Advanced SearchSearch Tips
The Impact of Moving Pharmaceutical Products from Prescription Only to Over-the-Counter Status on Consumer Exposure to Advertising
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
 Title & Authors
The Impact of Moving Pharmaceutical Products from Prescription Only to Over-the-Counter Status on Consumer Exposure to Advertising
Yang, Hae-Kyung;
  PDF(new window)
Many pharmaceutical products are available through prescription (Rx) only status. As a result, access to physicians and insurance coverage play a key role in the use of these products, and therefore may affect the population to whom advertising is targeted at. The movement of pharmaceutical products from prescription (Rx) to Over-the-Counter (OTC), or Rx-to-OTC switch changes the cost of acquiring the drug and therefore may change the incentives manufacturers have at targeting particular population segments. This study examines whether Rx-to-OTC switch changes the frequency and the distribution of who is exposed to pharmaceutical advertising. Using an archive of pharmaceutical advertisements and National Consumer Survey, this study examines how individuals with particular demographic characteristics are exposed to pharmaceutical advertisements before and after drugs are moved from Rx to OTC. The results provide evidence that individual's advertising exposure increases after Rx-to-OTC switch. Moreover, the increase in advertising exposure is greater for the low socioeconomic status (SES) consumers which implies they may get more information about the disease, treatment and product after the Rx-to-OTC switch through advertising. If low SES consumers have more exposure to the advertising after products switched to OTC, then FDA policies regulating this switch should recognize the potential role of advertising providing access to health-related information.
Rx-to-OTC switch;direct-to-consumer advertising;advertising exposure;socioeconomic status;
 Cited by
전문의약품 소비자광고가 생활습관 변화에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구,양혜경;

대한가정학회지, 2012. vol.50. 4, pp.103-113 crossref(new window)
eWOM, revisit intention, destination trust and gender, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2017, 31, 220  crossref(new windwow)
Cross-border mobility and social networks: Laotians seeking medical treatment along the Thai border, Social Science & Medicine, 2015, 124, 364  crossref(new windwow)
Understanding medical tourists: Word-of-mouth and viral marketing as potent marketing tools, Tourism Management, 2013, 34, 196  crossref(new windwow)
Impact of online WOM on destination trust and intention to travel: A medical tourism perspective, Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2016, 5, 3, 192  crossref(new windwow)
Avery, R., Kenkel, D., Lillard, D., & Alan M. (2007a). Regulating advertisements: The case of smoking cessation products. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 31(2), 185-208. crossref(new window)

Avery, R., Kenkel, D., Lillard, D., & Alan M. (2007b). Private profits and public health: Does advertising smoking cessation products encourage smokers to quit? Journal of Political Economy, 115(3), 447-481. crossref(new window)

Calfee, J. E. (2002). Public policy issues in direct-toconsumer advertising of prescription drugs. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 21(Fall), 174-193. crossref(new window)

Creyer, E. H., Hrsistodoulakis, I., & Cole, C. A. (2001). Changing a drug from Rx to OTC status: the consumer behavior and public policy implications of switch drugs. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 10(1), 52-64. crossref(new window)

Donohue, J. (2006). Direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription drugs: Does it add to the overuse and inappropriate use of prescription drugs or alleviate under-use? International Journal of Pharmaceutical Medicine, 20(1), 17-24. crossref(new window)

Hoek, J., Gendall, P., Rapson, L., & Louviere, J. (2011). Information accessibility and consumers' knowledge of prescription drug benefits and risks. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 45(2), 248-274. crossref(new window)

Food and Drug Administration. (2002). Claritin approval marks significant shift in Rx-to-OTC switches. The Food & Drug Letter, Issue No. 666.

Frosch, D. L, Grande, D., Tam, D. M., & Kravitz, R. L. (2010). A decade of controversy: Balancing policy with evidence in the regulation of prescription drug advertising. American Journal of Public Health, 100(1), 24-32. crossref(new window)

Kaphingst, K. A., & DeJong, W. (2004). The educational potential of direct-to-consumer prescription drug advertising. Health Affairs, 23(4), 143-150. crossref(new window)

Kelly, P. (2004). Perspective: DTC advertising's benefits far outweigh its imperfections. Health Affairs, w4, 246-248.

Korea Food and Drug Administration (2011). Press release: KFDA's perspective on Rx-to-OTC switch, from

Lexchin, J. (1999). Direct-to-consumer advertising: Impact on patient expectations regarding disease management. Disease Management and Health Outcomes, 5(May), 273-283. crossref(new window)

Ling, D., Berndt, E., & Kyle, M. (2002). Deregulating direct to consumer marketing of drugs: Effects on prescription and over-the-counter product sales. The Journal of Law and Economics, 45(2), 691-723. crossref(new window)

Meek, C. (2001). Direct-to-Consumer Advertising of Prescription Medicines: A Review of International Policy and Evidence. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain.

Morris, L., Ruffner, M., & Klimberg, R. (1985). Warning disclosures for prescription drugs, Journal of Advertising Research, 25(October-December), 25-32.

Morris, L., Brinberg, D., Klimberge, R., Rivera, C., & Millstein, L. (1986). The attitudes of consumers toward direct advertising of prescription drugs. Public Health Report, 101(1), 82-89.

Myers, S. D., Royne, M. B., & Deitz, G. D. (2011). Direct-to-consumer advertising: exposure, behavior, and policy implications. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 110-118. crossref(new window)

Toop, L., Richards, D., Dowell, T., Tilyard, M., Fraser, T., & Arroll, B. (2003). DTCA in New Zealand - Report to Minister of Health Supporting the Ban on DTCA.