JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Correlations among Shearing Force, Morphological Characteristic, Chemical Composition, and In situ Digestibility of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) Stem
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Correlations among Shearing Force, Morphological Characteristic, Chemical Composition, and In situ Digestibility of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) Stem
Liu, L.; Yang, Z.B.; Yang, W.R.; Jiang, S.Z.; Zhang, G.G.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) is a high-quality forage for ruminants and the main stem is the dominant morphological component contributing to the forage nutritive value in mature alfalfa forage. Shearing force, a fracturing property of plant stem, is an important indictor of forage value. The objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of morphological characteristic on shearing force, the relationship between shearing force and chemical composition, and the relationship between shearing force and in situ digestibility of alfalfa stem. The results showed that linear density (weight per unit length of stem) was more important than chemical composition in affecting shearing force. There was a positive relationship between lignin content and shearing force (r = 0.78). Correlations were not found between shearing force and other chemical components such as neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), cellulose and hemicelluloses. In situ digestibility (of dry matter and NDF) was related to shearing force. A negative correlation was found between shearing force and dry matter (DM) digestibility (r = -0.70), and there was also a negative correlation between shearing force and NDF digestibility (r = -0.87). When shearing force was standardized for stem diameter or stem linear density, the relationship between shearing force and digestibility was consistent regardless of stem diameter and stem linear density. Shearing force was significantly correlated with lignin content and in situ digestibility (of DM and NDF), and was a more direct indicator for estimating forage nutritive value related to animal performance, so it can be used to predict the forage value of alfalfa.
 Keywords
Alfalfa Stems;Shearing Force;Stem Diameter;Stem Linear Density;Chemical Compositions;In situ Digestibility;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Variation and Correlation of Shearing Force with Feed Nutritional Characteristics of Wheat Straw,;;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2013. vol.26. 10, pp.1466-1473 crossref(new window)
 References
1.
Assoumaya, C., D. Sauvant, F. Pommier, M. Boval, B. Calif and H. Archimede. 2009. Effect of f requency of meals on intake and digestion of tropical grass consumed by rams. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22:72-81

2.
Ba, N. X., N. H. Van, L. D. Ngoan, C. M. Lwddin and P. T. Doyle. 2008. Effects of amount of concentrate supplement on forage intake, diet digestibility and live weight gain in yellow cattle in Vietnam. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1736-1744

3.
Buxton, D. R., J. S. Hornstein and G. C. Marten. 1987. Genetic variation for forage quality of alfalfa stems. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 67:1057-1067 crossref(new window)

4.
Chen, Y. X., J. Chen, Y. F. Zhang and D. W. Zhou. 2007. Effects of harvest date on shearing force of maize stems. Livest. Sci. 111:33-44 crossref(new window)

5.
Esau, K. 1977. Anatomy of seed plants. Wiley, New York, p. 550

6.
Feng, Y. L. 2004. Ruminant nutrition. Science Technology Press, Beijing, p. 574 (In Chinese)

7.
Evans, P. S. 1967. Leaf strength studies of pasture grasses: II. Strength, cellulose content and sclerenchyma tissue proportions of eight grasses grown as single plants. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 69:175-181 crossref(new window)

8.
Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analyses. Agricultural Handbook No. 379, US Department of Agricultural, Washington, DC. p. 387

9.
Habib, M., G. E. Pollott and J. D. Leaver. 2008. Effect of cattle genotype and variable feed supple on forage intake and digestibility. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1435-1440

10.
Herrro, M., C. B. do. Valle, N. R. G. Hughes, V. de O. Sabatel and N. S. Jessop. 2001. Measurements of physical strength and their relationship to the chemical composition of four species of Brachiaria. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 92:149-158 crossref(new window)

11.
Hughes, N. R. G., C. B. do. Valle, V. Sabatel, J. Boock, N. S. Jessop and M. Herrero. 2000. Shearing strength as an additional selection criterion for quality in Brachiaria pasture ecotypes. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.)135:123-130 crossref(new window)

12.
Inoue, T., I. M. Brookes, A. John, W. F. Hunt and T. N. Barry. 1994. Effects of leaf shear breaking load on the feeding value of perennial ryegrass (Loliun perenne) for sheep:Ⅰ.Effects on leaf anatomy and morphology. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.)123:129-136

13.
Inoue, T., I. M. Brookes, A. John, W. F. Hunt and T. N. Barry. 1994. Effects of leaf shear breaking load on the feeding value of perennial ryegrass (Loliun perenne) for sheep: II. Effects on feed intake, particle breakdown, rumen digesta outflow and animal performance. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 123:137-147

14.
Iwaasa, A. D., K. A. Beauchemin, J. G. Buchanan-Smith and S. N. Acharya. 1996. A shearing technique measuring resistance properties of plant stems. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 57:225-237 crossref(new window)

15.
Iwaasa, A. D., K. A. Beauchemin, S. N. Acharya, S. R. Bowley and J. G. Buchanan-Smith. 1998. Shearing force of alfalfa stems as affected by seeding rate. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 78:273-280

16.
Kokubo, A., S. Kuraishi and N. Sakurai. 1989. Culm strength of barley. Correlation among maximum bending stress, cell wall dimensions, and cellulose content. Plant Physiol. 91:876-882 crossref(new window)

17.
Kokubo, A., N. Sakurai, S. Kuraishi and K. Takeda. 1991. Culm brittleness of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mutants is caused by smaller number of cellulose molecules in cell wall. Plant Physiol. 97:509-514 crossref(new window)

18.
Mackinnon, B. W., H. S. Easton, T. N. Barry and J. R. Sedcole. 1988. The effect of reduced leaf shear strength on the nutritive value of perennial ryegrass. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 111:469-474 crossref(new window)

19.
McClellad, D. J. and R. E. Spielrein. 1957. An investigation of the ultimate bending strength of some common pasture plants. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 2:288-292

20.
Mehrez, A. Z. and E. R. $\O$rskov. 1977. A study of the artificial fiber bag technique for determining the digestibility of feeds in the rumen. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 88:645-650 crossref(new window)

21.
Mowat, D. N., R. S. Fulkerso and E. E. Gamble. 1967. Relationship between stem diameter and in vitro digestibility of forage. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 47:423-426 crossref(new window)

22.
Prince, R. P., D. D. Wolf, Jr. and J. W. Bartok. 1965. The physical property measurements of forage stalks. Agric. Exp. Sta., University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. Bull, pp. 1-27

23.
Pritchard, G. I., L. P. Folkins and W. J. Pigden. 1963. The in vitro digestibility of whole grasses and their parts at progressive stages of maturity. Can. J. Plant. Sci. 43:79-87 crossref(new window)

24.
Sunagawa, K., T. Ooshiro, N. Nakamura, Y. Ishii, I. Nagamine and A. Shinjo. 2007. Physiological factors depressing feed intake and saliva secretion in goats fed on dry forage. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:60-69

25.
Sunagawa, K., T. Ooshiro, Y. Murase, R. Hazama and I. Nagamine. 2007. Mechanisms controlling feed intake in large-type goats fed on dry forage. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1182-1189

26.
Van Soest, P. J. and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3597

27.
Wilkins, R. J. 1966. The digestibility of forage and its relationship to lignification. Ph.D. Thesis. University of New England

28.
Wilkins, R. J. 1972. The potential digestibility of cellulose in grasses and its relationship with chemical and anatomical parameters. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 78:457-464 crossref(new window)

29.
Wilson, J. R., M. N. Mcleod and D. J. Minson. 1989. Particle size reduction of the leaves of a tropical and temperate grass by cattle: 1. Effects of chewing during eating and varying times of digestion. Grass and Forage Sci. 44:55-63 crossref(new window)

30.
Wilson, J. R. 1994. Cell wall characteristics in relation to forage digestion by ruminants - A Review. J. Agric. Sci. (Camb.) 122:173-182 crossref(new window)