Publisher : Korean Society of Environmental Engineering
DOI : 10.4491/eer.2011.16.4.213
Title & Authors
Nutrient Removal Using Fermented Organic Acids Derived from the Primary Sludge in the Intermittent Aeration Activated Sludge Process Weon, Seung-Yeon; Lee, Sang-Il; Lee, Chan-Won;
The two-stage intermittent aeration activated sludge process (IAP) and dynamic-flow intermittent aeration activated sludge process (DFP) were investigated for the nutrient removal of domestic wastewater. Three sets of IAP and one set of DFP were operated. The fermented settled sludge taken from the primary settling tank was added to two IAP and one DFP as an external electron donor, with one IAP, in which an external carbon source was not added, as a control. All the systems were operated at a sludge retention time of 20 days and a hydraulic retention time of 12 hr. A Higher denitrification rate was observed with the fermented settled sludge for the denitrification compared to the process without the addition of the organic source. The result indicates that the fermented acid from the primary domestic sludge has been proved to be an excellent electron donor for denitrification and biological phosphorus removal with IAP and DFP in treating relatively low C/N ratio(Carbon / Nitrogen ratio) wastewater. Phosphate accumulating organisms have a capability of competing with denitrifiers in the presence of volatile organic acids under anoxic conditions.
Henze M. Capabilities of biological nitrogen removal processes from wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1991;23:669-679.
Zhao H, Isaacs SH, Soeberg H, Kummel M. A novel control strategy for improved nitrogen removal in an alternating activated sludge process - Part II. Control development. Water Res. 1994;28:535-542.
Osada T, Haga K, Harada Y. Removal of nitrogen and phosphorus from swine wastewater by the activated sludge units with the intermittent aeration process. Water Res. 1991;25:1377-1388.
Sasaki K, Yamamoto Y, Tsumura K, Ouchit S, Mori Y. Development of 2-reactor intermittent-aeration activated sludge process for simultaneous removal of nitrogen and phosphorus. Water Sci. Technol. 1996;34:111-118.
Isaacs SH, Henze M, Soeberg H, Kummel M. External carbon source addition as a means to control an activated sludge nutrient removal process. Water Res. 1994;28:511-520.
Hammer MJ. Water and wastewater technology. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall; 2001. p. 495.
Van Munch E, Greenfield PF. Estimating VFA concentrations in prefermenters by measuring pH. Water Research. 1988;32:2431-2441
Lee SI, Koopman B, Park SK, Cadee K. Effect of fermented wastes on denitrification in activated sludge. Water Environ. Res. 1995;67:1119-1122.
Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, et al. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1995.
Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Metcalf & Eddy. Wastewater engineering: treatment, disposal, and reuse. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1991.
Hatziconstantinou GJ, Yannakopoulos P, Andreadakis A. Primary sludge hydrolysis for biological nutrient removal. Water Sci. Technol. 1996;34:417-423.
Jung SJ, Miyanaga K, Tanji Y, Unno H. Effect of intermittent aeration on the decrease of biological sludge amount. Biochem. Eng. J. 2006;27:246-251.
Iwema A, Meunier A. Influence of nitrate on acetic acid induced biological phosphate removal. Water Sci. Technol. 1985;17:289-294.
Mino T, Van Loosdrecht MC, Heijnen JJ. Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water Res. 1998;32:3193-3207.
Comeau Y. The role of carbon strage in biological phosphate removal from wastewater [dissertation]. Vancouver: University of British Columbia; 1989.
Wentzel MC, Lotter LH, Loewenthal RE, Marais Gv R. Metabolic behaviour of Acinetobacter spp. in enhanced biological phosphorus removal - a biochemical model. Water SA 1986;12:209-224.