A Robust and Computationally Efficient Optimal Design Algorithm of Electromagnetic Devices Using Adaptive Response Surface Method

Title & Authors
A Robust and Computationally Efficient Optimal Design Algorithm of Electromagnetic Devices Using Adaptive Response Surface Method
Zhang, Yanli; Yoon, Hee-Sung; Shin, Pan-Seok; Koh, Chang-Seop;

Abstract
This paper presents a robust and computationally efficient optimal design algorithm for electromagnetic devices by combining an adaptive response surface approximation of the objective function and($\small{1+{\lambda}}$) evolution strategy. In the adaptive response surface approximation, the design space is successively reduced with the iteration, and Pareto-optimal sampling points are generated by using Latin hypercube design with the Max Distance and Min Distance criteria. The proposed algorithm is applied to an analytic example and TEAM problem 22, and its robustness and computational efficiency are investigated.
Keywords
Adaptive Response Surface Method;Latin Hypercube Design;Optimal Design;Pareto Optimization;
Language
English
Cited by
1.
Utilizing Kriging Surrogate Models for Multi-Objective Robust Optimization of Electromagnetic Devices, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2014, 50, 2, 693
2.
Comparative Study on Kriging Surrogate Models for Metaheuristic Optimization of Multidimensional Electromagnetic Problems, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2015, 51, 3, 1
3.
A Numerically Efficient Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm: Combination of Dynamic Taylor Kriging and Differential Evolution, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2015, 51, 3, 1
4.
A Robust Global Optimization Algorithm of Electromagnetic Devices Utilizing Gradient Index and Multi-Objective Optimization Method, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2011, 47, 5, 1254
5.
An Optimal Design of Large Scale Permanent Magnet Pole Shape Using Adaptive Response Surface Method With Latin Hypercube Sampling Strategy, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2009, 45, 3, 1214
6.
Co-Kriging Assisted PSO Algorithm and Its Application to Optimal Transposition Design of Power Transformer Windings for the Reduction of Circulating Current Loss, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2016, 52, 3, 1
7.
A Global Optimization Algorithm for Electromagnetic Devices by Combining Adaptive Taylor Kriging and Particle Swarm Optimization, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2013, 49, 5, 2061
References
1.
S. Rippa, "An algorithm for selecting a good value for the parameter c in radial basis function interpolation," Advances in Computational Mathematics, vol. 11, pp. 193-210, 1999

2.
L. Wang and D. Lowther, "Selection of approximation models for electromagnetic device optimization," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 1227-1230, Apr. 2006

3.
S. L. Ho et al., "A RSM based on improved compactly supported radial bases function and its application to rapid optimizations of electromagnetic devices," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 2111-2117, Jun. 2005

4.
J. Webb, "Construction of device performance models using adaptive interpolation and sensitivities," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1768-1771, May 2005

5.
X. K. Gao et al., "Robust design for torque optimization using response surface methodology," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1141-1144, Mar. 2002

6.
D. Han and A. Chatterjee, "Adaptive response surface modeling-based method for analog circuit sizing," Proceedings of IEEE International SOC Conference, 2004, pp. 109-112

7.
Y. Yao, C. S. Koh, S. Yang, and G. Ni, "A Global Optimization algorithm based on $C^1$ piecewise response surface patches," IEEE Trans. on Magn., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1629-1632, Apr. 2007

8.
S. L. Ho, P. H. Ni, S. Y. Yang, and K. F. Wong, "An adaptive interpolating moving least squares response surface model applied to the design optimizations of electromagnetic devices," Proc. of CEFC, 2006, pp. 59

9.
J. R. Koehler and A. B. Owen, Computer Experiments, Handbook of Statistics, Elsevier Science, New York, 1996, pp. 261-308

10.
B. Brandstaetter, "SMES optimization benchmark, TEAM problem 22, 3 parameter problem," http://www.igte.tu-graz.ac.at/archive/team_new/team3.php

11.
R. H. C. Takahashi, J. A. Vasconcelos, J. A. Ramirez, and L. Krahenbuhl, "A multiobjective methodology for evaluating genetic operators," IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 39, pp. 1321-1324, May 2003