JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Perception Based Definition of Construction Quality in Pakistan
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Perception Based Definition of Construction Quality in Pakistan
Awan, Muhammad Yousaf Sadiq; Awan, Dr Muhammad Maqbool Sadiq;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
The complexity arises in defining the construction quality due to its perception, based on inherent market conditions and their requirements, the diversified stakeholders itself and their desired output. A quantitative survey based approach was adopted in this constructive study. A questionnaire based survey was conducted, for the assessment of construction quality perception and expectations in the context of quality improvement technique. The survey feedback of professionals, from the leading construction organizations/companies of Pakistan were analyzed. The financial capacity, organizational structure, and construction experience of the construction firms formed basis for their selection. After statistical analysis of survey feedback it was found reliable and valid for the inferential purpose to the target population of construction professionals. The quality perception was found to be project scope oriented, considered as an excess cost for a construction project and keeping the rework minimum by qualifying the required quality tests, keeping the defects minimum by ensuring the specifications of supplied material. Any quality improvement technique was expected to address the financial aspects of the construction project for the employer and contractor, by increasing the profitability through reduction in overall cost, reduction in time, reduction in defects and improving the productivity in a construction project. The study is beneficial for the construction professionals to assess the prevailing construction quality perception and the expectations from implementation of any quality improvement technique in construction projects.
 Keywords
Construction Quality;Perception;Expectations;Improvement Technique;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Advice, E. & Checks, F., 1999. survey implementation, sampling, and weighting data.

2.
Al-tmeemy, S.M.H., Rahman, H.A.- & Harun, Z., 2012. Contractors' perception of the use of costs of quality system in Malaysian building construction projects. JPMA, 30(7), pp.827-838.

3.
Atkinson, D.E. et al., 2006. Canadian cryospheric response to an anomalous warm summer: A synthesis of the climate change action fund project "the state of the arctic cryosphere during the extreme warm summer of 1998." Atmosphere- Ocean, 44(4), pp.347-375. crossref(new window)

4.
Brazier, E. et al., 1992. GENERAL PRACTICE Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire : new outcome, 305(July), pp.160-164.

5.
Chan, K.M.A. et al., 2006. Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services. , 4(11).

6.
Chase, T.N., Sr, R.A.P. & Castro, C., 2003. 1 \ Re Present Day Climate Simulations Accurate For Reliable Regional Downscaling ? Enough. Universities Council on Water Resources, 124, p.26-34, pp.26-34.

7.
Chung, K.-J. & Huang, T.-S., 2007. An optimal production run length with imperfect production process and nondecreasing percentage defective proportion. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 28(4), pp.653-661. crossref(new window)

8.
Heravitorbati, A. et al., 2011. Examination of process to develop a framework for better implementation of quality practices in building projects . , (September), pp.16-18.

9.
Hoonakker, P., Carayon, P. & Loushine, T., 2010. Barriers and benefits of quality management in the construction industry: An empirical study. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(9), pp.953-969. crossref(new window)

10.
Jaafari, a., 1996. Human Factors in the Australian Construction Industry: Towards Total Quality Management. Australian Journal of Management, 21(2), pp.159-185. crossref(new window)

11.
Kanji, G.K. & Wong, A., 1998. Quality culture in the construction industry. Total Quality Management, 9(4-5), pp.133-140.

12.
Lee, H.L., 2004. The triple-A supply chain. Harvard business review, 82(10), pp.102-12, 157.

13.
Love, P.E.D., Mandal, P. & Li, H., 1999. Determining the causal structure of rework influences in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 17(4), pp.505-517. crossref(new window)

14.
Marques de Sa, J.P., 2007. No Title 2nd ed., Springer US.

15.
Nawaz, T. & Ikram, A.A., 2013. Benefits and Impediments in Implementing Tqm in Pakistani Construction Sector., 5(4), pp.205-227.

16.
Pallant, J., 2007. SPSS Survival Manual. , (2nd), pp.90-93.

17.
Pheng, L.S. & Kwang, G.K., 2005. ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Management Systems: Integration, Costs and Benefits for Construction Companies. Architectural Science Review, 48(2), pp.145-151. crossref(new window)

18.
Pipino, L.L., Lee, Y.W. & Wang, R.Y., 2002. Data quality assessment. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), p.211. crossref(new window)

19.
Wong, A., 1999. Total quality management in the construction industry in Hong Kong: A supply chain management perspective. Total Quality Management, 10(2), pp.199-208. crossref(new window)

20.
Yusoff, W. et al., 2004. Development of quality culture in the construction industry 1. , pp.1-11.