JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Butyric Acid on Performance, Gastrointestinal Tract Health and Carcass Characteristics in Broiler Chickens
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Butyric Acid on Performance, Gastrointestinal Tract Health and Carcass Characteristics in Broiler Chickens
Panda, A.K.; Rama Rao, S.V.; Raju, M.V.L.N.; Shyam Sunder, G.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of graded levels of butyric acid (butyrate) on performance, gastrointestinal tract health and carcass characteristics in young broiler chickens. Control starter (0-3 wk) and finisher (4-5 wk) diets were formulated to contain 2,900 kcal ME/kg and 22% CP, and 3,000 kcal ME/kg and 20% CP, respectively. Subsequently, four other experimental diets were formulated to contain 0.05% antibiotic (furazolidone) or 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6% butyric acid. Each diet was fed at random to 8 replicates of 6 chicks each throughout the experimental period (0-5 wk). The results showed that 0.4% butyrate in the diet was similar to antibiotic in maintaining body weight gain and reducing E. coli numbers but superior for feed conversion ratio. No added advantage on these parameters was obtained by enhancing the concentration of butyrate from 0.4 to 0.6% in the diet. Feed intake and mortality were not influenced by the dietary treatments. A reduction in pH of the upper GI tract (crop, proventiculus and gizzard) was observed by inclusion of butyrate in the diets of broilers compared to either control or antibiotic-fed group. Butyrate at 0.4% was more effective in reducing the pH than 0.2% butyrate. Within the lower GI tract, 0.4 and 0.6% butyrate was effective in lowering pH in the duodenum, but no effect was found in either the jejunum or ileum. The villus length and crypt depth in the duodenum increased significantly in all the butyrate treated diets irrespective of the level tested. Carcass yield was higher and abdominal fat content was lower significantly in all the butyrate treatment groups compared to the control or antibiotic group. From these findings, it is concluded that 0.4% butyric acid supplementation maintained performance, intestinal tract health, and villi development and carcass quality in broiler chickens.
 Keywords
Butyric Acid;Performance;GI Tract Health;Carcass Characteristics;Broiler Chickens;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effects of Keratinase on Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Intestinal Morphology, Intestinal Ecology and Inflammatory Response of Weaned Piglets Fed Diets with Different Levels of Crude Protein,;;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2011. vol.24. 12, pp.1718-1728 crossref(new window)
2.
Effects of Tributyrin on Intestinal Energy Status, Antioxidative Capacity and Immune Response to Lipopolysaccharide Challenge in Broilers,;;;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2015. vol.28. 12, pp.1784-1793 crossref(new window)
1.
Effects of captivity and artificial breeding on microbiota in feces of the red-crowned crane (Grus japonensis), Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 1  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Influence of Fasting during Moult on the Faecal Microbiota of Penguins, PLoS ONE, 2014, 9, 6, e99996  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Effect of Partially-Protected Sodium Butyrate and Virginiamycin on Nutrient Digestibility, Metabolizable Energy, Serum Metabolites and Performance of Broiler Chickens, International Journal of Poultry Science, 2016, 15, 8, 304  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Effects of Tributyrin on Intestinal Energy Status, Antioxidative Capacity and Immune Response to Lipopolysaccharide Challenge in Broilers, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2015, 28, 12, 1784  crossref(new windwow)
5.
Studying the effect of formic acid and potassium diformate on performance, immunity and gut health of broiler chickens, Animal Nutrition, 2016, 2, 4, 296  crossref(new windwow)
6.
Effect of butyrate, clopidol and their combination on the performance of broilers infected withEimeria maxima, British Poultry Science, 2014, 55, 4, 474  crossref(new windwow)
7.
Intestinal integrity and performance of broiler chickens fed a probiotic, a prebiotic, or an organic acid, Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 2014, 16, 4, 417  crossref(new windwow)
8.
Importance of release location on the mode of action of butyrate derivatives in the avian gastrointestinal tract, World's Poultry Science Journal, 2016, 72, 01, 61  crossref(new windwow)
9.
Dietary organic acids for broiler chickens: a review, Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuaria, 2015, 28, 2  crossref(new windwow)
10.
The effect of Boswellia serrata resin diet supplementation on production, hematological, biochemical and immunological parameters in broiler chickens, animal, 2017, 1  crossref(new windwow)
11.
The microbiome of the chicken gastrointestinal tract, Animal Health Research Reviews, 2012, 13, 01, 89  crossref(new windwow)
12.
Dietary factors affecting hindgut protein fermentation in broilers: a review, World's Poultry Science Journal, 2015, 71, 01, 139  crossref(new windwow)
13.
Recent advances in the role of organic acids in poultry nutrition, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 2016, 44, 1, 359  crossref(new windwow)
14.
Effects of supplementation level and feeding schedule of butyrate glycerides on the growth performance and carcass composition of broiler chickens, Poultry Science, 2017  crossref(new windwow)
15.
Sodium butyrate in chicken nutrition: the dynamics of performance, gut microbiota, gut morphology, and immunity, World's Poultry Science Journal, 2016, 72, 02, 265  crossref(new windwow)
16.
Dose–response effects of an antimicrobial peptide, a cecropin hybrid, on growth performance, nutrient utilisation, bacterial counts in the digesta and intestinal morphology in broilers, British Journal of Nutrition, 2012, 108, 10, 1756  crossref(new windwow)
17.
Effects of Keratinase on Performance, Nutrient Utilization, Intestinal Morphology, Intestinal Ecology and Inflammatory Response of Weaned Piglets Fed Diets with Different Levels of Crude Protein, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2011, 24, 12, 1718  crossref(new windwow)
18.
Effect of the commercial product Lumance™, a combination of partly esterified organic acids and plant extracts, on the productive performance of broiler chickens, Journal of Applied Animal Nutrition, 2014, 2  crossref(new windwow)
19.
Vacuum coating of pelleted feed for broilers: Opportunities and challenges, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 200, 1  crossref(new windwow)
20.
Interspecific variations in the faecal microbiota ofProcellariiformseabirds, FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2014, 89, 1, 47  crossref(new windwow)
21.
Alternatives to antibiotics for maximizing growth performance and feed efficiency in poultry: a review, Animal Health Research Reviews, 2017, 1  crossref(new windwow)
22.
Effect of supplemental organic acids on performance, carcass characteristics, and serum biochemical metabolites in broilers fed diets containing different crude protein levels, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 211, 109  crossref(new windwow)
23.
Growth Performance, Intestinal Histomorphology, Blood Hematology and Serum Metabolites of Broilers Chickens Fed Diet Supplemented with Graded Levels of Acetic Acid, International Journal of Pharmacology, 2016, 12, 8, 874  crossref(new windwow)
24.
Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Regulation of Gene Expression for Lipid Catabolism in Young Broilers by Butyrate Glycerides, PLOS ONE, 2016, 11, 8, e0160751  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Adams, C. A. 2004. Nutricines in poultry production: focus on bioactive feed ingredients. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. (B):1-12

2.
American Public Health Association. 1984. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. $2^{nd}$ edn. (Ed.) Washington DC

3.
Antongiovanni, M., A. Buccioni, F. Petacchi, S. Leeson, S. Minieri, A. Martini and R. Cecchi. 2007. Butyric acid glycerides in the diet of broiler chickens: effects on gut histology and carcass composition. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 6:19-25

4.
Bolton, W. and W. A. Dewar. 1965. The digestibility of acetic, propionic and butyric acid by the fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 6:103-105 crossref(new window)

5.
Bron, F., B. Kettlitz and E. Arrigoni. 2002. Resistant starches and the butyrate revolution. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 13:251-261 crossref(new window)

6.
Calnek, B. W., H. J. Barnes, C. W. Beard, W. M. Reid and H. W. Yoder, Jr. 1991. Diseases of Poultry, $9^{th}$ edn. (Ames, Iowa State University Press)

7.
Culling, C. F. A. 1963. Hand book of histopathological techniques. 11edn.

8.
Dibner, J. J. and R. J. Buttin. 2002 .Use of organic acids as a model to study the impact of Gut microflora in nutrition and metabolism J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:453:463

9.
Duncan, D. B. 1995. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42

10.
Izat, A. L., N. M. Tidwell, R. A. Thomas, M. A. Reiber, M. H. Adams, M. Colberg and P. W. Waldroup. 1990. Effects of a buffered propionic acid in details on the performance of broiler chickens and on microflora of the intestine and carcass. Poult. Sci. 69:818-826

11.
Jin, L. Z., Y. W. Ho, N. Abdullah and S. Jalaludin.1997. Probitics in poultry : modes of action. World's Poult. Sci. J. 53:351-368 crossref(new window)

12.
Kik, M. J. L., A. F. Husisman, B. van der Poel and J. M. V. M. Mouwen. 1990. Pathologic changes of the small intestinal mucosa of pigs after feeding phaseolis vulgaris beans. Vet. Pathol. 27:329-334 crossref(new window)

13.
Kwan, Y. M. and S. C. Ricke. 2005. Induction of acid resistance of salmonella typhimurium by exposure to short chain fatty acids. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:3458-3463

14.
Leeson, S., H. Namkung, M. Antongiovanni and E. H. Lee. 2005. Effect of butric acid on the performance and carcass yield of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 84:1418-1422

15.
Lesson, S. 2007. Butyratelancing science versus societal issues in poultry nutrition. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. (B). 71:1-5

16.
Mast, J. and B. M. Goddeeris. 1999. Development of immunecompetence of broiler chickens. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 70:245-256 crossref(new window)

17.
Pinchasov, Y. and L. S. Jensen. 1989. Effect of short-chain fatty acids on voluntary feed intake of broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 68:1612-1618

18.
Sakata, T. 1987. Stimulatory effect of short-chain fatty aids on epithelial cell proliferation in the rat intestine: a possible explanation for tropic effects of fermentable fibre, gut microbes and luminal tropic factors. Br. J. Nutr. 58:95-103 crossref(new window)

19.
Seto, F. 1981. Early development of the avian immune system. Poult. Sci. 60:1981-1995

20.
Sharma, R., U. Schumarcher, V. Ronaasen and M. coates. 1995. Rat intestinal mucosal responses to a microbial flora and different diets. Gut. 36:206-214 crossref(new window)

21.
Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. Statistical Methods. Oxford and IBH. Publishing Company, New Delhi

22.
Van der wielen, P. 2000. Dietary strategies to influence the gastrointestinal microflora of young animals and its potential to improve intestinal health. pp. 37-60 in Nutrition and Health of the Gastrointestinal Tract. M.C. Blok, H.A

23.
Van Immerseel, F., F. Boyen, I. Gantois, L. Timbermont, L. Bohez, F. Pasmans, F. Haesebrouck and R. Ducatelle. 2005. Supplementation of coated butyric acid in the feed reduces colonization and shedding of salmonella in poultry. Poult. Sci. 84:1851-1856

24.
Van Immerseel, F., V. Fievez, J. De Buck, F. Pasmans, A. Martel, F. Haesebrouk and R. Ducatelle. 2004. Microencapsulated shortchain fatty acids in feed modify colonization and invasion early after infection with Salmonella enteritidis in young chickens. Poult. Sci. 83:69-74

25.
Yang, P., P. A. Iji and M. Choct. 2007. Effects of different dietary levels of mannan oligosaccharide on growth performance and gut development of broiler chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 20:1084-1091