JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effects of Restricted Feeding on Intake, Digestion, Nitrogen Balance and Metabolizable Energy in Small and Large Body Sized Sheep Breeds
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effects of Restricted Feeding on Intake, Digestion, Nitrogen Balance and Metabolizable Energy in Small and Large Body Sized Sheep Breeds
Kamalzadeh, A.; Aouladrabiei, M.R.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Ninety six intact male sheep (12 months old with mean live weight of about 35 kg) were used to assess the effects of restricted feeding on intake, digestion, nitrogen balance and metabolizable energy (ME). The animals were selected from two known Iranian small and large body size breeds: 48 Sangsari (S) and 48 Afshari (A), and were divided into two equal groups: restricted (R) and a control (C). Each group had 48 sheep (24 each breed). The experiment had a duration of 15 and 75 days adaptation and treatment periods, respectively. The animals were individually placed in metabolism cages and fed a diet based on pelleted concentrate mixture consisting of alfalfa, barley grain, cottonseed meal and barley straw. The animals in group C were fed ad libitum, while animals in group R were fed at maintenance level and maintained a relatively constant live weight. During the experiment, the average daily weight gain (ADG) of S and A animals in R group was 0.34 and -0.25 g/d (0.02 and -0.02 ), respectively. While that of S and A animals in C group was 174.4 and 194.4 g/d (10.16 and 11.48 ), respectively. Nitrogen (N) was determined by both measured and regression methods. Animals of R group stayed at about zero N balance (0.01 and -0.00 g for S and A animals, respectively). The N retention of animals of both S and A breeds in C group were similar (0.45 and 0.46 g , respectively). Digestible organic matter intake (DOMI) and ME requirement for maintenance (MEm) were measured by both constant weight technique and regression method by regressing N balance on DOMI and ME intake on ADG. The measured DOMI during constant weight was 24.61 and 24.27 g and the calculated DOMI from regression equation was 24.24 and 24.22 g , for S and A animals, respectively. The measured MEm was 402 and 401 kJ and the calculated MEm from regression analysis was 398 and 400 kJ for S and A breeds, respectively. There were no significant differences between both measured and regression techniques. There was no significant difference between S and A breeds for DOMI, N retention, MEm, digestibility and metabolizability values. Digestibility values for OM, GE and CP and metabolizability were significantly (p<0.05) higher in restricted feeding sheep compared with that of sheep fed ad libitum.
 Keywords
Nitrogen Balance;Restricted Feeding;Digestion;Metabolizable Energy;Sheep;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Agricultural Research Council (ARC) 1980. The nutrient requirements of ruminant livestock. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, England

2.
Al Jassim, R. A. M., S. A. Hassan and A. N. Al-Ani. 1996. Metabolizable energy requirements for maintenance and growth of Awassi lambs. Small Rum. Res. 20:239-245 crossref(new window)

3.
Al-Mamun, M., C. Ito, A. Sato, T. Fujita and H. Sano. 2007. Comparison of the [2H5]phenylalanine model with the [1- 13C]leucine method to determine whole body protein synthesis and degradation in sheep fed at two levels. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20(10):1517-1524

4.
AOAC. 1989. Official methods of analysis (14th edition). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, VA, pp. 152-157

5.
Assoumaya, C., D. Sauvant, F. Pommier, M. Boval, B. Calif and H. Archimède. 2009. Effect of frequency of meals on intake and digestion of tropical grass consumed by rams. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 22(1):72-81

6.
CSIRO. 2001. Testing sheep for methane production. Science image, CSIRO Division, GA 1334

7.
Ferrell, C. L., L. J. Koong and J. A. Nienaber. 1986. Effect of previous nutrition on body composition and maintenance energy costs of growing lambs. Br. J. Nutr. 56:595-605 crossref(new window)

8.
Gingins, M., H. Bickel and A. Schurch. 1980. Efficiency of energy utilization in undernourished and realimented sheep. Livest. Prod. Sci. 7:465-471 crossref(new window)

9.
Graham, N. McC. and T. W. Searle. 1975. Studies of weaner sheep during and after a period of weight stasis. I. Energy and nitrogen utilization. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 26:343-354 crossref(new window)

10.
Graham, N. McC. and T. W. Searle. 1979. Studies of weaned lambs before, during and after a period of weight loss. I. Energy and nitrogen utilization. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 30:513-523 crossref(new window)

11.
Hirayama, T. and K. Katoh. 2004. Effects of heat exposure and restricted feeding on behavior, digestibility and growth hormone secretion in goats. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 17(5):655-658

12.
Kamalzadeh, A. 2004. Energy and nitrogen metabolism in lambs during feed restriction and realimentation. J. Agric. Sci. Tech. 6:21-30

13.
Kamalzadeh, A. 2005. Modeling the productivity of a breeding sheep flock for different production systems. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 18(5):606-612

14.
Kamalzadeh, A. and A. Shabani. 2007. Maintenance and growth requirements for energy and nitrogen of Baluchi sheep. Inter J. Agric. Biol. 9(4):535-539

15.
Kamalzadeh, A., J. Van Bruchem, W. J. Koops, S. Tamminga and D. Zwart. 1997. Feed quality restriction and compensatory growth in growing sheep: feed intake, digestion, nitrogen balance and modelling changes in feed efficiency. Livest. Prod. Sci. 52:209-217 crossref(new window)

16.
Ketelaars, J. J. M. H. and B. J. Tolkamp. 1991. Toward a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants. PhD thesis, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands

17.
Mahouachi, M. and N. Atti. 2005. Effects of restricted feeding and re-feeding of Barbarine lambs: intake, growth and non-carcass components. Anim. Sci. 81:305-312

18.
Mohammad, H. H., A. S. Ahmad and E. D. Salman. 1989. Determination of maintenance energy requirement of Awassi sheep. Proc. 5th Scientific Conference, Science Research Council, Baghdad, p. 176

19.
Oosting, S. J., J. Van Bruchem and X. B. Chen. 1995. Intake, digestion and small intestine protein availability in sheep in relation to ammoniation of wheat-straw with or without protein supplementation. Br. J. Nutr. 74:347-368 crossref(new window)

20.
Ryan, W. J. 1990. Compensatory growth in cattle and sheep. Nutr. Abs. Rev. Ser. B, 60:653-664

21.
Sandberg, F. B., G. C. Emmans and I. Kyriazakis. 2006. A model for predicting feed intake of growing animals during exposure to pathogens. J. Anim. Sci. 84:1552-1566

22.
Steel, R. G. D. and J. H. Torrie. 1982. Principles and procedures of statistics. A Biometric Approach. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 139-145

23.
Sun, H. X. and W. Zhou. 2007. Seasonal changes in voluntary intake and digestibility by sheep grazing introduced Leymus chinensis pasture. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20(6):872-879 crossref(new window)

24.
Thomson, E. F., H. Bickel and A. Schürch. 1982. Growth performance and metabolic changes in lambs and steers after mild nutritional restriction. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 98:183-194 crossref(new window)

25.
Wellock, I. J., G. C. Emmans and I. Kyriazakis. 2003. Predicting the consequences of social stresses on pig feed intake and performance. J. Anim. Sci. 81:2995-3007

26.
Zemmelink, G., B. J. Tolkamp and N. W. M. Ogink. 1991. Energy requirements for maintenance and gain of West African Dwarf goats. Small Rum. Res. 5:205-215 crossref(new window)