JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Short-term Water Restriction on Body Weight, Egg Production, and Immune Response of Local and Commercial Layers in the Late Phase of Production
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Short-term Water Restriction on Body Weight, Egg Production, and Immune Response of Local and Commercial Layers in the Late Phase of Production
Ahmed, A.S.; Alamer, M.A.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Forty-five Hisex commercial layers and forty-five local Saudi breed layers were used to determine the acceptable limit of short-term water restriction in the late phase of production, when the problem of high feed and water consumption is expected. The experiment was performed under hot and arid environmental conditions when the layers were at fifty weeks of age. Layers from each breed were randomly assigned in groups of five into nine floor pens. The average environmental temperature was 37.2-, and the relative humidity was between 20 to 37%. The trial was divided into 3 periods; control (1 week), water restriction (2 weeks) and rehydration (1 week). During the restriction period, layers from each breed were divided into three groups that received 20, 40, and 0% restriction of drinking water relative to their consumed water during the control period. During the study, feed and water consumption, body weight, changes in body weight, egg production, primary antibody response to SRBC, and rectal temperature were evaluated. Water restriction did not result in any clear effect on feed intake in either breed, however, commercial layers tended to consume less feed compared to the local breed. Body weight declined with water restriction during the first week of restriction in the commercial breed regardless of rate of restriction, but it was delayed until the second week in the local breed. Water restriction of 40% decreased egg production in both breeds but with a delay of 1 week in the local breed. Antibody level to SRBC was not affected by water restriction in the commercial line while it was highly affected in the local breed. A water restriction of 20% is considered to be an acceptable limit under the current experimental conditions without a negative effect on egg production in both breeds and considering the immune status of the local breed. Whereas, 40% restriction had a negative effect on egg production, and varied effects in the other traits in both breeds.
 Keywords
Water Restriction;Body Weight;Egg Production;Immune Response;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Effects of Water Restriction on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Organ Weights of Naked Neck and Ovambo Chickens of Southern Africa,;;

Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014. vol.27. 7, pp.974-980 crossref(new window)
1.
Effects of Water Restriction on the Growth Performance, Carcass Characteristics and Organ Weights of Naked Neck and Ovambo Chickens of Southern Africa, Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014, 27, 7, 974  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Effect of short-term water restriction in hot season on some blood parameters and immune response to Newcastle disease vaccine of local and commercial layers in the late phase of production, Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 2012, 96, 4, 717  crossref(new windwow)
3.
Haematological and serum biochemical responses of chickens to hydric stress, animal, 2013, 7, 09, 1517  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Physicochemical properties of breast meat from water-stressed naked-neck and Ovambo chickens, British Poultry Science, 2014, 55, 2, 197  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Abdelsamie, R. E. and F. Yadiwilo. 1981. Water consumption and effects of water restriction on performance of broilers in the tropics. Br. Poult. Sci. 22:423-429. crossref(new window)

2.
Arad, Z. 1982. Effect of water deprivation and heat exposure on body weight loss and drinking capacity in four breeds of fowl (Gallus Domesticus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 73A:297-299.

3.
Arad, Z. 1983. Thermoregulation and acid-base status in the panting dehydrated fowl. J. Appl. Physiol. 54:234-243.

4.
Arad, Z. and E. Skadhauge. 1984. Plasma hormones (arginine vasotocin, prolactin, aldosterone, and corticosterone) in relation to hydration state, NaCl intake, and egg laying in fowls. J. Exp. Zool. 322:707-714.

5.
Beuving, G., R. B. Jones and H. J. Blokhius. 1989. Adrenocortical and heterophil/lymphocyte responses to challenge in hens showing short or long tonic immobility reactions. Br. Poult. Sci. 30:175-184. crossref(new window)

6.
Dai, N. V., W. Bessei and Z. Nasir. 2009. The effect of potassium chloride supplementation in drinking water on water and feed intake and egg production quality of laying hens under cyclic heat stress. Archiv. Fur. Geflugelkunde 73:179-188.

7.
Esonu, B. O. 2000. Animal nutrition and feeding. A functional approach. lst edn. R and R Books. Owerri, Nigeria, pp. 131-179.

8.
Freier, D. O. and B. A. Fuchs. 1994. A mechanism of action for morphine-induced immunosuppression: Corticosterone mediates morphine-induced suppression of natural killer cell activity. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 270:1127-1133.

9.
Fujita, M., M. Ohya and S. Yamamoto. 2001. Effects of water restriction on productive performances, excreta moisture, drinking behavior and hematological aspect of laying hens. Jap. J. Livest. Manag. 37:63-68.

10.
Heller, E. D., G. Leitner, N. Drabkin and D. Melamed. 1990. Passive immunization of chicks against Escherichia coli. Avian Pathol. 19:345-354. crossref(new window)

11.
Huff, G. R., W. E. Huff, N. C. Rath, N. B. Anthony and K. E. Nestor. 2008. Effects of Escherichia coli challenge and transport stress on hematology and serum chemistry values of three genetic lines of Turkeys. Poult. Sci. 87:2234-2241. crossref(new window)

12.
Kellerup, S. U., J. E. Parker and G. H. Arscott. 1965. Effect of restricted water consumption on broilers chickens. Poult. Sci. 44:79-83.

13.
Lewis, D. F. W. and M. N. Jacobs. 2002. Steroid hormone receptors and dietary ligands: A selected review. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 61:105-122. crossref(new window)

14.
Li, H., Y. Zhang, Z. H. Ning, X. M. Deng, Z. X. Lian and N. Li. 2008. Effect of selection for phagocytosis in dwarf chickens on immune and reproductive characters. Poult. Sci. 87:41-49. crossref(new window)

15.
Odihambo Mumma, J., J. P. Thaxton, Y. Vizzier-Thaxton and W. L. Dodson. 2006. Physiological stress in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 85:761-769. crossref(new window)

16.
Puvadolpirod, S. and J. P. Thaxton. 2000. Model of physiological stress in chickens. 2. Dosimetry of adrenocorticotropin. Poult. Sci. 79:370-376. crossref(new window)

17.
Redei, E. E. 2008. Molecular genetics of the stress-responsive adrenocortical axis. Ann. Med. 40:139-148. crossref(new window)

18.
SAS Institute. 2000. SAS/STAT User's Guide, statistics SAS institute Inc. Cary, USA.

19.
Savory, C. J. 1978. The relationship between food and water intake and the effects of water restriction on laying brown Leghorn hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 19:631-641. crossref(new window)

20.
Scheele, C. W. 1997. Pathological changes in metabolism of poultry related to increasing production levels. Vet. Q. 19:127-130. crossref(new window)

21.
Siegel, H. S. 1995. Stress, strains and resistance. Br. Poult. Sci. 36:3-22. crossref(new window)

22.
Skadhauge, E. 1981. Osmoregulaion in birds. Springer-Verlag, New York USA.

23.
Teresa Herr Viola, Andrea Machado Leal Ribeiro, Antonio Mario Penz Junior and Eduardo Spillari Viola. 2009. Influence of water restriction on the performance and organ development of young broiler. R. Bras. Zootec. 38:323-327.

24.
Viola, T. H, A. M. Ribeiro, A. M. Junior and E. S. Viola. 2009. Influence of water restriction on the performance and organ development of young broilers. R. Bras. Zootec. 38: 323-327.