Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Characteristics of Sawdust and Cocopeat Beddings, and Their Usefulness According to the Fan and Pen Location for Rearing Hanwoo Cattle
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Characteristics of Sawdust and Cocopeat Beddings, and Their Usefulness According to the Fan and Pen Location for Rearing Hanwoo Cattle
Ahn, Gyu Chul; Jang, Sun Sik; Lee, Kang Yeon; Kwak, Wan Sup; Oh, Young Kyun; Park, Keun Kyu;
  PDF(new window)
This study was designed to examine the characteristics of sawdust and cocopeat bedding materials, including physicochemical properties (Exp. I) and on-farm trial (Exp. II). In Exp. I, the proportion of particle size was in the order of sawdust>cocopeat India>cocopeat Vietnam (p<0.05), and cocopeat contained higher proportion of small particles (+below ) than sawdust, causing a dust production problem. Bulk density was cocopeat India>cocopeat Vietnam>sawdust (p<0.05), thus cocopeat treatments showed 4.4 times higher bedding cost than sawdust. The water absorption rates were 702.0% in cocopeat India, 678.3% in cocopeat Vietnam, and 444.0% in sawdust, showing cocopeat had approximately 1.5 times higher water absorption rate than sawdust. Moisture evaporation rates after 12 h of air blowing (2.00 m/s) were higher (p<0.05) in cocopeat Vietnam (80.4%) than sawdust (71.2%) and cocopeat India (72.8%). In vitro ammonia emissions were higher (p<0.05) in sawdust () than cocopeat India () and Vietnam (), and total ammonia emissions were higher (p<0.05) in sawdust () than cocopeat India () and Vietnam (). In Exp. II, an on-farm trial was conducted with 48 Hanwoo cattle in 16 pens using the same bedding materials as in Exp. I, with fan (blowing 2.00 m/s) and no fan treatments, and feed bunk side (FB) and water supply side (WS) within a pen (4.5 m, , length). Beddings were replaced with fresh bedding materials when moisture concentrations were over 65%. No interactions among treatments were detected for moisture concentration and increment rates, and ammonia concentrations, but a significant effect was observed (p<0.01) for each of the treatments. Both concentrations and increment rate of moisture were higher (p<0.01) in the beddings without fan than with fan. Moisture concentrations and increment rate within a pen were also higher (p<0.01) in FB than WS. Thus, the whole no-fan-FB and sawdust-fan-FB were replaced with fresh bedding material between 4 to 5 experimental weeks. The ammonia concentrations and pH of beddings were not significantly different among treatments. Therefore, using cocopeat bedding with a blowing fan can extend twice the bedding utilization period, and WS within a pen showed twice the bedding-life compared to FB. Despite the outstanding characteristics of cocopeat compared with sawdust, using cocopeat as an alternative for sawdust bedding is not recommended for cattle management, considering it has 4.4 times higher bedding cost and a dust production problem.
Animal Welfare;Bedding;Sawdust;Cocopeat;Ammonia Emission;Cattle;
 Cited by
Characteristics of Rice Hulls, Sawdust, Wood Shavings and Mixture of Sawdust and Wood Shavings, and Their Usefulness According to the Pen Location for Hanwoo Cattle,;;;;;;

아세아태평양축산학회지, 2016. vol.29. 4, pp.599-605 crossref(new window)
Archibeque, S. L., H. C. Freetly, N. A. Cole, and C. L. Ferrell. 2007. The influence of oscillating dietary protein concentrations on finishing cattle. II. Nutrient retention and ammonia emissions. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1496-1503. crossref(new window)

Burgess, D. and W. G. Hutchinson. 2005. Do people value the welfare of farm animals? Euro Choices. 4:36-43.

Burkholder, K. M., A. D. Guyton, J. M. McKinney, and K. F. Knowlton. 2004. The effect of steam flaked or dry ground corn and supplemental phytic acid on nitrogen partitioning in lactating cows and ammonia emission from manure. J. Dairy Sci. 87:2546-2553. crossref(new window)

Chambers, B. J., J. R. Williams, S. D. Cooke, R. M. Kay, D. R. Chadwick, and S. L. Balsdon. 2003. Ammonia losses from contrasting cattle and pig manure management systems. In Agriculture, Waste and the Environment (Eds. I. McTaggart and L. Gairns). Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, UK. pp. 19-25.

Chaney, A. L. and E. P. Marbach. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Biochem. 8:130-132.

Cole, N. A., R. N. Clark, R. W. Todd, C. R. Richardson, A. Gueye, L. W. Greene, and K. McBride. 2005. Influence of dietary crude protein concentration and source on potential ammonia emissions from beef cattle manure. J. Anim. Sci. 83:722-731. crossref(new window)

Corti, C., L. Crippa, P. L. Genevini, and M. Centemero. 1998. Compost use in plant nurseries: Hydrological and physicochemical characteristics. Compost Sci. Util. 6:35-45. crossref(new window)

Hillman, P., K. Gebremedhin, and R. Warner. 1992, Ventilation system to minimize airborne bacteria, dust, humidity, and ammonia in calf nurseries. J. Dairy Sci. 75:1305-1312. crossref(new window)

Hogan, J. S., K. L. Smith, K. H. Hoblet, D. A. Todhunter, P. S. Schoenberger, W. D. Hueston, D. E. Pritchard, G. L. Bowman, L. E. Heider, B. L. Brockett, and H. R. Conrad. 1989. Bacterial counts in bedding materials used on nine commercial dairies. J. Dairy Sci. 72:250-258. crossref(new window)

Jeppsson, K. H. 1999. Volatilization of ammonia in deep-litter systems with different bedding materials for young cattle. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 73:49-57. crossref(new window)

Kang, H. S., S. K. Hong, W. M. Cho, B. H. Paek, C. H. Park, and D. S. Lee. 1995. Effects of sawdust and rice hulls litter on the waste management of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle). Korean Soc. Livest. Hous. Environ. 1:1-8.

Kim, Y. S., B. T. Kim, and C. H. Lee. 2007. Variations of physical properties depending on the height of reactor in vertical composting process. J. KORRA 15:115-124.

Kweon, D. J., U. G. Kweon, S. G. Jeong, J. D. Han, S. C. Jung, S. W. Kang, S. L. Kang, H. S. Jung, and H. J. Chang. 1995. Study on the utilization of sawdust bedding barn for dairy cows. Korean Soc. Livest. Hous. Environ. 1:117-124.

Misselbrook, T. H. and J. M. Powell. 2005. Influence of bedding material on ammonia emissions from cattle excreta. J. Dairy Sci. 88:4304-4312. crossref(new window)

Misselbrook, T. H., J. M. Powell, G. A., Broderick, and J. H. Grabber. 2005. Dietary manipulation in dairy cattle: Laboratory experiments to assess the influence on ammonia emissions. J. Dairy Sci. 88:1765-1777. crossref(new window)

National Institute of Animal Science. 2012. Korean Feeding Standard for Hanwoo. 3rd Ed. Rural Development Administration, Jeonju, Korea.

Olson, T. M. 1940. Absorptive capacity of different materials ordinarily used for bedding. J. Dairy Sci. 23:355-360. crossref(new window)

Potgieter, F. J. and P. I. Wilke. 1996. The dust content, dust generation, ammonia production, and absorption properties of three different rodent bedding types. Lab. Anim. 30:79-87. crossref(new window)

RSPCA (Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals). 2015. The five freedoms. Accessed September 30, 2015.

SAS User's guide. 2002. Statistics, Version 9.01 Edition. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary. NC, USA.

Scholtens, R. 1990. Measurements of ammonia emission in mechanically ventilated animal houses. VDI/KTBLSymposium, Ammoniak in der Umwelt. Kreislaufe, Wirkungen, Minderung. 20.1-20.9.

Swierstra, D., M. C. J. Smits, and W. Kroodsma. 1995. Ammonia emission from cubicle houses for cattle with slatted and solid floors. J. Agric. Eng. Res. 62:127-132. crossref(new window)

Tucker, C. B., D. M. Weary, and D. Fraser. 2003. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 86:521-529. crossref(new window)

Ward, P. L., J. E. Wohlt, P. K. Zajac, and K. R. Cooper. 2000. Chemical and physical properties of processed newspaper compared to wheat straw and wood shavings as animal bedding. J. Dairy Sci. 83:359-367. crossref(new window)

Webster, A. J. F. 1993. Understanding the Dairy Cow. 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

Wikipidea. 2015., Accessed 1 July, 2015.