JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Effect of Pretension on Moored Ship Response
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Effect of Pretension on Moored Ship Response
Sajjan, Sharanabasappa C.; Surendran, S.;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Moonpools are vertical wells in a floating body used onboard many types of vessels like Exploration and drilling vessels, Production barges, Cable-laying vessels, Rock dumping vessels, Research and offshore support vessels. Moonpool gives passage to underwater activities for different types of ships as per their mission requirements. It is observed that inside a moonpool considerable relative motions may occur, depending on shape, depth of the moonpool and on the frequency range of the waves to which the ship is exposed. The vessel responses are entirely different in zero and non-zero Froude number. Former situation is paid attention in this study as the mission requirement of the platform is to be in the particular location for long period of operation. It is well known that there are two modes of responses depending on the shape of the moonpool viz., piston mode for square shape and sloshing mode for rectangular shapes with different aspect ratios of opening like 1:1.5 and 1:2 ratios. Circular shaped moonpool is also tested for measuring the responses. The vessel moored using heavy lines are modelled and tested in the wave basin. The pretensions of the lines are varied by altering the touchdown points and the dynamic tensions on the lines are measured. The different modes of oscillations of water column are measured using wave gauge and the vessel response at a particular situation is determined. RAOs calculated for various situations provide better insight to the designer.
 Keywords
Moonpool;Vessel response;Piston mode;Sloshing mode;Touchdown points;Pretension;Dynamic tension;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Aalbers A.B. The water motions in a moonpool. Ocean Engineering. Vol. 11. No. 6. pp. 557-579. (1984). crossref(new window)

2.
Rameswar Bhattacharyya. Dynamics of marine vehicles, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.(1978).

3.
Day.A.H. The design of moonpools for subsea operations. Marine Technology Vol 27, No.3, May 1990, pp 167-179. (1990).

4.
English.J.W. A means of reducing the oscillations in drill wells caused by vessels forward speed. The Naval Architect pp. 88-90. (1976).

5.
Guilhem Gaillarde and Anke Cotteleer. Water motion in moonpools empirical and theoretical approach. Maritime Research Institute Netherlands MARIN.(2001).

6.
Inoue.Y and S.Surendran. Dynamics of the Interaction of Mooring Line with the Sea Bed. Proceedings of the Fourth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference Osaka, Japan. (1994).

7.
Kazuhiro Fukuda. Behavior of water in vertical well with bottom opening of ship, and its effect on ship motions, Journal of the Society of Naval Architects of Japan, Vol. 141, pp. 107-122. (1977).

8.
Kazuhiro Fukuda and Yutaro Yoshii. Flow Calculation in Vertical Cavity with Free Surface and Bottom Opening to Water Stream. Journal of the Japanese Society of Naval Architects and Ocean Engineers. pp 23-28. (2009).

9.
Molin.B. On the piston mode in moonpools. Proc. 14th Int. Workshop on water waves & floating bodies.(1999).

10.
Molin.B. On the piston and sloshing modes in moonpools. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. Vol 430, pp. 27-50. (2001). crossref(new window)

11.
Newman N. Marine Hydrodynamics. The MIT Press, Cambridge. (1977).

12.
Riaan van't Veer and Haye Jan Tholen. Added resistance of moonpools in calm water. Proceedings of the ASME 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering. OMAE2008-57246. (2008).

13.
Surendran S. Depressor Towing using Light Cables. Marine Engineering Journal Vol.70. (1989).

14.
Surendran.S and T.P.Pramod. Nonlinear analysis of a dynamically positioned platform in stochastic seaway. Ocean Engineer-ing.Vol.33, pp 878-894. (2006). crossref(new window)

15.
Surendran. S and Goutam. Reduction in the dynamic amplitudes of moored cable systems. Ships and Offshore Structures. Vol. 4, No. 2, pp 145-163. (2009). crossref(new window)