JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Variance Components and Genetic Parameters Estimated for Fat and Protein Content in Individual Months of Lactation: The Case of Tsigai Sheep
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Variance Components and Genetic Parameters Estimated for Fat and Protein Content in Individual Months of Lactation: The Case of Tsigai Sheep
Oravcova, Marta;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess variance components and genetic parameters for fat and protein content in Tsigai sheep using multivariate animal models in which fat and protein content in individual months of lactation were treated as different traits, and univariate models in which fat and protein content were treated as repeated measures of the same traits. Test day measurements were taken between the second and the seventh month of lactation. The fixed effects were lactation number, litter size and days in milk. The random effects were animal genetic effect and permanent environmental effect of ewe. The effect of flock-year-month of test day measurement was fitted either as a fixed (FYM) or random (fym) effect. Heritabilities for fat content were estimated between 0.06 and 0.17 (FYM fitted) and between 0.06 and 0.11 (fym fitted). Heritabilities for protein content were estimated between 0.15 and 0.23 (FYM fitted) and between 0.10 and 0.18 (fym fitted). For fat content, variance ratios of permanent environmental effect of ewe were estimated between 0.04 and 0.11 (FYM fitted) and between 0.02 and 0.06 (fym fitted). For protein content, variance ratios of permanent environmental effect of ewe were estimated between 0.13 and 0.20 (FYM fitted) and between 0.08 and 0.12 (fym fitted). The proportion of phenotypic variance explained by fym effect ranged from 0.39 to 0.43 for fat content and from 0.25 to 0.36 for protein content. Genetic correlations between individual months of lactation ranged from 0.74 to 0.99 (fat content) and from 0.64 to 0.99 (protein content). Fat content heritabilities estimated with univariate animal models roughly corresponded with heritability estimates from multivariate models: 0.13 (FYM fitted) and 0.07 (fym fitted). Protein content heritabilities estimated with univariate animal models also corresponded with heritability estimates from multivariate models: 0.18 (FYM fitted) and 0.13 (fym fitted).
 Keywords
Sheep;Milk Composition;Test Day Model;Variance Ratios;Heritability;Genetic Correlations;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Ali, T. E. and L. R. Schaeffer. 1987. Accounting for covariances among test day milk yields in dairy cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 67:637-644. crossref(new window)

2.
Baro, J. A., J. A. Carriedo, and F. San Primitivo. 1994. Genetic parameters of test day measures for somatic cell count, milk yield, and protein percentage of milking ewes. J. Dairy Sci. 77:2658-2662. crossref(new window)

3.
Bauer, J., M. Milerski, J. Pribyl, and L. Vostry. 2012. Estimation of genetic parameters and evaluation of test-day milk production in sheep. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 57:522-528.

4.
Groeneveld, E., M. Kovac, and N. Mielenz. 2010. VCE User's Guide and Reference Manual, version 6.0. Institute of Farm Animal Genetics, Neustadt, Germany.

5.
International Committee for Animal Recording. 2011. International Agreement of Recording Practices: Guidelines Approved by the General Assembly Held in Riga, Latvia, June 2010. International Committee for Animal Recording, Rome, Italy.

6.
Komprej, A., G. Gorjanc, D. Kompan, and M. Kovac. 2009. Covariance components by a repeatability model in Slovenian dairy sheep using test-day records. Czech J. Anim. Sci. 54:426-434.

7.
Komprej, A., D. Kompan, and M. Kovac. 2011. Genetic and environmental dispersion parameter estimation by test interval method in dairy sheep. Acta Agric. Slov. 98:5-13.

8.
Oravcova, M., E. Groeneveld, M. Kovac, D. Peskovicova, and M. Margetin. 2005. Estimation of genetic and environmental parameters of milk production traits in Slovak purebred sheep using test- day model. Small Rumin. Res. 56:113-120. crossref(new window)

9.
Oravcova, M. and D. Peskovicova. 2008. Genetic and environmental trends for milk production traits in sheep estimated with test-day model. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 21:1088-1096. crossref(new window)

10.
Oravcova, M. 2014. Variance components and genetic parameters estimated for daily milk yield in individual months of lactation: the case of Tsigai sheep. Vet. Med. Zoot. 68:55-59.

11.
SAS Institute Inc. 2009. SAS/STAT User's Guide: Version 9.2. 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

12.
Serrano, M., E. Ugarte, J. J. Jurado, M. D. Perez-Guzman, and A. Legarra. 2001. Test day models and genetic parameters in Latxa and Manchega dairy ewes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 67:253-264. crossref(new window)

13.
Slovak Standards Institute. 1995. Determination of milk composition by infrared absorption instrument (STN 57 0536). Slovak Standards Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia.

14.
Swalve, H. H. 1995. The effect of test day models on the estimation of genetic parameters and breeding values for dairy yield traits. J. Dairy Sci. 78:929-938. crossref(new window)

15.
Volanis, M., A. Kominakis, and E. Rogdakis. 2002. Genetic analysis of udder score and milk traits in test day records of Sfakia dairy ewes. Arch. Tierz. 45:69-77.