. Rao, N. C. S. Gopinath and M. R. Reddy. 2007. Restriction of metabolizable energy in broiler growers and its impacts on grower and breeder performance. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20(8):1258-1265

31.
Tolkamp, B. J., V. Sandilands and I. Kyriazakis. 2005. Effects of qualitative feed restriction during rearing on the performance of broiler breeders during rearing and lay. Poult. Sci. 84(8):1286-1293

32.
Wilson, M. 2005. Production focus (In; Balancing genetics, welfare and economics in broiler production). Vol 1 (no. 1). pp 1. Publication of Cobb-Vantress, Inc

33.
Weindruch, R. and R. L. Walford. 1988. The retardation of aging and disease by dietary restriction. Thomas Press, Springfiled, IL. pp. 7-215

34.
Yu, B. P. 1996. Aging and oxidative stress; modulation by dietary restriction. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 21:651-668 crossref(new window)

35.
Zhan, X. A., M. Wang, H. Ren, R. Q. Zhao, J. X. Li and Z. L. Tan. 2007. Effect of early feed restriction on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 86(4):654-660

36.
Zubair, A. K. and S. Leeson. 1994. Effect of varying period of early nutrient restriction on growth compensation and carcass characteristics of male broilers. Poult. Sci. 73(1):129-136