Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Comparison of Rectal and Infrared Thermometry for Obtaining Body Temperature of Gnotobiotic Piglets in Conventional Portable Germ Free Facility
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Comparison of Rectal and Infrared Thermometry for Obtaining Body Temperature of Gnotobiotic Piglets in Conventional Portable Germ Free Facility
Chung, Tae-Ho; Jung, Woo-Sung; Nam, Eui-Hwa; Kim, Ji-Hyun; Park, Seol-Hee; Hwang, Cheol-Yong;
  PDF(new window)
Gnotobiotic piglets (n = 10) were hand-reared in conventional germ-free facilities. Piglet body temperatures were measured with rectal and non-contact infrared thermometry (NIFT) on the lower eyelid, auricular center and margin, parietal regions, axilla, central abdomen and dorsum, and the perianal region. Body temperature measurements at central abdomen, cranial dorsum, and perianal regions had NIFT values which had a significant linear relationship (p<0.0001) with rectal thermometry. The predicted equations of between-subject formulas were calculated as follows: rectal temperature, 28.07489+0.30372central abdominal surface temperature; rectal temperature, 34.02799+0.15197central dorsum surface temperature; and rectal temperature, 33.87937+0.15676perianal temperature. These results suggested that NIFT could serve as a valid alternative to rectal thermometry in a portable germ-free facility without disturbing experimental animals. The development of a NIFT body temperature evaluation that does not require animal restraint is clinically advantageous, particularly in gnotobiotic piglets, and would be significantly less stressful for experimental procedures in germ-free facilities.
Gnotobiotic Piglet;Rectal Temperature;Infrared Thermometry;Portable Germ Free Facility;
 Cited by
Establishing Sprinkling Requirements on Trailers Transporting Market Weight Pigs in Warm and Hot Weather, Animals, 2014, 4, 2, 164  crossref(new windwow)
Establishing Bedding Requirements during Transport and Monitoring Skin Temperature during Cold and Mild Seasons after Transport for Finishing Pigs, Animals, 2014, 4, 2, 241  crossref(new windwow)
Establishing Bedding Requirements on Trailers Transporting Market Weight Pigs in Warm Weather, Animals, 2014, 4, 3, 476  crossref(new windwow)
Bayne, K. 1996. Revised guide for the care and use of laboratory animals available. American Physiological Society. Physiologist 39:199.

Chapman, L., T. Folks, D. Salomon, A. Patterson, T. Eggerman and P. Noguchi. 1995. Xenotransplantation and xenogeneic infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 333:1498-1501. crossref(new window)

Chatterjee, S. and A. Hadi. 2006. Regression analysis by example. John Wiley and Sons.

Chen, P. and C. White. 2006. Comparison of rectal, microchip transponder, and infrared thermometry techniques for obtaining body temperature in the laboratory rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 45:57-63.

Coates, M. 1975. Gnotobiotic animals in research: their uses and limitations. Lab. Anim. 9:275. crossref(new window)

Dollberg, S., Y. Xi and M. Donnelly. 1993. A noninvasive transcutaneous alternative to rectal thermometry for continuous measurement of core temperature in the piglet. Pediatr. Res. 34:512. crossref(new window)

Goodwin, S. 1998. Comparison of body temperatures of goats, horses, and sheep measured with a tympanic infrared thermometer, an implantable microchip transponder, and a rectal thermometer. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 37:51.

Greenes, D. and G. Fleisher. 2001. Accuracy of a noninvasive temporal artery thermometer for use in infants. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 155:376. crossref(new window)

Loughmiller, J., M. Spire, S. Dritz, B. Fenwick, M. Hosni and S.Hogge. 2001. Relationship between mean body surface temperature measured by use of infrared thermography and ambient temperature in clinically normal pigs and pigs inoculated with Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae. Am. J. Vet. Res. 62:676-681. crossref(new window)

Meyer, R., E. Bohl and E. Kohler. 1964. Procurement and Maintenance of Germ-Free Swine for Microbiological Investigations 1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 12:295-300.

Newsom, D., G. Bolgos, L. Colby and J. Nemzek. 2004.Comparison of body surface temperature measurement and conventional methods for measuring temperature in the mouse. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 43:13.

Ng, D., C. Chan, R. Lee and L. Leung. 2005. Non-contact infrared thermometry temperature measurement for screening fever in children. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics: Int. Child Health 25:267-275. crossref(new window)

Saegusa, Y. and H. Tabata. 2003. Usefulness of infrared thermometry in determining body temperature in mice. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 12:1365-1367.

Thoresen, M., M. Simmonds, S. Satas, J. Tooley and I. Silver. 2001. Effective selective head cooling during posthypoxic hypothermia in newborn piglets. Pediat. Res. 49:594. crossref(new window)

Tucker, A., C. Belcher, B. Moloo, J. Bell, T. Mazzulli, A. Humar,A. Hughes, P. McArdle and A. Talbot. 2002. The production of transgenic pigs for potential use in clinical xenotransplantation: microbiological evaluation. Xenotransplantation 9:191-202. crossref(new window)

Yuan, L., L. Ward, B. Rosen, T. To and L. Saif. 1996. Systematic and intestinal antibody-secreting cell responses and correlates of protective immunity to human rotavirus in a gnotobiotic pig model of disease. J. Virol. 70:3075-3083.