Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Floor Space Allowance on Pig Productivity across Stages of Growth: A Field-scale Analysis
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Floor Space Allowance on Pig Productivity across Stages of Growth: A Field-scale Analysis
Lee, Joon H.; Choi, Hong L.; Heo, Yong J.; Chung, Yoon P.;
  PDF(new window)
A total of 152 pig farms were randomly selected from the five provinces in South Korea. During the experiment, the average temperature and relative humidity was and 74% in summer and and 53% in winter, respectively. The correlation between floor space allowance (FSA) and productivity index was analyzed, including non-productive sow days (NPD), number of weaners (NOW), survival rate (SR), appearance rate of A-grade pork (ARA), and days at a slaughter weight of 110 kg (d-SW) at different growth stages. The objectives of the present study were i) to determine the effect of FSA on the pig productivity index and ii) to suggest the minimum FSA for pigs based on scientific baseline data. For the pregnant sow, NPD could be decreased if pregnant sows were raised with a medium level (M) of FSA (3.10 to ) while also keeping the pig house clean which improves hygiene, and operating the ventilation system properly. For the farrowing sows, the NOW tended to decrease as the FSA increased. Similarly, a high level of FSA (H) is significantly negative with weaner SR of farrowing sows (p-value = 0.017), indicating this FSA tends to depress SR. Therefore, a FSA of 2.30 to (very low) could be appropriate for weaners because a limited space can provide a sense of security and protection from external interruptions. The opposite trend was observed that an increase in floor space (> leads to increase the SR of growing pigs. For the fattening pigs, H level of FSA was negatively correlated with SR, but M level of FSA was positively correlated with SR, indicating that SR tended to increase with the FSA of 1.10 to . In contrast, ARA of male fattening pigs showed opposite results. H level of FSA (1.27 to ) was suggested to increase productivity because ARA was most affected by H level of space allowance with positive correlation (). The relationship between the FSA and d-SW of fattening pigs was hard to identify because of the low value. However, the farms that provided a relatively large floor space (1.27 to ) during the winter period showed d-SW was significantly and negatively affected by FSA.
Floor Space Allowance;Pig Productivity;Performance;Field-scale Analysis;
 Cited by
Gentry, J. G., J. J. McGlone, J. R. Blanton, Jr., and M. F. Miller. 2002. Impact of spontaneous exercise on performance, meat quality, and muscle fiber characteristics of growing/finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 80:2833-2839. crossref(new window)

Gonyou, H. W. and W. R. Stricklin. 1998. Effects of floor area allowance and group size on the productivity of growing/finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76:1326-1330. crossref(new window)

Gonyou, H. W., M. C. Brumm, E. Bush, J. Deen, S. A. Edwards, T. Fangman, J. J. McGlone, M. Meunier-Salaun, R. B. Morrison, H. Spoolder, P. L. Sundberg, and A. K. Johnson. 2006. Application of broken-line analysis to assess floor space requirements of nursery and grower-finisher pigs expressed on an allometric basis. J. Anim. Sci. 84:229-235. crossref(new window)

Hyun, Y., M. Ellis, and R. W. Johnson. 1998. Effects of feeder type, space allowance, and mixing on the growth performance and feed intake pattern of growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 76:2771-2778. crossref(new window)

Jenen, T., C. Kold Nielsen, J. Vinther, and R. B. D'Eath. 2012. The effect of space allowance for finishing pigs on productivity and pen hygiene. Livest. Sci. 149:33-40. crossref(new window)

MIFAFF. 2005. Statistics. The Ministry of Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Gwacheon, Republic of Korea

Morrison, R. S., L. J. Johnston, and A. M. Hilbrands. 2007. The behaviour, welfare, growth performance and meat quality of pigs housed in a deep-litter, large group housing system compared to a conventional confinement system. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103:12-24. crossref(new window)

Powell, T. A. and M. C. Brumm. 1992. Economics of space allocation for grower-finisher hogs. J. Farm Mngs. Rural Appr. 56:67-72.

Suwanasopee, T., J. W. Mabry, S. Koonawootrittriron, P. Sopannarath, and S. Tumwasorn. 2005. Estimated genetic parameters of non-productive sow days related to litter size in swine raised in Thailand. Thai J. Agric. Sci. 38:87-93.

Salak-Johnson, J. L., S. R. Niekamp, S. L. Rodriguez-Zas, M. Ellis, and S. E. Curtis. 2007. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: Body condition, skin lesions, and performance. J. Anim. Sci. 85:1758-1769. crossref(new window)

Shaw, D. W. 2005. Minimizing non-productive sow days. The Ohio State University Extension. Veterinary Medicine Newsletter. Vol. 23. Accessed January 7, 2005.

Street, B. R. and H. W. Gonyou. 2008. Effects of housing finishing pigs in two group sizes and at two floor space allocations on production, health, behavior, and physiological variables. J. Anim. Sci. 86:982-991. crossref(new window)

The Council of the European Union. 2001. The Council of The European Union. Council Directive 2001/88/EC of 23 October 2001 amending Directive 91/630/EEC laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Accessed August 17, 2014.

Turner, S. P., M. Ewen, J. A. Rooke, and S. A. Edwards. 2000. The effect of space allowance on performance, aggression and immune competence of growing pigs housed on straw deeplitter at different group sizes. Livest. Prod. Sci. 66:47-55 crossref(new window)

Weng, R. C., S. A. Edwards, and P. R. English. 1998. Behaviour, social interactions and lesion scores of group-housed sows in relation to floor space allowance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 59:307-316. crossref(new window)

Young, M. G., M. D. Tokach, F. X. Aherne, S. S. Dritz, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, and T. M. Loughin. 2008. Effect of space allowance during rearing and selection criteria on performance of gilts over three parities in a commercial swine production system. J. Anim. Sci. 86:3181-3193. crossref(new window)