JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Damage Assessment of Free-fall Dropped Object on Sub-seabed in Offshore Operation
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
Damage Assessment of Free-fall Dropped Object on Sub-seabed in Offshore Operation
Won, Jonghwa; Kim, Youngho; Park, Jong-Sik; Kang, Hyo-dong; Joo, YoungSeok; Ryu, Mincheol;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
This paper presents the damage assessment of a free-fall dropped object on the seabed. The damage to a dropped object totally depends on the relationship between the impact energy and the soil strength at the mudline. In this study, unexpected dropping scenarios were first assumed by varying the relevant range of the impact velocity, structure geometry at the moment of impact, and soil strength profile along the penetration depth. Theoretical damage assessments were then undertaken for a free-fall dropping event with a fixed final embedment depth for the structure. This paper also describes the results of a three-dimensional large deformation finite element analysis undertaken for the purpose of validation. The analyses were carried out using the coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian approach, modifying the simple elastic-perfectly plastic Tresca soil model. The validation exercises for each dropping scenario showed good agreement, and the present numerical approach was capable of predicting the behavior of a free-fall dropped object.
 Keywords
Free-fall object;damage assessment;offshore operation;slamming;LDFE;
 Language
English
 Cited by
 References
1.
Brandao, FEN, Henriques, CCD, de Araujo, JB, Ferreira, OCG, dos Santos Amaral, C (2006). "Albacora Leste field development - FPSO P-50 mooring system concept and installation," Proc. Offshore Tech Conf, Houston, OTC18243.

2.
de Araujo, JB, Machado, RD, de Medeiros Junior, CJ (2004). "High holding power torpedo pile - results for the first long term application," Proc 23rd Int Conf Offshore Mech Arctic Eng, OMAE, Vancouver, OMAE2004-51201.

3.
DNV (2011), Modelling And Analysis Of Marine Operations, Recommended Practice DNV-RP-H103, Det Norske Veritas, 147.

4.
Fernandes, AC, de Araujo, JB, de Almeida, JCL, Machado, RD, and Matos V (2006). "Torpedo Anchor Installation Hydrodynamics," J offshore Mech Arctic Eng, ASME, 128, 286-93 crossref(new window)

5.
Hossain, MS, Kim, YH, Gaudin, C (2014), "Experimental investigation of installation and pull-out of dynamically penetrating anchors in clay and silt," J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE, 140(7), 04014026. crossref(new window)

6.
Larsen, E (2013), Impact Loads on Circular Cylinders, M.Sc. Thesis, Dept Marine Tech, NTNU, 5-24.

7.
NOPSEMA (2013). the REGULATOR, NOPSEMA, 2, 6-7.

8.
O'Loughlin, CD, Richardson, MD, Randolph, MF (2009). "Centrifuge tests on dynamically installed anchors," Proc 28th Int Conf Ocean Offshore Arctic Eng, Honolulu, USA, OMAE80238.

9.
O'Loughlin, CD, Richardson, MD, Randolph, MF, Gaudin, C (2013). "Penetration of dynamically installed anchors in clay," Geotechnique 63 (11), 909-19. crossref(new window)

10.
Richardson, MD, O'Loughlin, CD, Randolph, MF, Gaudin, C (2009). "Setup following installation of dynamic anchors in normally consolidated clay," J Geotech Geoenviron Eng, ASCE 135 (4), 487-96. crossref(new window)

11.
True, DG (1974). "Rapid penetration into seafloor soils," Proc Offshore Technology Conf, Houston, OTC2095.

12.
Young, CW (1997), Penetration Equations, Sandia National Laboratories, 5-12

13.
Zhu, X (2006), Application of the CIP Method to Strongly Nonlinear Wave-Body Interaction Problems, Doctoral Thesis, Dept Marine Tech, NTNU, 73-90.