JOURNAL BROWSE
Search
Advanced SearchSearch Tips
Pretreatment in Reverse Osmosis Seawater Desalination: A Short Review
facebook(new window)  Pirnt(new window) E-mail(new window) Excel Download
  • Journal title : Environmental Engineering Research
  • Volume 16, Issue 4,  2011, pp.205-212
  • Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
  • DOI : 10.4491/eer.2011.16.4.205
 Title & Authors
Pretreatment in Reverse Osmosis Seawater Desalination: A Short Review
Valavala, Ramesh; Sohn, Jin-Sik; Han, Ji-Hee; Her, Nam-Guk; Yoon, Yeo-Min;
  PDF(new window)
 Abstract
Reverse osmosis (RO) technology has developed over the past 40 years to control a 44% market share in the world desalting production capacity and an 80% share in the total number of desalination plants installed worldwide. The application of conventional and low-pressure membrane pretreatment processes to seawater RO (SWRO) desalination has undergone accelerated development over the past decade. Reliable pretreatment techniques are required for the successful operation of SWRO processes, since a major issue is membrane fouling associated with particulate matter/colloids, organic/inorganic compounds, and biological growth. While conventional pretreatment processes such as coagulation and granular media filtration have been widely used for SWRO, there has been an increased tendency toward the use of ultrafiltration/microfiltration (UF/MF) instead of conventional treatment techniques. The literature shows that both the conventional and the UF/MF membrane pretreatment processes have different advantages and disadvantages. This review suggests that, depending on the feed water quality conditions, the suitable integration of multiple pretreatment processes may be considered valid since this would utilize the benefits of each separate pretreatment.
 Keywords
Coagulation;Desalination;Low-pressure membrane;Pretreatment;Reverse osmosis;
 Language
English
 Cited by
1.
Scaling predictions in seawater reverse osmosis desalination,;;;;

Membrane Water Treatment, 2014. vol.5. 3, pp.221-233 crossref(new window)
1.
Influence of microbubble in physical cleaning of MF membrane process for wastewater reuse, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2015, 22, 11, 8451  crossref(new windwow)
2.
Seawater ultrafiltration: role of particles on organic rejections and permeate fluxes, Environmental Technology, 2013, 34, 17, 2553  crossref(new windwow)
3.
A review on the applicability of integrated/hybrid membrane processes in water treatment and desalination plants, Desalination, 2015, 363, 2  crossref(new windwow)
4.
Biological support media influence the bacterial biofouling community in reverse osmosis water reclamation demonstration plants, Biofouling, 2015, 31, 2, 173  crossref(new windwow)
5.
Removal of fluoride and total dissolved solids from coalbed methane produced water with a movable ultra-low pressure reverse osmosis system, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2013, 51, 22-24, 4359  crossref(new windwow)
6.
Can desalinated seawater contribute to iodine-deficiency disorders? An observation and hypothesis, Public Health Nutrition, 2016, 19, 15, 2808  crossref(new windwow)
7.
Long-term effect on membrane fouling in a new membrane bioreactor as a pretreatment to seawater desalination, Bioresource Technology, 2014, 165, 60  crossref(new windwow)
8.
Electrokinetic pretreatment of seawater to decrease the Ca2+, Mg2+, SO42− and bacteria contents in membrane desalination applications, Desalination, 2016  crossref(new windwow)
9.
Precipitation softening: a pretreatment process for seawater desalination, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21, 4, 2876  crossref(new windwow)
10.
Costs for water supply, treatment, end-use and reclamation, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2013, 51, 1-3, 200  crossref(new windwow)
11.
Comparison between oily and coal seam gas produced water with respect to quantity, characteristics and treatment technologies: a review, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2015, 54, 7, 1793  crossref(new windwow)
12.
Kinetic Study of Seawater Reverse Osmosis Membrane Fouling, Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47, 19, 10884  crossref(new windwow)
13.
Enhancing organic matter removal in desalination pretreatment systems by application of dissolved air flotation, Desalination, 2016, 383, 12  crossref(new windwow)
14.
Electrodialysis for desalination of brackish groundwater in coastal areas of Korea, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2013, 51, 31-33, 6230  crossref(new windwow)
15.
Enhanced boron removal using polyol compounds in seawater reverse osmosis processes, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016, 57, 17, 7910  crossref(new windwow)
16.
Scaling predictions in seawater reverse osmosis desalination, Membrane Water Treatment, 2014, 5, 3, 221  crossref(new windwow)
17.
Aquifer Treatment of Sea Water to Remove Natural Organic Matter Before Desalination, Groundwater, 2016  crossref(new windwow)
18.
An optimal design approach of gas hydrate and reverse osmosis hybrid system for seawater desalination, Desalination and Water Treatment, 2016, 57, 19, 9009  crossref(new windwow)
 References
1.
Service RF. Desalination freshens up. Science 2006;313:1088-1090. crossref(new window)

2.
Sanza MA, Bonnelyea V, Cremerb G. Fujairah reverse osmosis plant: 2 years of operation. Desalination 2007;203:91-99. crossref(new window)

3.
Sauvet-Goichon B. Ashkelon desalination plant - a successful challenge. Desalination 2007;203:75-81. crossref(new window)

4.
Prihasto N, Liu QF, Kim SH. Pre-treatment strategies for seawater desalination by reverse osmosis system. Desalination 2009;249:308-316. crossref(new window)

5.
Gleick PH. The world's water, 2006-2007: the biennial report on freshwater resources. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2006.

6.
Fritzmann C, Lowenberg J, Wintgens T, Melin T. State-of-the-art of reverse osmosis desalination. Desalination 2007;216:1-76. crossref(new window)

7.
Greenlee LF, Lawler DF, Freeman BD, Marrot B, Moulin P. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges. Water Res. 2009;43:2317-2348. crossref(new window)

8.
Brehant A, Bonnelye V, Perez M. Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination. Desalination 2002;144:353-360. crossref(new window)

9.
Reverter JA, Talo S, Alday J. Las Palmas III - the success story of brine staging. Desalination 2001;138:207-217. crossref(new window)

10.
Reverberi F, Gorenflo A. Three year operational experience of a spiral-wound SWRO system with a high fouling potential feed water. Desalination 2007;203:100-106. crossref(new window)

11.
Tran T, Bolto B, Gray S, Hoang M, Ostarcevic E. An autopsy study of a fouled reverse osmosis membrane element used in a brackish water treatment plant. Water Res. 2007;41:3915-3923. crossref(new window)

12.
Magara Y, Kawasaki M, Sekino M, Yamamura H. Development of reverse osmosis membrane seawater desalination in Japan. Water Sci. Technol. 2000;41:1-8.

13.
Her N, Amy G, Chung J, Yoon J, Yoon Y. Characterizing dissolved organic matter and evaluating associated nanofiltration membrane fouling. Chemosphere 2008;70:495-502. crossref(new window)

14.
Her N, Amy G, Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variations of nano-filtration (NF) foulants: identification and control. Desalination 2000;132:143-160. crossref(new window)

15.
Yoon J, Yoon Y, Amy G, Her N. Determination of perchlorate rejection and associated inorganic fouling (scaling) for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes under various operating conditions. J. Environ. Eng. 2005;131:726-733. crossref(new window)

16.
Lee H, Amy G, Cho J, Yoon Y, Moon SH, Kim IS. Cleaning strategies for flux recovery of an ultrafiltration membrane fouled by natural organic matter. Water Res. 2001;35:3301-3308. crossref(new window)

17.
Abdessemed D, Nezzal G. Coupling softening - ultrafiltration like pretreatment of sea water case study of the Corso plant desalination (Algiers). Desalination 2008;221:107-113. crossref(new window)

18.
Bonnelye V, Sanz MA, Durand JP, Plasse L, Gueguen F, Mazounie P. Reverse osmosis on open intake seawater: pretreatment strategy. Desalination 2004;167:191-200. crossref(new window)

19.
Burashid K, Hussain AR. Seawater RO plant operation and maintenance experience: Addur desalination plant operation assessment. Desalination 2004;165:11-22.

20.
Chua KT, Hawlader MN, Malek A. Pretreatment of seawater: results of pilot trials in Singapore. Desalination 2003;159:225-243. crossref(new window)

21.
Ebrahim S, Abdel-Jawad M, Bou-Hamad S, Safar M. Fifteen years of R&D program in seawater desalination at KISR Part I. Pretreatment technologies for RO systems. Desalination 2001;135:141-153. crossref(new window)

22.
Glueckstern P, Priel M, Wilf M. Field evaluation of capillary UF technology as a pretreatment for large seawater RO systems. Desalination 2002;147:55-62. crossref(new window)

23.
Pervov AG, Andrianov AP, Efremov RV, Desyatov AV, Baranov AE. A new solution for the Caspian Sea desalination: lowpressure membranes. Desalination 2003;157:377-384. crossref(new window)

24.
Van Hoof SC, Hashim A, Kordes AJ. The effect of ultrafiltration as pretreatment to reverse osmosis in wastewater reuse and seawater desalination applications. Desalination 1999;124:231-242. crossref(new window)

25.
Xu J, Ruan G, Chu X, Yao Y, Su B, Gao C. A pilot study of UF pretreatment without any chemicals for SWRO desalination in China. Desalination 2007;207:216-226. crossref(new window)

26.
Sinha S, Yoon Y, Amy G, Yoon J. Determining the effectiveness of conventional and alternative coagulants through effective characterization schemes. Chemosphere 2004;57:1115-1122. crossref(new window)

27.
Khawaji AD, Kutubkhanah IK, Wie JM. A 13.3 MGD seawater RO desalination plant for Yanbu Industrial City. Desalination 2007;203:176-188. crossref(new window)

28.
Bache DH, Gregory R. Flocs and separation processes in drinking water treatment: a review. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 2010;59:16-30. crossref(new window)

29.
Wilf M, Bartels C. Integrated membrane desalination systems--current status and projected development [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.membranes.com/docs/papers/New%20Folder/Abstract%20for%20Tianjin%20-%20Hydranautics.pdf.

30.
Choi KY, Dempsey BA. In-line coagulation with low-pressure membrane filtration. Water Res. 2004;38:4271-4281. crossref(new window)

31.
Gabelich CJ, Yun TI, Coffey BM, Suffet IH. Effects of aluminum sulfate and ferric chloride coagulant residuals on polyamide membrane performance. Desalination 2002;150:15-30. crossref(new window)

32.
Gabelich CJ, Williams MD, Rahardianto A, Franklin JC, Cohen Y. High-recovery reverse osmosis desalination using intermediate chemical demineralization. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;301:131-141. crossref(new window)

33.
Rahardianto A, Gao J, Gabelich CJ, Williams MD, Cohen Y. High recovery membrane desalting of low-salinity brackish water: Integration of accelerated precipitation softening with membrane RO. J. Membr. Sci. 2007;289:123-137. crossref(new window)

34.
Nadav N, Priel M, Glueckstern P. Boron removal from the permeate of a large SWRO plant in Eilat. Desalination 2005;185:121-129. crossref(new window)

35.
Gaid K, Treal Y. Le dessalement des eaux par osmose inverse: l'experience de Veolia Water. Desalination 2007;203:1-14. crossref(new window)

36.
Glueckstern P, Priel M. Optimization of boron removal in old and new SWRO systems. Desalination 2003;156:219-228. crossref(new window)

37.
Koseoglu H, Kabay N, Yuksel M, Sarp S, Arar O, Kitis M. Boron removal from seawater using high rejection SWRO membranes - impact of pH, feed concentration, pressure, and cross-flow velocity. Desalination 2008;227:253-263. crossref(new window)

38.
Mane PP, Park PK, Hyung H, Brown JC, Kim JH. Modeling boron rejection in pilot- and full-scale reverse osmosis desalination processes. J. Membr. Sci. 2009;338:119-127. crossref(new window)

39.
Taniguchi M, Fusaoka Y, Nishikawa T, Kurihara M. Boron removal in RO seawater desalination. Desalination 2004;167:419-426. crossref(new window)

40.
Huang H, Schwab K, Jacangelo JG. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009;43:3011-3019. crossref(new window)

41.
Munoz Elguera A, Perez Baez SO. Development of the most adequate pre-treatment for high capacity seawater desalination plants with open intake. Desalination 2005;184:173-183. crossref(new window)

42.
O'Melia CR. Aquasols: the behavior of small particles in aquatic systems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1980;14:1052-1060. crossref(new window)

43.
Water desalination. Technical manual TM 5-813-8. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Army; 1986.

44.
Peleka EN, Matis KA. Application of flotation as a pretreatment process during desalination. Desalination 2008;222:1-8. crossref(new window)

45.
Rubio J, Souza ML, Smith RW. Overview of flotation as a wastewater treatment technique. Miner. Eng. 2002;15:139-155. crossref(new window)

46.
Vedavyasan CV. Pretreatment trends - an overview. Desalination 2007;203:296-299. crossref(new window)

47.
Pearce GK. The case for UF/MF pretreatment to RO in seawater applications. Desalination 2007;203:286-295. crossref(new window)

48.
Choi YH, Kweon JH, Kim DI, Lee S. Evaluation of various pretreatment for particle and inorganic fouling control on performance of SWRO. Desalination 2009;247:137-147. crossref(new window)

49.
Hamed OA. Overview of hybrid desalination systems - current status and future prospects. Desalination 2005;186:207-214. crossref(new window)

50.
Van der Bruggen B, Vandecasteele C. Distillation vs. membrane filtration: overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination. Desalination 2002;143:207-218. crossref(new window)

51.
Kamp PC, Kruithof JC, Folmer HC. UF/RO treatment plant Heemskerk: from challenge to full scale application. Desalination 2000;131:27-35. crossref(new window)

52.
Pearce GK. UF/MF pre-treatment to RO in seawater and wastewater reuse applications: a comparison of energy costs. Desalination 2008;222:66-73. crossref(new window)

53.
Teuler A, Glucina K, Laine JM. Assessment of UF pretreatment prior RO membranes for seawater desalination. Desalination 1999;125:89-96. crossref(new window)

54.
Kimura K, Maeda T, Yamamura H, Watanabe Y. Irreversible membrane fouling in microfiltration membranes filtering coagulated surface water. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;320:356-362. crossref(new window)

55.
Tran T, Gray S, Naughton R, Bolto B. Polysilicato-iron for improved NOM removal and membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006;280:560-571. crossref(new window)

56.
Wang J, Guan J, Santiwong SR, Waite TD. Characterization of floc size and structure under different monomer and polymer coagulants on microfiltration membrane fouling. J. Membr. Sci. 2008;321:132-138. crossref(new window)

57.
Howe KJ, Marwah A, Chiu KP, Adham SS. Effect of coagulation on the size of MF and UF membrane foulants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:7908-7913. crossref(new window)

58.
Schafer AI, Fane AG, Waite TD. Cost factors and chemical pretreatment effects in the membrane filtration of waters containing natural organic matter. Water Res. 2001;35:1509-1517. crossref(new window)

59.
Lee J, Walker HW. Effect of process variables and natural organic matter on removal of microcystin-LR by PAC - UF. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006;40:7336-7342. crossref(new window)

60.
Yoon Y, Westerhoff P, Snyder SA, Esparza M. HPLC-fluorescence detection and adsorption of bisphenol A, $17\beta$-estradiol, and $17\alpha$-ethynyl estradiol on powdered activated carbon. Water Res. 2003;37:3530-3537. crossref(new window)

61.
Najm IN, Snoeyink VL, Lykins BW, Adams JQ. Using powdered activated carbon - a critical review. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1991;83:65-76.

62.
Westerhoff P, Yoon Y, Snyder S, Wert E. Fate of endocrine-disruptor, pharmaceutical, and personal care product chemicals during simulated drinking water treatment processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005;39:6649-6663. crossref(new window)

63.
Yoon Y, Westerhoff P, Snyder SA. Adsorption of 3H-labeled $17-\beta$ estradiol on powdered activated carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2005;166:343-351. crossref(new window)

64.
Tien VN, Chaudhary DS, Ngo HH, Vigneswaran S. Arsenic in water: concerns and treatment technologies. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2004;10:337-348.

65.
Tsujimoto W, Kimura H, Izu T, Irie T. Membrane filtration and pre-treatment by GAC. Desalination 1998;119:323-326. crossref(new window)

66.
Yuasa A. Drinking water production by coagulation-microfiltration and adsorption-ultrafiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 1998;37:135-146.

67.
Mauter MS, Elimelech M. Environmental applications of carbon-based nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:5843-5859. crossref(new window)

68.
Pan B, Xing B. Adsorption mechanisms of organic chemicals on carbon nanotubes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:9005-9013. crossref(new window)

69.
Upadhyayula VK, Deng S, Mitchell MC, Smith GB. Application of carbon nanotube technology for removal of contaminants in drinking water: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 2009;408:1-13. crossref(new window)

70.
Crittenden J, Montgomery Watson Harza. Water treatment principles and design. 2nd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley; 2005. p. 75-90.

71.
Vos G, Brekvoort Y, Oosterom HA, Nederlof MM. Treatment of canal water with ultrafiltration to produce industrial and household water. Desalination 1998;118:297-303. crossref(new window)

72.
Plummer JD, Edzwald JK. Effects of chlorine and ozone on algal cell properties and removal of algae by coagulation. J. Water Supply Res. Technol. AQUA 2002;51:307-318.

73.
Wilczak A, Howe EW, Aieta EM, Lee RG. How preoxidation affects particle removal during clarification and filtration. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 1992;84:85-94.

74.
Hasan Al-Sheikh AH. Seawater reverse osmosis pretreatment with an emphasis on the Jeddah Plant operation experience. Desalination 1997;110:183-192. crossref(new window)

75.
Lorain O, Hersant B, Persin F, Grasmick A, Brunard N, Espenan JM. Ultrafiltration membrane pre-treatment benefits for reverse osmosis process in seawater desalting. Quantification in terms of capital investment cost and operating cost reduction. Desalination 2007;203:277-285. crossref(new window)