JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Evaluation of Chemical Composition and In vitro Digestibility of Appennine Pasture Plants Using Yak (Bos grunniens) Rumen Fluid or Faecal Extract as Inoculum Source
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Evaluation of Chemical Composition and In vitro Digestibility of Appennine Pasture Plants Using Yak (Bos grunniens) Rumen Fluid or Faecal Extract as Inoculum Source
Tufarelli, V.; Cazzato, E.; Ficco, A.; Laudadio, V.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Pastures of the Apennines of Central Italy contribute to feed resources of high altitude (above 1,300 m sea level) grazing systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of faecal extract from the yak (Bos grunnienes) as an alternative microbial inoculum to rumen fluid for estimation of digestibility of several forage species. Forage samples produced at high altitude were tested in this study: four legumes (Lathyrus sativus L., Lotus corniculatus L., Onobrychis viciaefolia L. and Trifolium pratense L.), three forbs (Achillea millefolium L., Potentilla reptans L. and Teucrium flavum L.) and one grass (Brachipodyum pinnatum L.) were incubated with yak rumen fluid or faecal extract. A large variability in chemical composition was observed among the species collected. Rumen liquor and faecal samples were collected from adult healthy yak. The incubator was used to evaluate the nutrient digestibility of forages using rumen liquor as control and faecal extract as alternative microbial inoculum sources. Filter bags containing samples of browse species were added to the four digestion vessels along with their respective inoculum and then incubated for 48 h and dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP), neutral and detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility was determined. There was a significant relationship between estimates, indicating that faecal liquor has the potential to be used instead of rumen fluid for estimation of in vitro digestibility of plants. It is concluded that the incubator results are appropriate for the determination of in vitro digestibility of nutrients using faecal liquor to define the potential for adaptation of yak to new pastures.
 Keywords
Yak;Pasture Quality;Faecal Extract;In vitro Digestibility;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Evaluating agro-industrial by-products as dietary roughage source on growth performance of fattening steers, Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2015, 22, 5, 580  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Partial replacements of Stylosanthes scabra forage for lucerne in total mixed ration diet of Saanen goats, Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2015, 47, 7, 1391  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Dose-response and inclusion effects of pure natural extracts and synthetic compounds on in vitro methane production, Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2016, 218, 100  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Potency of microbial inocula from bovine faeces and rumen fluid for in vitro digestion of different tropical forage substrates, Grass and Forage Science, 2012, 67, 2, 263  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Adesogan, A. T. 2005. Effect of bag type on the apparent digestibility of feeds in ANKOM DaisyII incubators. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 119:333-344. crossref(new window)

2.
AOAC. 2000. Official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 17th ed. Arlington, VA, USA.

3.
Bovolenta, S., M. Spanghero, S. Dovier, D. Orlandi and F. Clementel. 2008. Chemical composition and net energy content of alpine pasture species during the grazing season. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146:178-191. crossref(new window)

4.
Dong, Q. M., X. Q. Zhao, Y. S. Ma, S. X. Xu and Q. Y. Li. 2006. Live-weight gain, apparent digestibility, and economic benefits of yaks fed different diets during winter on the Tibetan plateau. Livest. Sci. 101:199-207. crossref(new window)

5.
Goering, H. K. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analyses (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.

6.
Holden, L. A. 1999. Comparison of methods of in vitro dry matter digestibility for ten feeds. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1791-1794. crossref(new window)

7.
Lattimer, J. M., S. R. Cooper, D. W. Freeman and D. L. Lalman. 2007. Effect of yeast culture on in vitro fermentation of a highconcentrate or high-fiber diet using equine fecal inoculum in a DaisyII incubator. J. Anim. Sci. 85:2484-2491. crossref(new window)

8.
Laudadio, V., G. M. Lacalandra, D. Monaco, T. Khorchani, M. Hammadi and V. Tufarelli. 2009. Faecal liquor as alternative microbial inoculum source for in vitro (DaisyII) technique to estimate the digestibility of feeds for camels. J. Camelid Sci. 2:1-7.

9.
Mabjeesh, S. J., M. Cohen and A. Arieli. 2000. In vitro methods for measuring the dry matter digestibility of ruminant feedstuffs: Comparison of methods and inoculum source. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2289-2294. crossref(new window)

10.
Mauricio, R. M., E. Owen, F. L. Mould, I. Givens, M. K. Theodorou, J. France, D. R. Davies and M. S. Dhanoa. 2001. Comparison of bovine rumen liquor and bovine faeces as inoculum for an in vitro gas production technique for evaluating forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 89:33-48. crossref(new window)

11.
Minson, D. J. 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press Inc. San Diego, USA.

12.
Murray, J. M. D., A. Longland and C. Dunnett. 2008. Effect of yeast supplementation on the in vitro fermentation of hightemperature dried lucerne incubated with an equine faecal inoculum. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 146:149-159. crossref(new window)

13.
National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th rev. ed. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.

14.
Omed, H. M., D. K. Lovett and R. F. E. Axford. 2000. Faeces as a source of microbial enzymes for estimating digestibility. In: Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition (D. I. Givens, E. Owen, H. M. Omed and R. F. E. Axford). CAB International, Wallingford.

15.
Sarkar, M., H. H. D. Meyer and B. S. Prakash. 2006. Is the yak (Poephagus grunniens L.) really a seasonal breeder? Theriogenology 65:721-730. crossref(new window)

16.
SAS. 2000. SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements through Release 8.1, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

17.
Spanghero, M., S. Boccalon, L. Gracco and L. Gruber. 2003. NDF degradability of hays measured in situ and in vitro. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 104:201-208. crossref(new window)

18.
Tilley, J. M. and R. A. Terry. 1963. A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. J. Br. Grassl. Soc. 18:104-111. crossref(new window)

19.
Tufarelli, V., E. Cazzato, A. Ficco and V. Laudadio. 2010. Assessing nutritional value and in vitro digestibility of Mediterranean pasture species using yak (Bos grunniens) faeces as alternative microbial inoculum in a $Daisy^{II}$ incubator. J. Food Agric. Environ. 8:477-481.

20.
Van Soest, P. J. and J. B. Robertson. 1985. Analysis of forages and fibrous feeds. In: Laboratory Manual for Animal Science 613. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

21.
Van Soest, P. J., J. B. Robertson and B. A. Lewis. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci. 74:3583-3592. crossref(new window)

22.
Varadyova, Z., M. Baran and I. Zelenak. 2005. Comparison of two in vitro fermentation gas production methods using both rumen fluid and faecal inoculum from sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 123-124:81-94.

23.
Wilman, D. and A. Adesogan. 2000. A comparison of filter bag methods with conventional tube methods of determining the in vitro digestibility of forages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 84:33-47. crossref(new window)